Integrating ecosystem services into sustainable landscape management: A collaborative approach

被引:21
|
作者
Terencio, D. P. S. [1 ,2 ]
Varandas, S. G. P. [1 ]
Fonseca, A. R. [1 ]
Cortes, R. M. V. [1 ]
Fernandes, L. F. [1 ]
Pacheco, F. A. L. [2 ]
Monteiro, S. M. [1 ]
Martinho, J. [3 ]
Cabral, J. [1 ]
Santos, J. [1 ]
Cabecinha, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tras Os Montes & Alto Douro, Inov4Agro CITAB, Ap 1013, P-5001801 Vila Real, Portugal
[2] Univ Tras Os Montes & Alto Douro, Ctr Quim Vila Real, Ap 1013, P-5001801 Vila Real, Portugal
[3] Univ Coimbra, Geosci Ctr, P-3030790 Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
Nature based solutions; Spatial multicriteria decision analysis; Biodiversity conservation; Ecosystem services; Participatory approach; Blue and Green Infrastructures (BGINs); VALUES; CONNECTIVITY; CATCHMENTS; WETLANDS; BLUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148538
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Paiva River is considered one of the least polluted rivers in Europe and its watershed has a high conservation value. However, the Paiva River basin suffers pressures related with recurrent disturbances in land use, such as forest fires, agricultural activities, urbanization and pressures that affect the natural hydromorphological conditions and the continuity of watercourses. Blue and Green Infrastructures (BGINs) emerge to improve biodiversity, sustainability and the supply of ecosystem services while improving socioeconomic aspects. Thus, this article aims to identify priority areas in the basin, for intervention with these infrastructures. For that, a spatial multicriteria decision analysis (MDCA) was carried out according to several data related to the Paiva River Basin. As local politicians and responsible entities for the natural resources management are the main experts on the problems and their possible solutions at the local level, they were involved in this decision-making model. Therefore, these specialized stakeholders did the weighting assignment according to the most or least importance of the same for the work. The map of priority locations to implement BGINs was obtained in the sequel. To the top 5 priority areas, stakeholders attributed the best solutions based on nature. The most recommended BGINs were recovery/maintenance of riparian vegetation and conservation and reforestation of the native forest, both presented in four of the five areas, and introduction of fuel management strips presented in three of the five areas. Thus, we concluded that it is extremely important to include the communities and the competent entities of nature and environment management in scientific projects related to conservation, forming a synergy that makes it possible to combine scientific knowledge with local experience acquired in the field. This project uses a very flexible methodology of local data and can be a great example to be implemented in other hydrographic basins anywhere in the world. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of the ecosystem services concept in landscape management in the Netherlands
    van Wensem, Joke
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 9 (02) : 237 - 242
  • [32] Landscape-scale management for biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Petit, Sandrine
    Landis, Douglas A.
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 347
  • [33] Ecosystem services management: an integrated approach
    Wang, Shuai
    Fu, Bojie
    Wei, Yongping
    Lyle, Clive
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [34] Evaluating landscape capacity to provide spatially explicit valued ecosystem services for sustainable coastal resource management
    Sannigrahi, Srikanta
    Joshi, Pawan Kumar
    Keesstra, Saskia
    Paul, Saikat Kumar
    Sen, Somnath
    Roy, P. S.
    Chakraborti, Suman
    Bhatt, Sandeep
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 182
  • [35] Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Landscapes: A Spatially Explicit Approach to Support Sustainable Soil Management
    Forouzangohar, Mohsen
    Crossman, Neville D.
    MacEwan, Richard J.
    Wallace, D. Dugal
    Bennett, Lauren T.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2014,
  • [36] Integrating landscape connectivity into the evaluation of ecosystem services for biodiversity conservation and its implications for landscape planning
    Ng, Cho Nam
    Xie, Yu Jing
    Yu, Xi Jun
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 42 : 1 - 12
  • [37] Soil management in relation to sustainable agriculture and ecosystem services
    Powlson, D. S.
    Gregory, P. J.
    Whalley, W. R.
    Quinton, J. N.
    Hopkins, D. W.
    Whitmore, A. P.
    Hirsch, P. R.
    Goulding, K. W. T.
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2011, 36 : S72 - S87
  • [38] Quantifying marginal utilities of ecosystem services for sustainable management
    Bai, Yang
    Ali, Maroof
    Zhou, Yi
    Yang, Shiliang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 470
  • [39] Sustainable grazing land management to protect ecosystem services
    Elvira Díaz-Pereira
    Asunción Romero-Díaz
    Joris de Vente
    [J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2020, 25 : 1461 - 1479
  • [40] Assessing and valuing peatland ecosystem services for sustainable management
    Reed, M. S.
    Bonn, A.
    Evans, C.
    Glenk, K.
    Hansjuergens, B.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 9 : 1 - 4