EAO Position Paper: Material Selection for Implant-Supported Restorations

被引:12
|
作者
Pjetursson, Bjarni Elvar [1 ,2 ]
Fehmer, Vincent [2 ]
Sailer, Irena [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iceland, Fac Odontol, Dept Reconstruct Dent, Vatnsmyrarvegi 16, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland
[2] Univ Geneva, Univ Clin Dent Med, Div Fixed Prosthodont & Biomat, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
COMPLETE DIGITAL WORKFLOW; FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES; COMPLICATION RATES; ZIRCONIA ABUTMENTS; VENEERED ZIRCONIA; SURVIVAL; FRACTURE; STRENGTH; CROWNS; RECONSTRUCTIONS;
D O I
10.11607/ijp.8013
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
In recent years, numerous new dental materials have been introduced as alternatives to metal-ceramics for restorations on teeth and implants. This position paper presents the current evidence and respective clinical recommendations of the European Association for Osseointegration (EAO), one of the scientific partners of the International Journal of Prosthodontics, on material selection for single crowns (SCs) and multiple-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Metal-ceramic restorations can be utilized in most clinical indications and are preferred to ceramic restorations in incidences such as long clinical implant crowns; cantilever implant restorations where one implant is supporting two crowns; implant-supported FDPs with extension units extending more than 7 to 8 mm (premolar size); implant-supported FDPs with more than two pontics; and implant-supported FDPs with small connector diameters due to limited intraocclusal space. Veneered or monolithic zirconia-ceramic and veneered or monolithic reinforced glass-ceramic implant-supported SCs are indicated for most SC cases in both the anterior and posterior areas. Today, implant-supported zirconia-ceramic FDPs that are conventionally veneered cannot be considered the material of first priority due to the pronounced risk for fracture of the framework and catastrophic fracture of the veneering material. Monolithic zirconia FDPs are a promising alternative to veneered implant-supported zirconia-ceramic FDPs. The mechanical stability of the translucent and shaded zirconia differs significantly between the grades of translucency. This must always be considered when clinical indications are recommended. As this specific area of prosthodontics is evolving fast, numerous studies evaluating different material options in implant prosthodontics are currently performed worldwide, and future consensus meetings will refine the present recommendations. The EAO will therefore regularly publish updated position papers on relevant topics. Int J Prosthodont 2022,35::7--16. doi: 10.11607/ijp.8013 /
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 16
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient Knowledge and Expectations Prior to Receiving Implant-Supported Restorations
    Simensen, Anja Nyland
    Boe, Olav E.
    Berg, Einar
    Leknes, Knut N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2015, 30 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [22] Fractographic analysis of fractured fixation screws in implant-supported restorations
    Aboushelib, Moustafa N.
    Elraggal, Alaaeldin
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2023, 39 (01) : 123 - 131
  • [23] Magnitude of misfit threshold in implant-supported restorations: A systematic review
    Abdelrehim, Aly
    Etajuri, Enas Abdalla
    Sulaiman, Eshamsul
    Sofian, Hazrina
    Salleh, Nosizana Mohd
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 132 (03): : 528 - 535
  • [24] Utilization of Digital Technologies for Fabrication of Definitive Implant-Supported Restorations
    Ramsey, Christopher D.
    Ritter, Robert G.
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2012, 24 (05) : 299 - 308
  • [25] Comparison of the Effect of Implant Abutment Surface Modifications on the Retention of Implant-Supported Restorations
    Khan, Mohammed Aatif Abid
    Godil, Aamir Zahid
    Wadwan, Sanaa Akhlaq
    Kheur, Mohit Gurunath
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2024, 39 (02) : 278 - 285
  • [26] Verification of the definitive cast during fabrication of implant-supported restorations
    Figueras-Alvarez, Oscar
    Real-Voltas, Francisco
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 125 (04): : 714 - 715
  • [27] The influence of partial implant-supported restorations on chewing side preference
    Nissan, J.
    Berman, O.
    Gross, O.
    Haim, B.
    Chaushu, G.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2011, 38 (03) : 165 - 169
  • [28] Subgingival Microflora in Patients with Implant-Supported Restorations: Preliminary Report
    Zivko-Babic, Jasenka
    Kalenic, Smilja
    Gasparac, Ivo
    Jakovac, Marko
    ACTA STOMATOLOGICA CROATICA, 2006, 40 (03) : 287 - 294
  • [29] Retrievability of implant-supported zirconia restorations cemented on zirconia abutments
    Lennartz, Andrea
    Dohmen, Andrea
    Bishti, Shaza
    Fischer, Horst
    Wolfart, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 120 (05): : 740 - 746
  • [30] Clinically relevant aspects of ceramic materials in implant-supported restorations
    Stawarczyk, Bogna
    Hensel, Justine
    Krywun, Philipp
    Stimmelmayr, Michael
    IMPLANTOLOGIE, 2023, 31 (01): : 7 - 18