Postoperative range of motion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autograft hamstrings - A prospective, randomized clinical trial of early versus delayed reconstructions

被引:95
|
作者
Bottoni, Craig R. [1 ]
Liddell, Travis R. [2 ]
Trainor, Timothy J. [2 ]
Freccero, David M. [2 ]
Lindell, Kenneth K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Qatar Orthopaed & Sports Med Ctr, Doha, Qatar
[2] Tripler Army Med Ctr, Honolulu, HI 96859 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2008年 / 36卷 / 04期
关键词
ACL; timing; hamstring; acute;
D O I
10.1177/0363546507312164
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is a common belief that surgical reconstruction of an acutely torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) should be delayed for at least 3 weeks because of the increased incidence of postoperative motion loss (arthrofibrosis) and suboptimal clinical results. Hypothesis: There is no difference in postoperative range of motion or stability after ACL reconstructions performed either acutely or delayed. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Patients with an acute ACL tear were prospectively randomized to either early ( within 21days) or delayed ( beyond 6 weeks) reconstruction using autograft hamstring tendon. Previous knee surgery on the index extremity and a multiligamentous injury were exclusionary criteria. Surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation were identical for all patients. Postoperative assessments included range of motion and KT-1000 arthrometer measurements compared with the contralateral knee. Standardized outcome measures were used including single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE), Lysholm, and Tegner Activity Score. Results: Seventy consecutive patients were enrolled, and 1 patient was dropped after a postoperative infection. Sixty-nine patients ( 34 acute, 35 delayed) with an average age of 27 years composed the study cohort. The mean time from injury to surgery was 9 days ( range, 2-17 days) for patients in the early group and 85 days (range, 42-192) for those in the delayed group. The average follow-up from surgery was 366 days ( range, 185-869). Articular cartilage and meniscal injuries were comparable between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences between the 2 treatment groups in degrees of extension or flexion lost relative to the nonoperative side, operative time, KT-1000 arthrometer differences, or subjective knee evaluations. Conclusion: Excellent clinical results can be achieved after ACL reconstructions performed soon after injury using autograft hamstrings. Although the authors do not advocate that all reconstructions should be performed acutely, they found that early ACL reconstructions do not result in loss of motion or suboptimal clinical results as long as a rehabilitation protocol emphasizing extension and early range of motion is employed.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 662
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Open Kinetic Chain Exercises in a Restricted Range of Motion After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Fukuda, Thiago Yukio
    Fingerhut, Deborah
    Moreira, Viviane Coimbra
    Ferreira Camarini, Paula Maria
    Scodeller, Nathalia Folco
    Duarte, Aires, Jr.
    Martinelli, Mauro
    Bryk, Flavio Fernandes
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (04): : 788 - 794
  • [32] Autograft Versus Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study With a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up
    Bottoni, Craig R.
    Smith, Eric L.
    Shaha, James
    Shaha, Steven S.
    Raybin, Sarah G.
    Tokish, John M.
    Rowles, Douglas J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (10): : 2501 - 2509
  • [33] Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Hamstring Tendons Autograft: A Retrospective Analysis
    Aslam, Mohd A.
    Avasthi, Sachin
    Aggarwal, Pankaj
    Singh, Satyam
    Kumar, Vineet
    Mahapatra, Swagat
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [34] Anterior cruciate ligament injuries treated with quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring autograft: A randomized controlled trial
    Vilchez-Cavazos, Felix
    Davila-Martinez, Agustin
    de la Garza-Castro, Santiago
    Simental-Mendia, Mario
    Garay-Mendoza, Domingo
    Tamez-Mata, Yadira
    Pena-Martinez, Victor
    Acosta-Olivo, Carlos
    CIRUGIA Y CIRUJANOS, 2020, 88 (01): : 76 - 81
  • [35] Knee isokinetic performance following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus hamstrings graft
    Machado, Felipe
    Debieux, Pedro
    Kaleka, Camila Cohen
    Astur, Diego
    Peccin, Maria Stella
    Cohen, Moises
    PHYSICIAN AND SPORTSMEDICINE, 2018, 46 (01): : 30 - 35
  • [36] Intra-articular Drain versus No Drain after Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial
    El Khalifa, Tarek
    Al Mahozi, Ahmed
    Dhaif, Bassim
    BAHRAIN MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2008, 30 (01)
  • [37] Intra-articular drain versus no drain after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized, prospective clinical trial
    McCormack, Robert G.
    Greenhow, Robert J.
    Fogagnolo, Fabricio
    Shrier, Ian
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2006, 22 (08): : 889 - 893
  • [38] Intra-articular Drain versus No Drain after Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial
    Fedorowicz, Zbys
    BAHRAIN MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2008, 30 (02)
  • [39] The impact of surgical timing on postoperative motion and stability following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Hunter, RE
    Mastrangelo, J
    Freeman, JR
    Purnell, ML
    Jones, RH
    ARTHROSCOPY, 1996, 12 (06): : 667 - 674
  • [40] Adductor Canal Nerve Versus Femoral Nerve Blockade for Pain Control and Quadriceps Function Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Patellar Tendon Autograft: A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Bailey, Lane
    Griffin, Joshua
    Elliott, Mark
    Wu, Jennifer
    Papavasiliou, Thanos
    Harner, Christopher
    Lowe, Walter
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2019, 35 (03): : 921 - 929