Potential emissions reductions from grandfathered coal power plants in the United States

被引:12
|
作者
Cohan, Daniel S. [1 ]
Douglass, Catherine [1 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Houston, TX 77005 USA
关键词
Coal-fired power plants; Air pollutant emissions; Retrofit control technologies; BAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.039
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A two-tiered approach to environmental regulation in the United States has long allowed existing coal-fired power plants to emit air pollutants at far higher rates than new facilities. The potential for reducing the emissions of existing coal-fired facilities is quantified via two hypothetical scenarios: the installation of available retrofit control technologies, or the imposition of New Source Performance Standards (NSPS). Available control technologies could have reduced year 2005 emissions by 56% for NOx and 72% for SO2 for a cost of $11.3 billion/year (2004$), likely yielding far larger benefits to human health. Slightly more emission reductions would be achieved by upgrading or replacing existing facilities to achieve the NSPS emissions limits required of all new facilities. Potential CO2 reductions are more speculative due to the emerging nature of carbon capture and efficiency retrofit technologies. Recent policies such as the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule would likely achieve most of the NOx and SO2 reduction potential identified by the scenario analyses for grandfathered facilities. However, escalating obstacles to new generation capacity may perpetuate the reliance on an aging fleet of power plants, resulting in higher rates of coal consumption and CO2 emissions than could be achieved by new or retrofit units. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4816 / 4822
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nuclear power plants in the United States
    不详
    POWER, 2007, 151 (11) : 52 - 53
  • [22] Uncertainty and Variability in Health-Related Damages from Coal-Fired Power Plants in the United States
    Levy, Jonathan I.
    Baxter, Lisa K.
    Schwartz, Joel
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2009, 29 (07) : 1000 - 1014
  • [23] ANALYZING RADIONUCLIDE EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIRED POWER-PLANTS
    KEENEY, RL
    SICHERMAN, A
    SMITH, GR
    INTERFACES, 1985, 15 (05) : 12 - 24
  • [24] ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIRED THERMAL POWER-PLANTS
    COLLEY, DG
    CIM BULLETIN, 1988, 81 (915): : 49 - 49
  • [25] THE ACCUMULATION BY PLANTS OF EMISSIONS FROM A COAL-FIRED POWER-PLANT
    MURRAY, F
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1984, 18 (08) : 1705 - 1709
  • [26] Mercury emissions from six coal-fired power plants in China
    Zhang, Liang
    Zhuo, Yuqun
    Chen, Lei
    Xu, Xuchang
    Chen, Changhe
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 89 (11) : 1033 - 1040
  • [27] Mercury emissions and partitioning from Indian coal-fired power plants
    Hridesh Agarwalla
    Rabi Narayan Senapati
    Tarit Baran Das
    Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2021, 100 (02) : 28 - 33
  • [28] Urban impacts of mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants
    Sullivan, Terry M.
    Adams, Jay
    Blake, Reginald
    JOURNAL OF URBAN TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 13 (02) : 53 - 70
  • [29] Mercury emissions and partitioning from Indian coal-fired power plants
    Agarwalla, Hridesh
    Senapati, Rabi Narayan
    Das, Tarit Baran
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2021, 100 : 28 - 33
  • [30] MODEL-MODERATED COST COVERAGE OF REDUCTIONS IN POLLUTANTS FROM EMISSIONS OF POWER-PLANTS
    HANSEN, U
    MUSSENBROCK, K
    SCHON, R
    BRENNSTOFF-WARME-KRAFT, 1985, 37 (09): : S71 - S76