Assessing Rural Health Coalitions Using the Public Health Logic Model: A Systematic Review

被引:4
|
作者
Ken-Opurum, Jennifer [1 ]
Darbishire, Lily [1 ]
Miller, Douglas K. [2 ,3 ]
Savaiano, Dennis [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Nutr Sci, 700 West State St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Regenstrief Inst, Ctr Aging Res, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
CANCER DISPARITIES; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; COMMUNITY; LEADERSHIP; PARTNERSHIPS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2020.01.015
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Context: Rural communities face unique challenges including fewer healthcare providers and restricted access to nutritious foods, likely leading to poor health outcomes. Community health coalitions are groups of local organizations partnering to address local health needs. Employing such coalitions is one strategy for implementing policy-system-environment changes for improving rural health. However, their success is variable without standardized evaluation. In this review, rural community health coalitions were retrospectively assessed using the W.K. Kellogg Foundation Logic Model. Community health coalition-reported pathways through this model were explored using market basket analysis. Evidence acquisition: During Spring 2018, PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched for (coalition) AND (rural) AND (health) AND (effectiveness OR impact OR outcome OR logic model). Full-text, peer-reviewed, English articles meeting PICOS criteria (Population, rural communities; Intervention, presence of a community health coalition; Comparator, the coalition over time; Outcomes, logic model pathways) were reviewed. During Summer and Fall 2018, coalition-reported pathways were categorized according to logic model inputs and resources; internal and external activities; outputs; short-, medium-, and long-term outcomes; and impact. Market basket analysis was conducted during Winter 2018. Evidence synthesis: The 10 most frequently reported pathway items were partner diversity; organizational structures; implementing pilot studies, programs, and interventions; funding; community engagement and outreach; university partners; holding regular meetings; having working groups and subcommittees; operating under or partnering with a regional research initiative; and conducting a community health and needs assessment. Half of community health coalitions reported 4 or more of the following: funding; partner diversity; university partners; organizational structures; community engagement and outreach; and implementing pilot studies, programs, and interventions. Conclusions: Many rural community health coalitions reported inputs and capacity building; few impacted health. Recommending common early phase logic model pathways may facilitate downstream success. (C) 2020 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:864 / 878
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models
    Kristine Sørensen
    Stephan Van den Broucke
    James Fullam
    Gerardine Doyle
    Jürgen Pelikan
    Zofia Slonska
    Helmut Brand
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 12
  • [22] Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models
    Sorensen, Kristine
    Van den Broucke, Stephan
    Fullam, James
    Doyle, Gerardine
    Pelikan, Juergen
    Slonska, Zofia
    Brand, Helmut
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 12
  • [23] THE DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMATIC TRAINING IN RURAL PUBLIC HEALTH WORK IN CHINA
    Ch'en, C. C.
    [J]. MILBANK MEMORIAL FUND QUARTERLY, 1936, 14 (04): : 370 - 387
  • [24] A Model of Social Media Effects in Public Health Communication Campaigns: Systematic Review
    Kite, James
    Chan, Lilian
    MacKay, Kathryn
    Corbett, Lucy
    Reyes-Marcelino, Gillian
    Nguyen, Binh
    Bellew, William
    Freeman, Becky
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [25] The PRECEDE-PROCEED model as a tool in Public Health screening: a systematic review
    Saulle, R.
    Sinopoli, A.
    Baer, A. De Paula
    Mannocci, A.
    Marino, M.
    de Belvis, A. G.
    Federici, A.
    La Torre, G.
    [J]. CLINICA TERAPEUTICA, 2020, 171 (02): : E167 - E177
  • [26] THE ROLE OF DIGITAL HEALTH IN RURAL ONCOLOGY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Morris, Bonny B.
    Kim, Sunny Jung
    Fuemmeler, Bernard F.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2019, 53 : S8 - S8
  • [27] Health literacy in rural and urban populations: A systematic review
    Aljassim, Noor
    Ostini, Remo
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (10) : 2142 - 2154
  • [28] Rural Latino health and the built environment: a systematic review
    Stone, Garrett A.
    Fernandez, Mariela
    DeSantiago, Alondra
    [J]. ETHNICITY & HEALTH, 2019, : 1 - 26
  • [29] Public health interventions in midwifery: a systematic review of systematic reviews
    McNeill, Jenny
    Lynn, Fiona
    Alderdice, Fiona
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 12
  • [30] Improving the health of people with intellectual disabilities using a public health nursing approach: Systematic literature review
    Mafuba, Kudzai
    Kupara, Dorothy
    Kudita, Chiedza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2021, 34 (05) : 1272 - 1272