Variation in clinical and patient-reported outcomes among complex heart failure with preserved ejection fraction phenotypes

被引:15
|
作者
Flint, Kelsey M. [1 ]
Shah, Sanjiv J. [2 ]
Lewis, Eldrin F. [3 ]
Kao, David P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Rocky Mt Reg VA Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Cardiol 111,Bldg F2,Room 143, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Feinberg Cardiovasc Res Inst,Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Div Cardiol, Sch Med, Aurora, CO USA
来源
ESC HEART FAILURE | 2020年 / 7卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
HFpEF; Health status; Mortality; Hospitalization; Heart failure; CITY CARDIOMYOPATHY QUESTIONNAIRE; TOPCAT; SPIRONOLACTONE; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/ehf2.12660
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims The aim of this study is to use six previously described heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) phenotypes to describe differences in (i) the biological response to spironolactone, (ii) clinical endpoints, and (iii) patient-reported health status by HFpEF phenotype and treatment arm in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial (TOPCAT). Methods and results We analysed 1767 patients in TOPCAT from the Americas. Using 11 clinical variables, patients were classified according to six HFpEF phenotypes previously identified in the I-PRESERVE and CHARM-Preserved studies. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) measured health status. All phenotypes showed increase in potassium with spironolactone, although only three phenotypes showed significant increase in creatinine, and two phenotypes showed significant decrease in systolic blood pressure. Rate of the TOPCAT primary outcome (cardiovascular death, aborted cardiac arrest, or heart failure hospitalization) differed by HFpEF phenotype (P < 0.001) but not by treatment arm within each HFpEF phenotype. Baseline KCCQ score differed by HFpEF phenotype (P < 0.001), although some phenotypes with poor health status had lower rates of the TOPCAT primary outcome, and some phenotypes with better health status had higher rates of the TOPCAT primary outcome. However, within 3/6 phenotypes, higher baseline KCCQ score was associated with lower risk of the TOPCAT primary outcome. Change in KCCQ scores at 4 and 12 months did not differ among HFpEF phenotypes overall or by treatment arm. Conclusions Complex, data-driven HFpEF phenotypes differ according to biological response to spironolactone, baseline health status, and clinical endpoints. These differences may inform the design of targeted clinical trials focusing on improvement in outcomes most relevant for specific HFpEF phenotypes.
引用
收藏
页码:811 / 824
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE AND PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION IN CHINESE
    Li Longgui
    Geng Zhaohua
    Zhao Xiaohui
    Li Hongmei
    Dang Tao
    HEART, 2011, 97
  • [22] Patient Selection in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Clinical Trials
    Kelly, Jacob P.
    Mentz, Robert J.
    Mebazaa, Alexandre
    Voors, Adriaan A.
    Butler, Javed
    Roessig, Lothar
    Fiuzat, Mona
    Zannad, Faiez
    Pitt, Bertram
    O'Connor, Christopher M.
    Lam, Carolyn S. P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 65 (16) : 1668 - 1682
  • [23] Clinical phenotypes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a cluster analysis of the swedish heart failure registry
    Uijl, A. Alicia
    Lund, L. H.
    Brugts, J. J.
    Linssen, G. C. M.
    Vaartjes, I.
    Asselbergs, F. W.
    Dahlstrom, U.
    Van Empel, V.
    Rocca, H. P. Brunner-La
    Hoes, A. W.
    Koudstaal, S.
    Savarese, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2020, 22 : 140 - 140
  • [24] Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and its different phenotypes
    Camafort, Miguel
    Suarez-Lombrana, Ana
    Coloma, Emmanuel
    REVISTA DE LA FEDERACION ARGENTINA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2023, 52 (03): : 111 - 116
  • [25] Comparison of New York Heart Association Class and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
    Figueroa, Jose F.
    Wadhera, Rishi K.
    Joynt Maddox, Karen
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 6 (06) : 725 - 726
  • [26] Effect of Atrial Fibrillation on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Secondary Analysis of Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) Trial
    Elkholey, Khaled
    Whyte, Seabrook
    Asad, Zain Ul Abideen
    Thadani, Udho
    Stavrakis, Stavros
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [27] Gender and Racial Disparities in Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure
    Diala, Chiamaka S.
    Chukwuma, Vivian
    Lukan, Abdulkareem
    Sanni, Habeeb
    Aibangbee, Keziah
    Fasanmi, Oluwafisayo
    Eromosele, Oseiwe
    Ogunsua, Adedotun A.
    Olagoke, Olakanmi
    Abu, Hawa O.
    Igbinomwanhia, Efehi
    CIRCULATION, 2020, 142
  • [28] Comparison of New York Heart Association Class and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
    Greene, Stephen J.
    Butler, Javed
    Spertus, John A.
    Hellkamp, Anne S.
    Vaduganathan, Muthiah
    DeVore, Adam D.
    Albert, Nancy M.
    Duffy, Carol I.
    Patterson, J. Herbert
    Thomas, Laine
    Williams, Fredonia B.
    Hernandez, Adrian F.
    Fonarow, Gregg C.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 6 (05) : 522 - 531
  • [29] Real-world evidence for patient phenotypes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Balitzki, J.
    Schaper, S.
    Roessig, L.
    Sandner, P.
    Thum, T.
    Bauersachs, J.
    Mondritzki, T.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 45
  • [30] CHANGES IN LEFT VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION AND OUTCOMES AMONG OUTPATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE AND PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION
    Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P.
    Kim, Samuel
    Rawal, Sahil
    Tangutoori, Rasika
    Jadonath, Arvin
    Georgiopoulou, Vasiliki
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 679 - 679