Peer review of electronic journals

被引:0
|
作者
Rowland, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Loughborough, Dept Informat Sci, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
关键词
peer review; costs; refereeing; editing; electronic scholarly journals;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The recent literature about peer review of scholarly articles is reviewed, with particular emphasis on the cost of the peer-review process. Possible impacts of electronic scholarly publishing upon peer reviewing are discussed. Opinion amongst academics in their roles as authors, editors and referees seems likely to insist upon preservation of a pre-publication refereeing system in most disciplines. As the administration of any such system seems to have a cost of about $400 per published article, any scholarly publishing system will need to locate financial support to at least that extent, and a system of lump-sum payment by the authors' funders is best placed to cover this cost while providing universal free access to scholarly material.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 81
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A system for electronic peer review
    Cohen, AG
    IMPACT OF ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING ON THE ACADEMIC COMMUNITY, 1998, 73 : 69 - 71
  • [42] Electronic publishing and peer review
    Jefferson, PG
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1998, 78 (04) : 515 - 516
  • [43] Peer review and electronic publishing
    Zinn-Justin, J
    IMPACT OF ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING ON THE ACADEMIC COMMUNITY, 1998, 73 : 71 - 76
  • [44] Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals
    Wicherts, Jelte M.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (01):
  • [45] The Discourse of Peer Review: Reviewing Submissions to Academic Journals
    Hedgcock, John S.
    JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2019, 43 : 88 - 90
  • [46] Pro-active peer review for premier journals
    Lim, Weng Marc
    INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2021, 95 : 65 - 69
  • [47] Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process
    Jim Giles
    Nature, 2006, 439 : 252 - 252
  • [48] Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals
    Baggs, Judith Gedney
    Broome, Marion E.
    Dougherty, Molly C.
    Freda, Margaret C.
    Kearney, Margaret H.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 64 (02) : 131 - 138
  • [49] Journals must expand access to peer review data
    Smith, Olivia M.
    Davis, Kayla L.
    Waterman, Robin
    Pizza, Riley B.
    Mack, Caitlin
    Conway, Emily E.
    Dobson, Kara C.
    Foster, Brianna
    Hristova, Ani E.
    Jarvey, Julie C.
    Nourn, Nan
    Davis, Courtney L.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2024, 39 (04) : 311 - 314
  • [50] Civil, sensible, and constructive peer review in APS journals
    Raff, Hershel
    Brown, Dennis
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 305 (03): : H265 - H266