Assessing Rural Health Coalitions Using the Public Health Logic Model: A Systematic Review

被引:4
|
作者
Ken-Opurum, Jennifer [1 ]
Darbishire, Lily [1 ]
Miller, Douglas K. [2 ,3 ]
Savaiano, Dennis [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Nutr Sci, 700 West State St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Regenstrief Inst, Ctr Aging Res, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
CANCER DISPARITIES; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; COMMUNITY; LEADERSHIP; PARTNERSHIPS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2020.01.015
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Context: Rural communities face unique challenges including fewer healthcare providers and restricted access to nutritious foods, likely leading to poor health outcomes. Community health coalitions are groups of local organizations partnering to address local health needs. Employing such coalitions is one strategy for implementing policy-system-environment changes for improving rural health. However, their success is variable without standardized evaluation. In this review, rural community health coalitions were retrospectively assessed using the W.K. Kellogg Foundation Logic Model. Community health coalition-reported pathways through this model were explored using market basket analysis. Evidence acquisition: During Spring 2018, PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched for (coalition) AND (rural) AND (health) AND (effectiveness OR impact OR outcome OR logic model). Full-text, peer-reviewed, English articles meeting PICOS criteria (Population, rural communities; Intervention, presence of a community health coalition; Comparator, the coalition over time; Outcomes, logic model pathways) were reviewed. During Summer and Fall 2018, coalition-reported pathways were categorized according to logic model inputs and resources; internal and external activities; outputs; short-, medium-, and long-term outcomes; and impact. Market basket analysis was conducted during Winter 2018. Evidence synthesis: The 10 most frequently reported pathway items were partner diversity; organizational structures; implementing pilot studies, programs, and interventions; funding; community engagement and outreach; university partners; holding regular meetings; having working groups and subcommittees; operating under or partnering with a regional research initiative; and conducting a community health and needs assessment. Half of community health coalitions reported 4 or more of the following: funding; partner diversity; university partners; organizational structures; community engagement and outreach; and implementing pilot studies, programs, and interventions. Conclusions: Many rural community health coalitions reported inputs and capacity building; few impacted health. Recommending common early phase logic model pathways may facilitate downstream success. (C) 2020 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:864 / 878
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Essential skills for using research evidence in public health policy: a systematic review
    Ziam, Saliha
    Gignac, Pierre
    Courant, Elodie
    Sween-Cadieux, Esther Mc
    [J]. EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2021, 17 (04): : 567 - 591
  • [42] Using theory of change to design and evaluate public health interventions: a systematic review
    Erica Breuer
    Lucy Lee
    Mary De Silva
    Crick Lund
    [J]. Implementation Science, 11
  • [43] Public health education using social learning theory: a systematic scoping review
    Liu, Ting
    Pang, Patrick Cheong-Iao
    Lam, Chi-Kin
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [44] Using theory of change to design and evaluate public health interventions: a systematic review
    Breuer, Erica
    Lee, Lucy
    De Silva, Mary
    Lund, Crick
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2016, 11
  • [45] The logic model for Uganda's health sector preparedness for public health threats and emergencies
    Ario, Alex Riolexus
    Makumbi, Issa
    Bulage, Lilian
    Kyazze, Simon
    Kayiwa, Joshua
    Wetaka, Milton Makoba
    Kasule, Juliet Namugga
    Ocom, Felix
    [J]. GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2019, 12 (01)
  • [46] Preconception health interventions delivered in public health and community settings: A systematic review
    Hilary K. Brown
    Melissa Mueller
    Sarah Edwards
    Catriona Mill
    Joanne Enders
    Lisa Graves
    Deanna Telner
    Cindy-Lee Dennis
    [J]. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 2017, 108 : 388 - 397
  • [47] PUBLIC HEALTH POLICIES FOR ORAL HEALTH IN INDIA: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW & META ANALYSIS
    Swathi, Dadi
    Desai, Disha
    Shetty, Akhil
    Patyal, Neha
    Kar, SouvagyaRanjan
    Manik, Amit
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2022, 14 (02) : 6829 - 6839
  • [48] Training Public Health Students in Racial Justice and Health Equity A Systematic Review
    Chandler, Caroline E.
    Williams, Caitlin R.
    Turner, Mallory W.
    Shanahan, Meghan E.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2022, 137 (02) : 375 - 385
  • [49] Preconception health interventions delivered in public health and community settings: A systematic review
    Brown, Hilary K.
    Mueller, Melissa
    Edwards, Sarah
    Mill, Catriona
    Enders, Joanne
    Graves, Lisa
    Telner, Deanna
    Dennis, Cindy-Lee
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2017, 108 (04): : E388 - E397
  • [50] Economic evaluations of public health interventions for mental health: A systematic literature review
    Feldman, I.
    Gebreslassie, M.
    Sampaio, F.
    Nystrand, C.
    Ssegonja, R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30