EAO Position Paper: Material Selection for Implant-Supported Restorations

被引:12
|
作者
Pjetursson, Bjarni Elvar [1 ,2 ]
Fehmer, Vincent [2 ]
Sailer, Irena [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iceland, Fac Odontol, Dept Reconstruct Dent, Vatnsmyrarvegi 16, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland
[2] Univ Geneva, Univ Clin Dent Med, Div Fixed Prosthodont & Biomat, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
COMPLETE DIGITAL WORKFLOW; FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES; COMPLICATION RATES; ZIRCONIA ABUTMENTS; VENEERED ZIRCONIA; SURVIVAL; FRACTURE; STRENGTH; CROWNS; RECONSTRUCTIONS;
D O I
10.11607/ijp.8013
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
In recent years, numerous new dental materials have been introduced as alternatives to metal-ceramics for restorations on teeth and implants. This position paper presents the current evidence and respective clinical recommendations of the European Association for Osseointegration (EAO), one of the scientific partners of the International Journal of Prosthodontics, on material selection for single crowns (SCs) and multiple-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Metal-ceramic restorations can be utilized in most clinical indications and are preferred to ceramic restorations in incidences such as long clinical implant crowns; cantilever implant restorations where one implant is supporting two crowns; implant-supported FDPs with extension units extending more than 7 to 8 mm (premolar size); implant-supported FDPs with more than two pontics; and implant-supported FDPs with small connector diameters due to limited intraocclusal space. Veneered or monolithic zirconia-ceramic and veneered or monolithic reinforced glass-ceramic implant-supported SCs are indicated for most SC cases in both the anterior and posterior areas. Today, implant-supported zirconia-ceramic FDPs that are conventionally veneered cannot be considered the material of first priority due to the pronounced risk for fracture of the framework and catastrophic fracture of the veneering material. Monolithic zirconia FDPs are a promising alternative to veneered implant-supported zirconia-ceramic FDPs. The mechanical stability of the translucent and shaded zirconia differs significantly between the grades of translucency. This must always be considered when clinical indications are recommended. As this specific area of prosthodontics is evolving fast, numerous studies evaluating different material options in implant prosthodontics are currently performed worldwide, and future consensus meetings will refine the present recommendations. The EAO will therefore regularly publish updated position papers on relevant topics. Int J Prosthodont 2022,35::7--16. doi: 10.11607/ijp.8013 /
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 16
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] In vivo fracture resistance of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations
    Yildirim, M
    Fischer, H
    Marx, R
    Edelhoff, D
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 90 (04): : 325 - 331
  • [42] Effect of abutment types and resin cements on the esthetics of implant-supported restorations
    Ceken, Asena
    Kilinc, Hamiyet
    Turgut, Sedanur
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2023, 15 (03): : 114 - 125
  • [43] CAD/CAM-fabricated implant-supported restorations: a systematic review
    Patzelt, Sebastian Berthold Maximilian
    Spies, Benedikt C.
    Kohal, Ralf J.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 : 77 - 85
  • [44] Patient Satisfaction with Implant-Supported Monolithic and Partially Veneered Zirconia Restorations
    De Angelis, Paolo
    Gasparini, Giulio
    Rella, Edoardo
    De Angelis, Silvio
    Grippaudo, Cristina
    D'Addona, Antonio
    Manicone, Paolo Francesco
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021
  • [45] Digital image correlation analysis of the load transfer by implant-supported restorations
    Tiossi, Rodrigo
    Lin, Lianshan
    Rodrigues, Renata C. S.
    Heo, Young C.
    Conrad, Heather J.
    de Mattos, Maria da Gloria C.
    Ribeiro, Ricardo F.
    Fok, Alex S. L.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2011, 44 (06) : 1008 - 1013
  • [46] Metal-free implant-supported single-tooth restorations
    Edelhoff, Daniel
    Schweiger, Josef
    Prandtner, Otto
    Stimmelmayr, Michael
    Gueth, Jan-Frederik
    IMPLANTOLOGIE, 2018, 26 (04): : 353 - 370
  • [47] PROXIMAL CONTACT LOSS MAY BE A FREQUENT COMPLICATION IN IMPLANT-SUPPORTED RESTORATIONS
    Cheng, Linda L.
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [48] COMPLICATIONS OF THE IMPLANT-SUPPORTED POSTERIOR MANDIBULAR SINGLE RESTORATIONS WITH MESIAL CANTILEVER
    Shin, He Sung
    Kim, Myung-Rae
    Kim, Sun-Jong
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2009, 35 (04) : 248 - 252
  • [49] Clinical Factors Influencing Removal of the Cement Excess in Implant-Supported Restorations
    Vindasiute, Egle
    Puisys, Algirdas
    Maslova, Natalja
    Linkeviciene, Laura
    Peciuliene, Vytaute
    Linkevicius, Tomas
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (04) : 771 - 778
  • [50] The Abutment Duplication Technique: A Novel Protocol for Cementable Implant-Supported Restorations
    Cocchetto, Roberto
    Resch, Ingrid
    Castagna, Marco
    Vincenzi, Giampaolo
    Celletti, Renato
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2010, 30 (04) : 415 - 424