Peer review of electronic journals

被引:0
|
作者
Rowland, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Loughborough, Dept Informat Sci, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
关键词
peer review; costs; refereeing; editing; electronic scholarly journals;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The recent literature about peer review of scholarly articles is reviewed, with particular emphasis on the cost of the peer-review process. Possible impacts of electronic scholarly publishing upon peer reviewing are discussed. Opinion amongst academics in their roles as authors, editors and referees seems likely to insist upon preservation of a pre-publication refereeing system in most disciplines. As the administration of any such system seems to have a cost of about $400 per published article, any scholarly publishing system will need to locate financial support to at least that extent, and a system of lump-sum payment by the authors' funders is best placed to cover this cost while providing universal free access to scholarly material.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 81
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE UNIQUE ROLE OF PEER-REVIEW JOURNALS
    SOFFER, A
    CHEST, 1980, 78 (04) : 547 - 548
  • [32] Peer review delay and selectivity in ecology journals
    Pautasso, Marco
    Schaefer, Hanno
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, 84 (02) : 307 - 315
  • [33] The Peer Review Process in Science Education Journals
    Dale Baker
    Research in Science Education, 2002, 32 : 171 - 180
  • [34] Peer review policies in medical student journals
    Al-Busaidi, Ibrahim S.
    Alamri, Yassar
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 94 (1112) : 362 - 363
  • [35] Peer review practices by medical imaging journals
    Kwee, Thomas C.
    Adams, Hugo J. A.
    Kwee, Robert M.
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [37] Publishing in peer review journals - Criteria for success
    Mclntyre, Ellen
    Eckermann, Sarah Louise
    Keane, Miriam
    Magarey, Anne
    Roeger, Leigh
    AUSTRALIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2007, 36 (07) : 561 - 562
  • [38] Peer review practices by medical imaging journals
    Thomas C. Kwee
    Hugo J. A. Adams
    Robert M. Kwee
    Insights into Imaging, 11
  • [39] Peer Review Interactions for Malaysian Journals: The Revamped Open-Peer Review Process
    Ahmad, Jasni
    Shiratuddin, Norshuhada
    WCECS 2008: WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2008, : 487 - 490
  • [40] How to review manuscripts? A cornerstone for peer-review journals
    Pongracz, Peter
    Camerlink, Irene
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2021, 240