Potential emissions reductions from grandfathered coal power plants in the United States

被引:12
|
作者
Cohan, Daniel S. [1 ]
Douglass, Catherine [1 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Houston, TX 77005 USA
关键词
Coal-fired power plants; Air pollutant emissions; Retrofit control technologies; BAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.039
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A two-tiered approach to environmental regulation in the United States has long allowed existing coal-fired power plants to emit air pollutants at far higher rates than new facilities. The potential for reducing the emissions of existing coal-fired facilities is quantified via two hypothetical scenarios: the installation of available retrofit control technologies, or the imposition of New Source Performance Standards (NSPS). Available control technologies could have reduced year 2005 emissions by 56% for NOx and 72% for SO2 for a cost of $11.3 billion/year (2004$), likely yielding far larger benefits to human health. Slightly more emission reductions would be achieved by upgrading or replacing existing facilities to achieve the NSPS emissions limits required of all new facilities. Potential CO2 reductions are more speculative due to the emerging nature of carbon capture and efficiency retrofit technologies. Recent policies such as the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule would likely achieve most of the NOx and SO2 reduction potential identified by the scenario analyses for grandfathered facilities. However, escalating obstacles to new generation capacity may perpetuate the reliance on an aging fleet of power plants, resulting in higher rates of coal consumption and CO2 emissions than could be achieved by new or retrofit units. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4816 / 4822
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] TRACE-ELEMENT EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIRED POWER-PLANTS
    MESEROLE, FB
    SCHWITZGEBEL, K
    MAGEE, RA
    MANN, RM
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1979, 101 (06) : 97 - 98
  • [43] Estimation of heavy metal emissions from coal-fired power plants in Russia
    Gromov, S
    Ginzburg, V
    AIR POLLUTION VI, 1998, 6 : 597 - 606
  • [44] Novel sorbents for mercury emissions control from coal-fired power plants
    Lee, Sang-Sup
    Lee, Joo-Youp
    Keener, Tim C.
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2008, 39 (02): : 137 - 142
  • [45] Prediction of mercury air emissions from coal-fired power plants.
    Senior, CL
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 220 : U386 - U386
  • [46] RISK ASSESSMENT - AIR EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIRED POWER-PLANTS
    RICCI, PF
    EPRI JOURNAL, 1985, 10 (05): : 53 - 55
  • [47] TRACE-ELEMENT EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIRED POWER-PLANTS
    MESEROLE, FB
    SCHWITZGEBEL, K
    MAGEE, RA
    MANN, RM
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1979, 101 (04): : 620 - 624
  • [48] Emissions from waste-to-energy: A comparison with coal-fired power plants
    Albina, DO
    Themelis, NJ
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND RESOURCES - 2003, 2003, : 169 - 184
  • [49] ATMOSPHERIC MERCURY EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS IN NORTHERN CHINA
    Wang, Jian
    Ouyang, Xiaoguang
    Wu, Lei
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2014, 23 (3A): : 875 - 886
  • [50] Carbon dioxide emissions from global overseas coal-fired power plants
    Guo, Peng
    Shen, Huizhong
    Chen, Yilin
    Dai, Hancheng
    Mai, Zelin
    Xu, Ruibin
    Zhang, Ruixin
    Wang, Zhanxiang
    He, Jinling
    Zheng, Lianming
    Sun, Haitong Zhe
    Ke, Kainan
    Meng, Jing
    Liu, Maodian
    Li, Jin
    Adalibieke, Wulahati
    Wang, Chen
    Ye, Jianhuai
    Zhu, Lei
    Shen, Guofeng
    Fu, Tzung-May
    Tsang, Albert
    Yang, Xin
    Russell, Armistead G.
    Driscoll, Charles T.
    Tao, Shu
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2024, : 1151 - 1157