Integrating ecosystem services into sustainable landscape management: A collaborative approach

被引:21
|
作者
Terencio, D. P. S. [1 ,2 ]
Varandas, S. G. P. [1 ]
Fonseca, A. R. [1 ]
Cortes, R. M. V. [1 ]
Fernandes, L. F. [1 ]
Pacheco, F. A. L. [2 ]
Monteiro, S. M. [1 ]
Martinho, J. [3 ]
Cabral, J. [1 ]
Santos, J. [1 ]
Cabecinha, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tras Os Montes & Alto Douro, Inov4Agro CITAB, Ap 1013, P-5001801 Vila Real, Portugal
[2] Univ Tras Os Montes & Alto Douro, Ctr Quim Vila Real, Ap 1013, P-5001801 Vila Real, Portugal
[3] Univ Coimbra, Geosci Ctr, P-3030790 Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
Nature based solutions; Spatial multicriteria decision analysis; Biodiversity conservation; Ecosystem services; Participatory approach; Blue and Green Infrastructures (BGINs); VALUES; CONNECTIVITY; CATCHMENTS; WETLANDS; BLUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148538
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Paiva River is considered one of the least polluted rivers in Europe and its watershed has a high conservation value. However, the Paiva River basin suffers pressures related with recurrent disturbances in land use, such as forest fires, agricultural activities, urbanization and pressures that affect the natural hydromorphological conditions and the continuity of watercourses. Blue and Green Infrastructures (BGINs) emerge to improve biodiversity, sustainability and the supply of ecosystem services while improving socioeconomic aspects. Thus, this article aims to identify priority areas in the basin, for intervention with these infrastructures. For that, a spatial multicriteria decision analysis (MDCA) was carried out according to several data related to the Paiva River Basin. As local politicians and responsible entities for the natural resources management are the main experts on the problems and their possible solutions at the local level, they were involved in this decision-making model. Therefore, these specialized stakeholders did the weighting assignment according to the most or least importance of the same for the work. The map of priority locations to implement BGINs was obtained in the sequel. To the top 5 priority areas, stakeholders attributed the best solutions based on nature. The most recommended BGINs were recovery/maintenance of riparian vegetation and conservation and reforestation of the native forest, both presented in four of the five areas, and introduction of fuel management strips presented in three of the five areas. Thus, we concluded that it is extremely important to include the communities and the competent entities of nature and environment management in scientific projects related to conservation, forming a synergy that makes it possible to combine scientific knowledge with local experience acquired in the field. This project uses a very flexible methodology of local data and can be a great example to be implemented in other hydrographic basins anywhere in the world. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating Landscape Pattern into Characterising and Optimising Ecosystem Services for Regional Sustainable Development
    Li, Yangbiao
    Zeng, Chen
    Liu, Zhixin
    Cai, Bingqian
    Zhang, Yang
    [J]. LAND, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [2] Measurement, Collaborative Learning and Research for Sustainable Use of Ecosystem Services: Landscape Concepts and Europe as Laboratory
    Per Angelstam
    Michael Grodzynskyi
    Kjell Andersson
    Robert Axelsson
    Marine Elbakidze
    Alexander Khoroshev
    Ivan Kruhlov
    Vladimir Naumov
    [J]. AMBIO, 2013, 42 : 129 - 145
  • [3] Measurement, Collaborative Learning and Research for Sustainable Use of Ecosystem Services: Landscape Concepts and Europe as Laboratory
    Angelstam, Per
    Grodzynskyi, Michael
    Andersson, Kjell
    Axelsson, Robert
    Elbakidze, Marine
    Khoroshev, Alexander
    Kruhlov, Ivan
    Naumov, Vladimir
    [J]. AMBIO, 2013, 42 (02) : 129 - 145
  • [4] Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making
    de Groot, R. S.
    Alkemade, R.
    Braat, L.
    Hein, L.
    Willemen, L.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2010, 7 (03) : 260 - 272
  • [5] Sustainable Watersheds: Integrating Ecosystem Services and Public Health
    Jordan, Stephen J.
    Benson, William H.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH INSIGHTS, 2015, 9
  • [6] Ecosystem services in sustainable groundwater management
    Tuinstra, Jaap
    van Wensem, Joke
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 485 : 798 - 803
  • [7] Integrating wildfire resistance and environmental concerns into a sustainable forest ecosystem management approach
    Ferreira, Liliana
    Baptista, Alexandra Nascimento
    Constantino, Miguel
    Marques, Susete
    Martins, Isabel
    Borges, Jose G.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE, 2023, 6
  • [8] Integrating Ecosystem Services Into Water Resource Management: An Indicator-Based Approach
    Shaad, Kashif
    Souter, Nicholas J.
    Vollmer, Derek
    Regan, Helen M.
    Bezerra, Maira Ometto
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (04) : 752 - 767
  • [9] Integrating Ecosystem Services Into Water Resource Management: An Indicator-Based Approach
    Kashif Shaad
    Nicholas J. Souter
    Derek Vollmer
    Helen M. Regan
    Maíra Ometto Bezerra
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2022, 69 : 752 - 767
  • [10] Services Personalization Approach for a Collaborative Care Ecosystem
    Baldissera, Thais Andrea
    Camarinha-Matos, Luis M.
    [J]. COLLABORATION IN A HYPERCONNECTED WORLD, 2016, 480 : 443 - 456