Long-Term Kidney Allograft Function and Survival in Prednisone-Free Regimens: Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Tacrolimus/Sirolimus

被引:30
|
作者
Chhabra, Darshika [1 ]
Skaro, Anton I. [2 ]
Leventhal, Joseph R. [2 ]
Dalal, Pranav [3 ]
Shah, Gaurav [4 ]
Wang, Edward [2 ]
Gallon, Lorenzo [2 ]
机构
[1] Advocate Christ Med Ctr, Oak Lawn, IL USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Comprehens Transplant Ctr, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Univ Missouri Hosp, Columbia, MO USA
[4] Mt Sinai Hosp, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
MYCOPHENOLATE-MOFETIL; CALCINEURIN INHIBITORS; RENAL-FUNCTION; SIROLIMUS; CYCLOSPORINE; COMBINATION; TRANSPLANTATION; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; NEPHROTOXICITY; GRAFT;
D O I
10.2215/CJN.06940711
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objectives The optimal maintenance immunosuppressive regimen to improve long-term renal allograft function and graft survival is yet to be determined. Design, setting, participants, & measurements This observational study prospectively compared tacrolimus/sirolimus with tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients using a prednisone-free regimen with over 8.5 years of follow-up. Patients received methylprednisonlone and anti-IL2 receptor antagonist (Basiliximab) induction and were blindly randomized to either the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (n=45) or tacrolimus/sirolimus (n=37) groups. Outcome measures included patient and renal allograft survival, incidence of acute rejection, and estimated GFR. Results The tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group compared with the tacrolimus/sirolimus group had overall better renal allograft survival (91% versus 70%, P=0.02); 13 patients (35.1%) in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group and 8 patients (17.8%) in the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group experienced biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (P=0.07). By 3 months post-transplant, estimated GFR was significantly lower in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group compared with the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group (47.7 versus 59.6 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), P=0.0002), and this trend persisted throughout the follow-up period. Also, the slope of decline in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group was significantly steeper than in the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group. Conclusions This study shows that, in a prednisone-free immunosuppressive regimen, long-term renal graft survival and function are significantly worse in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group than the tacrolirnus/ mycophenolate mofetil group. The synergistic nephrotoxic effect and higher acute rejection rates in the tacrolimus/sirolimus compared with the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group adversely affect graft survival. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7: 504-512, 2012. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06940711
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 512
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Long-term outcome of adding mycophenolate mofetil to tacrolimus for nephrotoxicity following liver transplantation
    Jain, A
    Vekatramanan, R
    Eghtesad, B
    Gadomski, M
    Mohanka, R
    Marcos, A
    Fung, J
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 80 (06) : 859 - 864
  • [32] The use of sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil is associated with improved renal function, but similar metabolic profiles to sirolimus and tacrolimus
    Lo, A
    Egidi, MF
    Gross, B
    Amiri, HS
    Vera, S
    Nezakatgoo, N
    Gaber, AO
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 : 544 - 544
  • [34] Tacrolimus/steroids/mycophenolate mofetil vs. tacrolimus/steroids: Long term impact on rejection.
    Rivera, M
    Luke, PP
    Shapiro, R
    Vivas, CA
    Scantlebury, VP
    Starzl, TE
    Hakala, TR
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (08) : S115 - S115
  • [35] Withdrawal of steroids: A randomized prospective study of prednisone and tacrolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients with autoimmune hepatitis
    Junge, G
    Neuhaus, R
    Schewior, L
    Klupp, J
    Guckelberger, O
    Langrehr, JM
    Tullius, S
    Neuhaus, P
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (04) : 1695 - 1696
  • [36] A Randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus/sirolimus versus tacrolimums/mycophenolate versus cyclosporine/sirolimus in renal transplantation: Three-year analysis
    Ciancio, G
    Burke, GW
    Gaynor, JJ
    Ruiz, P
    Roth, D
    Kupin, W
    Rosen, A
    Miller, J
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 81 (06) : 845 - 852
  • [37] Struggle for (Graft-) Survival: Long-Term Results Comparing Standard Therapy With Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus De-Novo Low-Dose Tacrolimus/Sirolimus Therapy 10 Years After Heart Transplantation
    Guethoff, S.
    Stroeh, K.
    Koenig, M.
    Meiser, B. M.
    Zaruba, M.
    Grinninger, C.
    Reichart, B.
    Ueberfuhr, P.
    Hagl, C.
    Kaczmarek, I.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 33 (04): : S134 - S134
  • [38] Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: Results at 6 months
    Gonwa, T
    Mendez, R
    Yang, HC
    Weinstein, S
    Jensik, S
    Steinberg, S
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (08) : 1213 - 1220
  • [39] Impact of Mycophenolate Mofetil Dose Reduction on Allograft Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients on Tacrolimus-Based Regimens: A Systematic Review
    Su, Victoria C. H.
    Greanya, Erica D.
    Ensom, Mary H. H.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2011, 45 (02) : 248 - 257
  • [40] Mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus compared with azathioprine in long-term maintenance treatment for active lupus nephritis
    Qianying Zhang
    Peng Xing
    Hong Ren
    Xiaonong Chen
    Jingyuan Xie
    Wen Zhang
    Pingyan Shen
    Xiao Li
    Nan Chen
    Frontiers of Medicine, 2022, 16 : 799 - 807