Postoperative range of motion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autograft hamstrings - A prospective, randomized clinical trial of early versus delayed reconstructions

被引:95
|
作者
Bottoni, Craig R. [1 ]
Liddell, Travis R. [2 ]
Trainor, Timothy J. [2 ]
Freccero, David M. [2 ]
Lindell, Kenneth K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Qatar Orthopaed & Sports Med Ctr, Doha, Qatar
[2] Tripler Army Med Ctr, Honolulu, HI 96859 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2008年 / 36卷 / 04期
关键词
ACL; timing; hamstring; acute;
D O I
10.1177/0363546507312164
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is a common belief that surgical reconstruction of an acutely torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) should be delayed for at least 3 weeks because of the increased incidence of postoperative motion loss (arthrofibrosis) and suboptimal clinical results. Hypothesis: There is no difference in postoperative range of motion or stability after ACL reconstructions performed either acutely or delayed. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Patients with an acute ACL tear were prospectively randomized to either early ( within 21days) or delayed ( beyond 6 weeks) reconstruction using autograft hamstring tendon. Previous knee surgery on the index extremity and a multiligamentous injury were exclusionary criteria. Surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation were identical for all patients. Postoperative assessments included range of motion and KT-1000 arthrometer measurements compared with the contralateral knee. Standardized outcome measures were used including single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE), Lysholm, and Tegner Activity Score. Results: Seventy consecutive patients were enrolled, and 1 patient was dropped after a postoperative infection. Sixty-nine patients ( 34 acute, 35 delayed) with an average age of 27 years composed the study cohort. The mean time from injury to surgery was 9 days ( range, 2-17 days) for patients in the early group and 85 days (range, 42-192) for those in the delayed group. The average follow-up from surgery was 366 days ( range, 185-869). Articular cartilage and meniscal injuries were comparable between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences between the 2 treatment groups in degrees of extension or flexion lost relative to the nonoperative side, operative time, KT-1000 arthrometer differences, or subjective knee evaluations. Conclusion: Excellent clinical results can be achieved after ACL reconstructions performed soon after injury using autograft hamstrings. Although the authors do not advocate that all reconstructions should be performed acutely, they found that early ACL reconstructions do not result in loss of motion or suboptimal clinical results as long as a rehabilitation protocol emphasizing extension and early range of motion is employed.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 662
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Postoperative range of motion and stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring autograft
    Khan, Rana Dawood Ahmad
    Hassan, Syed Muhammad Tayyab
    Bin Saeed, Usama
    Yasin, Ajmal
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 65 (11) : S215 - S219
  • [2] A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Quadriceps Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Ebert, Jay R.
    Calvert, Nicholas D.
    Radic, Ross
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (03): : 660 - 669
  • [3] A prospective evaluation of clinical and functional outcome of single bundle anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings autograft
    Shaikh, Saeed Ahmed
    Ahmed, Naveed
    Adil, Salman
    Jamali, Allah Rakhio
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 70 (12) : 2476 - 2480
  • [4] Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Is Not Inferior to Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 2 Years: Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
    Murray, Martha M.
    Fleming, Braden C.
    Badger, Gary J.
    Kramer, Dennis E.
    Micheli, Lyle J.
    Yen, Yi-Meng
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (06): : 1305 - 1315
  • [5] Clinical outcomes of allograft versus autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Baer, Geoffrey S.
    Harner, Christopher D.
    CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (04) : 661 - +
  • [6] Prospective and Randomized Clinical Evaluation of Hamstring Versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Soccer Players
    Betoni Guglielmetti, Luiz Gabriel
    Roman Salas, Victor Eduardo
    Jorge, Pedro Baches
    Severino, Fabricio Roberto
    Duarte, Aires
    de Oliveira, Victor Marques
    Leite Cury, Ricardo de Paula
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (09)
  • [7] Range of motion and complications following primary repair versus reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament
    van der List, Jelle P.
    DiFelice, Gregory S.
    KNEE, 2017, 24 (04): : 798 - 807
  • [8] Decreased range of motion following acute versus chronic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Sterett, WI
    Hutton, KS
    Briggs, KK
    Steadman, JR
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2003, 26 (02) : 151 - 154
  • [9] Quick Recovery and No Arthrofibrosis in Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Prospective Trial of Early versus Delayed Reconstructiony
    Monaco, E.
    Iannotti, F.
    Carrozzo, A.
    Annibaldi, A.
    Marzilli, F.
    Nurzia, M.
    IndellI, P. F.
    Ferretti, A.
    MLTJ-MUSCLES LIGAMENTS AND TENDONS JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (02): : 324 - 332
  • [10] Morbidity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft
    Soon, M
    Chang, P
    Neo, CPC
    Mitra, AK
    Tay, BK
    ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2004, 33 (02) : 214 - 219