Integrating ecosystem services into sustainable landscape management: A collaborative approach

被引:21
|
作者
Terencio, D. P. S. [1 ,2 ]
Varandas, S. G. P. [1 ]
Fonseca, A. R. [1 ]
Cortes, R. M. V. [1 ]
Fernandes, L. F. [1 ]
Pacheco, F. A. L. [2 ]
Monteiro, S. M. [1 ]
Martinho, J. [3 ]
Cabral, J. [1 ]
Santos, J. [1 ]
Cabecinha, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tras Os Montes & Alto Douro, Inov4Agro CITAB, Ap 1013, P-5001801 Vila Real, Portugal
[2] Univ Tras Os Montes & Alto Douro, Ctr Quim Vila Real, Ap 1013, P-5001801 Vila Real, Portugal
[3] Univ Coimbra, Geosci Ctr, P-3030790 Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
Nature based solutions; Spatial multicriteria decision analysis; Biodiversity conservation; Ecosystem services; Participatory approach; Blue and Green Infrastructures (BGINs); VALUES; CONNECTIVITY; CATCHMENTS; WETLANDS; BLUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148538
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Paiva River is considered one of the least polluted rivers in Europe and its watershed has a high conservation value. However, the Paiva River basin suffers pressures related with recurrent disturbances in land use, such as forest fires, agricultural activities, urbanization and pressures that affect the natural hydromorphological conditions and the continuity of watercourses. Blue and Green Infrastructures (BGINs) emerge to improve biodiversity, sustainability and the supply of ecosystem services while improving socioeconomic aspects. Thus, this article aims to identify priority areas in the basin, for intervention with these infrastructures. For that, a spatial multicriteria decision analysis (MDCA) was carried out according to several data related to the Paiva River Basin. As local politicians and responsible entities for the natural resources management are the main experts on the problems and their possible solutions at the local level, they were involved in this decision-making model. Therefore, these specialized stakeholders did the weighting assignment according to the most or least importance of the same for the work. The map of priority locations to implement BGINs was obtained in the sequel. To the top 5 priority areas, stakeholders attributed the best solutions based on nature. The most recommended BGINs were recovery/maintenance of riparian vegetation and conservation and reforestation of the native forest, both presented in four of the five areas, and introduction of fuel management strips presented in three of the five areas. Thus, we concluded that it is extremely important to include the communities and the competent entities of nature and environment management in scientific projects related to conservation, forming a synergy that makes it possible to combine scientific knowledge with local experience acquired in the field. This project uses a very flexible methodology of local data and can be a great example to be implemented in other hydrographic basins anywhere in the world. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Integrating landscape ecological risk with ecosystem services in the Republic of Tatarstan, Russia
    Boori, M. S.
    Choudhary, K.
    Kupriyanov, A.
    [J]. COMPUTER OPTICS, 2024, 48 (02) : 282 - 293
  • [22] Integrating landscape ecology and the assessment of ecosystem services in the study of karst areas
    Canedoli, Claudia
    Ficetola, Gentile Francesco
    Corengia, Davide
    Tognini, Paola
    Ferrario, Andrea
    Padoa-Schioppa, Emilio
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2022, 37 (01) : 347 - 365
  • [23] Integrating stakeholders’ demands and scientific knowledge on ecosystem services in landscape planning
    Igone Palacios-Agundez
    Beatriz Fernández de Manuel
    Gloria Rodríguez-Loinaz
    Lorena Peña
    Ibone Ametzaga-Arregi
    Josu G. Alday
    Izaskun Casado-Arzuaga
    Iosu Madariaga
    Xabier Arana
    Miren Onaindia
    [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2014, 29 : 1423 - 1433
  • [24] Integrating forest ecosystem services into the farming landscape: A stochastic economic assessment
    Monge, Juan J.
    Parker, Warren J.
    Richardson, James W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 174 : 87 - 99
  • [25] Integrating stakeholders' demands and scientific knowledge on ecosystem services in landscape planning
    Palacios-Agundez, Igone
    Fernandez de Manuel, Beatriz
    Rodriguez-Loinaz, Gloria
    Pena, Lorena
    Ametzaga-Arregi, Ibone
    Alday, Josu G.
    Casado-Arzuaga, Izaskun
    Madariaga, Iosu
    Arana, Xabier
    Onaindia, Miren
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2014, 29 (08) : 1423 - 1433
  • [26] Framing ecosystem services: Affecting behaviour of actors in collaborative landscape planning?
    Opdam, Paul
    Coninx, Ingrid
    Dewulf, Art
    Steingrover, Eveliene
    Vos, Claire
    van der Wal, Merel
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 46 : 223 - 231
  • [27] Integrating ecosystem services value for sustainable land-use management in semi-arid region
    Rao, Yingxue
    Zhou, Min
    Ou, Guoliang
    Dai, Deyi
    Zhang, Lu
    Zhang, Zuo
    Nie, Xin
    Yang, Chun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 186 : 662 - 672
  • [28] Use of the ecosystem services concept in landscape management in the Netherlands
    van Wensem, Joke
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 9 (02) : 237 - 242
  • [29] Ecosystem Services for Scenic Quality Landscape Management: A Review
    Smardon, Richard
    [J]. LAND, 2021, 10 (11)
  • [30] Landscape management and economic evaluation of the ecosystem services of the vineyards
    Sgroi, Filippo
    [J]. AIMS ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 8 (04) : 393 - 402