Long-Term Kidney Allograft Function and Survival in Prednisone-Free Regimens: Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Tacrolimus/Sirolimus

被引:30
|
作者
Chhabra, Darshika [1 ]
Skaro, Anton I. [2 ]
Leventhal, Joseph R. [2 ]
Dalal, Pranav [3 ]
Shah, Gaurav [4 ]
Wang, Edward [2 ]
Gallon, Lorenzo [2 ]
机构
[1] Advocate Christ Med Ctr, Oak Lawn, IL USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Comprehens Transplant Ctr, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Univ Missouri Hosp, Columbia, MO USA
[4] Mt Sinai Hosp, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
MYCOPHENOLATE-MOFETIL; CALCINEURIN INHIBITORS; RENAL-FUNCTION; SIROLIMUS; CYCLOSPORINE; COMBINATION; TRANSPLANTATION; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; NEPHROTOXICITY; GRAFT;
D O I
10.2215/CJN.06940711
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objectives The optimal maintenance immunosuppressive regimen to improve long-term renal allograft function and graft survival is yet to be determined. Design, setting, participants, & measurements This observational study prospectively compared tacrolimus/sirolimus with tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients using a prednisone-free regimen with over 8.5 years of follow-up. Patients received methylprednisonlone and anti-IL2 receptor antagonist (Basiliximab) induction and were blindly randomized to either the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (n=45) or tacrolimus/sirolimus (n=37) groups. Outcome measures included patient and renal allograft survival, incidence of acute rejection, and estimated GFR. Results The tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group compared with the tacrolimus/sirolimus group had overall better renal allograft survival (91% versus 70%, P=0.02); 13 patients (35.1%) in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group and 8 patients (17.8%) in the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group experienced biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (P=0.07). By 3 months post-transplant, estimated GFR was significantly lower in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group compared with the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group (47.7 versus 59.6 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), P=0.0002), and this trend persisted throughout the follow-up period. Also, the slope of decline in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group was significantly steeper than in the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group. Conclusions This study shows that, in a prednisone-free immunosuppressive regimen, long-term renal graft survival and function are significantly worse in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group than the tacrolirnus/ mycophenolate mofetil group. The synergistic nephrotoxic effect and higher acute rejection rates in the tacrolimus/sirolimus compared with the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group adversely affect graft survival. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7: 504-512, 2012. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06940711
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 512
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A prospective randomized trial of tacrolimus and prednisone versus tacrolimus, prednisone, and mycophenolate mofetil in primary adult liver transplant recipients - An interim report
    Jain, AB
    Hamad, I
    Rakela, J
    Dodson, F
    Kramer, D
    Demetris, J
    McMichael, J
    Starzl, TE
    Fung, JJ
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (10) : 1395 - 1398
  • [22] Prospective randomized trial of tacrolimus and prednisone versus tacrolimus, prednisone, and mycophenolate mofetil: Complete report on 350 primary adult liver transplantations
    Jain, A
    Kashyap, R
    Kramer, D
    Dodson, F
    Hamad, I
    Starzl, TE
    Fung, JJ
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) : 1342 - 1344
  • [23] A prospective randomized trial of tacrolimus and prednisone versus tacrolimus, prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil in primary adult liver transplantation: A single center report
    Jain, A
    Kashyap, R
    Dodson, F
    Kramer, D
    Hamad, I
    Khan, A
    Eghestad, B
    Starzl, TE
    Fung, JJ
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 72 (06) : 1091 - 1097
  • [24] Tacrolimus/Sirolimus Versus Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate in Kidney Transplantation: Improved 3-Year Graft and Patient Survival in Recent Era
    Gralla, Jane
    Wiseman, Alexander C.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 87 (11) : 1712 - 1719
  • [25] Kidney transplantation during the first trimester of pregnancy:: Immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and prednisone
    Pérgola, PE
    Kancharla, A
    Riley, DJ
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 71 (07) : 994 - 997
  • [26] Mycophenolate Mofetil Enhances the Negative Effects of Sirolimus and Tacrolimus on Rat Kidney Cell Metabolism
    Klawitter, Jelena
    Klawitter, Jost
    Schmitz, Volker
    Shokati, Touraj
    Epshtein, Ekaterina
    Thurman, Joshua M.
    Christians, Uwe
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01):
  • [27] Renal function following kidney transplantation is equally good regardless of whether tacrolimus is combined with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil
    van Gurp, Eveline
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 20 : 25 - 25
  • [28] Long-term prednisolone withdrawal after pancreas and kidney transplantation in patients treated with ATG, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil
    Kahl, A
    Bechstein, WO
    Lorenz, F
    Steinberg, J
    Pohle, C
    Kampf, D
    Müller, A
    Settmacher, U
    Neuhaus, P
    Frei, U
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) : 1694 - 1695
  • [29] Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus Versus Mycophenolate in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Tacrolimus
    Ficher, Klaus Nunes
    Dreige, Yasmin
    Gessolo Lins, Paulo Ricardo
    Ferreira, Alexandra Nicolau
    de Rezende Freschi, Juliana Toniato
    Linhares, Kamilla
    Martins, Suelen Stopa
    Custodio, Luciana
    Cristelli, Marina
    Viana, Laila
    Santos, Daniel Wagner
    de Marco, Renato
    Gerbase-DeLima, Maria
    Proenca, Henrique
    Aguiar, Wilson
    Nakamura, Monica
    Felipe, Claudia Rosso
    Pestana, Jose Medina
    Silva Jr, Helio Tedesco
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 106 (02) : 381 - 390
  • [30] The ORION Study: Comparison of Two Sirolimus-Based Regimens versus Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Renal Allograft Recipients (vol 11, pg 1633, 2011)
    Flechner, S. M.
    Glyda, M.
    Cockfield, S.
    Grinyo, J.
    Legendre, C. H.
    Russ, G.
    Steinberg, S.
    Wissing, K. M.
    Tai, S. S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 12 (01) : 268 - 268