Postoperative range of motion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autograft hamstrings - A prospective, randomized clinical trial of early versus delayed reconstructions

被引:95
|
作者
Bottoni, Craig R. [1 ]
Liddell, Travis R. [2 ]
Trainor, Timothy J. [2 ]
Freccero, David M. [2 ]
Lindell, Kenneth K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Qatar Orthopaed & Sports Med Ctr, Doha, Qatar
[2] Tripler Army Med Ctr, Honolulu, HI 96859 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2008年 / 36卷 / 04期
关键词
ACL; timing; hamstring; acute;
D O I
10.1177/0363546507312164
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is a common belief that surgical reconstruction of an acutely torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) should be delayed for at least 3 weeks because of the increased incidence of postoperative motion loss (arthrofibrosis) and suboptimal clinical results. Hypothesis: There is no difference in postoperative range of motion or stability after ACL reconstructions performed either acutely or delayed. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Patients with an acute ACL tear were prospectively randomized to either early ( within 21days) or delayed ( beyond 6 weeks) reconstruction using autograft hamstring tendon. Previous knee surgery on the index extremity and a multiligamentous injury were exclusionary criteria. Surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation were identical for all patients. Postoperative assessments included range of motion and KT-1000 arthrometer measurements compared with the contralateral knee. Standardized outcome measures were used including single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE), Lysholm, and Tegner Activity Score. Results: Seventy consecutive patients were enrolled, and 1 patient was dropped after a postoperative infection. Sixty-nine patients ( 34 acute, 35 delayed) with an average age of 27 years composed the study cohort. The mean time from injury to surgery was 9 days ( range, 2-17 days) for patients in the early group and 85 days (range, 42-192) for those in the delayed group. The average follow-up from surgery was 366 days ( range, 185-869). Articular cartilage and meniscal injuries were comparable between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences between the 2 treatment groups in degrees of extension or flexion lost relative to the nonoperative side, operative time, KT-1000 arthrometer differences, or subjective knee evaluations. Conclusion: Excellent clinical results can be achieved after ACL reconstructions performed soon after injury using autograft hamstrings. Although the authors do not advocate that all reconstructions should be performed acutely, they found that early ACL reconstructions do not result in loss of motion or suboptimal clinical results as long as a rehabilitation protocol emphasizing extension and early range of motion is employed.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 662
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Use of tourniquet in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Is it truly necessary? A prospective randomized clinical trial
    D'Ambrosi, Riccardo
    Valli, Federico
    Di Feo, Fabrizio
    Marchetti, Pietro
    Ursino, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2024, 32 (03)
  • [22] Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Autograft versus Planned Hybrid Graft
    Kraeutler, Matthew J.
    Kim, Seong H.
    Brown, Colin C.
    Houck, Darby A.
    Domby, Brian C.
    Reynolds, Kirk A.
    McCarty, Eric C.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (09) : 827 - 833
  • [23] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autologous Hamstrings Augmented With the Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System Versus Hamstrings Alone: A Comparative Cohort Study
    Aujla, Randeep S.
    Ebert, Jay R.
    Annear, Peter T.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (10)
  • [25] A Prospective Randomized Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autograft, γ-Irradiated Allograft, and Hybrid Graft
    Li, Jia
    Wang, Jianzhao
    Li, Yongqian
    Shao, Decheng
    You, Xiaona
    Shen, Yong
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (07): : 1296 - 1302
  • [26] Patient satisfaction with inpatient versus outpatient reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a randomized clinical trial
    Krywulak, SA
    Mohtadi, NGH
    Russell, ML
    Sasyniuk, TM
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 48 (03) : 201 - 206
  • [27] A prospective evaluation of tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings: extracortical versus anatomical fixation
    Buelow, JU
    Siebold, R
    Ellermann, A
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2002, 10 (02) : 80 - 85
  • [28] A prospective evaluation of tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings: extracortical versus anatomical fixation
    J.-U. Buelow
    R. Siebold
    A. Ellermann
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2002, 10 : 80 - 85
  • [29] Early Versus Delayed Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament A Decision Analysis Approach
    Bernstein, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 93A (09): : 894 - 894
  • [30] Early Brace Progression Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Leads to Improved Knee Range of Motion
    Erickson, Lauren N.
    Lucas, Kathryn C.
    Jacobs, Cale A.
    Johnson, Darren L.
    Ireland, Mary L.
    Noehren, Brian
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2019, 51 (06): : 872 - 873