Variation in clinical and patient-reported outcomes among complex heart failure with preserved ejection fraction phenotypes

被引:15
|
作者
Flint, Kelsey M. [1 ]
Shah, Sanjiv J. [2 ]
Lewis, Eldrin F. [3 ]
Kao, David P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Rocky Mt Reg VA Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Cardiol 111,Bldg F2,Room 143, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Feinberg Cardiovasc Res Inst,Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Div Cardiol, Sch Med, Aurora, CO USA
来源
ESC HEART FAILURE | 2020年 / 7卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
HFpEF; Health status; Mortality; Hospitalization; Heart failure; CITY CARDIOMYOPATHY QUESTIONNAIRE; TOPCAT; SPIRONOLACTONE; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/ehf2.12660
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims The aim of this study is to use six previously described heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) phenotypes to describe differences in (i) the biological response to spironolactone, (ii) clinical endpoints, and (iii) patient-reported health status by HFpEF phenotype and treatment arm in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial (TOPCAT). Methods and results We analysed 1767 patients in TOPCAT from the Americas. Using 11 clinical variables, patients were classified according to six HFpEF phenotypes previously identified in the I-PRESERVE and CHARM-Preserved studies. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) measured health status. All phenotypes showed increase in potassium with spironolactone, although only three phenotypes showed significant increase in creatinine, and two phenotypes showed significant decrease in systolic blood pressure. Rate of the TOPCAT primary outcome (cardiovascular death, aborted cardiac arrest, or heart failure hospitalization) differed by HFpEF phenotype (P < 0.001) but not by treatment arm within each HFpEF phenotype. Baseline KCCQ score differed by HFpEF phenotype (P < 0.001), although some phenotypes with poor health status had lower rates of the TOPCAT primary outcome, and some phenotypes with better health status had higher rates of the TOPCAT primary outcome. However, within 3/6 phenotypes, higher baseline KCCQ score was associated with lower risk of the TOPCAT primary outcome. Change in KCCQ scores at 4 and 12 months did not differ among HFpEF phenotypes overall or by treatment arm. Conclusions Complex, data-driven HFpEF phenotypes differ according to biological response to spironolactone, baseline health status, and clinical endpoints. These differences may inform the design of targeted clinical trials focusing on improvement in outcomes most relevant for specific HFpEF phenotypes.
引用
收藏
页码:811 / 824
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Major depression and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Liu, Jian
    Guo, Zejun
    Fan, Meida
    Liang, Weihao
    He, Xin
    Wu, Dexi
    Dong, Yugang
    Zhu, Wengen
    Liu, Chen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2021, 51 (03)
  • [42] Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A clinical crisis
    Banerjee, Prithwish
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 204 : 198 - 199
  • [43] Clinical Update in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Krittanawong, Chayakrit
    Britt, William Michael
    Rizwan, Affan
    Siddiqui, Rehma
    Khawaja, Muzamil
    Khan, Rabisa
    Joolharzadeh, Pouya
    Newman, Noah
    Rivera, Mario Rodriguez
    Tang, W. H. Wilson
    CURRENT HEART FAILURE REPORTS, 2024, 21 (05) : 461 - 484
  • [44] Clinical Phenogroups in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Sorimachi, Hidemi
    Omote, Kazunori
    Borlaug, Barry A.
    HEART FAILURE CLINICS, 2021, 17 (03) : 483 - 498
  • [45] Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a clinical dilemma
    Komajda, Michel
    Lam, Carolyn S. P.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (16) : 1022 - +
  • [46] Inpatient Clinical Outcomes in the Elderly Patients with Heart Failure: Preserved Ejection Fraction versus Reduced Ejection Fraction
    Patel, Jigar J.
    Alzahrani, Talal
    Ryan, Angela
    Krepp, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2019, 25 (08) : S89 - S89
  • [47] Heart failure with supranormal ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and outcomes compared to mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction
    Segev, Amitai
    Ishay, Rotem Tal-Ben
    Metra, Marco
    Maor, Elad
    Freimark, Dov
    Younis, Anan
    Beigel, Roy
    Matetzky, Shlomi
    Grupper, Avishay
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [48] Obese-Inflammatory Phenotypes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Sabbah, Michael S.
    Fayyaz, Ahmed U.
    de Denus, Simon
    Felker, G. Michael
    Borlaug, Barry A.
    Dasari, Surendra
    Carter, Rickey E.
    Redfield, Margaret M.
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2020, 13 (08) : E006414
  • [49] Threonine in different phenotypes of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Petruhnova, Maria F.
    Krivova, Anastasia, V
    Zektser, Vita Yu.
    Korobkova, Ekaterina O.
    Edniev, Tamerlan N.
    Ageev, Anton A.
    Shestakova, Ksenia M.
    Moskaleva, Natalya E.
    Appolonova, Svetlana A.
    Belenkov, Yury N.
    Kozhevnikova, Maria, V
    RUSSIAN OPEN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 13 (03)
  • [50] Chronotropic incompetence: rediscovering phenotypes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Jimenez-Marrero, Santiago
    Ramos, Raul
    Comin-Colet, Josep
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2023, 76 (07): : 497 - 499