A Review of Quality Metrics for Fused Image

被引:251
|
作者
Jagalingam, P. [1 ]
Hegde, Arkal Vittal [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Appl Mech & Hydraul, Surathkal 575025, Karnataka, India
关键词
Remote Sensing; Image Fusion; Quantitative; Qualitative; ARSIS CONCEPT; FUSION; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.019
中图分类号
P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Image fusion is the process of combining high spatial resolution panchromatic (PAN) image and rich multispectral (MS) image into a single image. The fused single image obtained is known to be spatially and spectrally enhanced compared to the raw input images. In recent years, many image fusion techniques such as principal component analysis, intensity hue saturation, brovey transforms and multi-scale transforms, etc., have been proposed to fuse the PAN and MS images effectively. However, it is important to assess the quality of the fused image before using it for various applications of remote sensing. In order to evaluate the quality of the fused image, many researchers have proposed different quality metrics in terms of both qualitative and quantitative analyses. Qualitative analysis determines the performance of the fused image by visual comparison between the fused image and raw input images. On the other hand, quantitative analysis determines the performance of the fused image by two variants such as with reference image and without reference image. When the reference image is available, the performance of fused image is evaluated using the metrics such as root mean square error, mean bias, mutual information, etc. When the reference image is not available the performance of fused image is evaluated using the metrics such as standard deviation, entropy, etc. The paper reviews the various quality metrics available in the literature, for assessing the quality of fused image. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 142
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis and Evaluation of Image Quality Metrics
    Samajdar, Tina
    Quraishi, Md Iqbal
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN AND INTELLIGENT APPLICATIONS, VOL 2, 2015, 340 : 369 - 378
  • [22] Stereoscopic image quality metrics and compression
    Corley, Paul
    Holliman, Nick
    [J]. STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAYS AND APPLICATIONS XIX, 2008, 6803
  • [23] Steganalysis based on image quality metrics
    Avcibas, I
    Memon, N
    Sankur, B
    [J]. 2001 IEEE FOURTH WORKSHOP ON MULTIMEDIA SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2001, : 517 - 522
  • [24] Edge quality metrics for image enhancement
    Nasonov A.V.
    Krylov A.S.
    [J]. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, 2012, 22 (2) : 346 - 353
  • [25] Image quality metrics for printers/plotters
    Kipman, Y
    [J]. FOURTH COLOR IMAGING CONFERENCE: COLOR SCIENCE, SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS: FINAL PROGRAM AND PROCEEDINGS OF IS&T/SID, 1996, : 134 - 138
  • [26] IMAGE FUSION AND IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF FUSED IMAGES
    Han, Zhen
    Tang, Xinming
    Gao, Xiaoming
    Hu, Fen
    [J]. 3RD ISPRS IWIDF 2013, 2013, 40-7-W1 : 33 - 36
  • [27] Color Image Database for Evaluation of Image Quality Metrics
    Ponomarenko, N.
    Lukin, V.
    Egiazarian, K.
    Astola, J.
    Carli, M.
    Battisti, F.
    [J]. 2008 IEEE 10TH WORKSHOP ON MULTIMEDIA SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 407 - +
  • [28] A review of quality metrics in colonoscopy
    Chuquin, Kathryn
    Sylla, Patricia
    [J]. ANNALS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2019, 4
  • [29] Estimating Print Quality Attributes by Image Quality Metrics
    Pedersen, Marius
    Bonnier, Nicolas
    Hardeberg, Jon Y.
    Albregtsen, Fritz
    [J]. COLOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, TECHNOLOGIES, AND APPLICATIONS: EIGHTEENTH COLOR AND IMAGING CONFERENCE, 2010, : 68 - 73
  • [30] Are existing procedures enough? Image and video quality assessment: Review of subjective and objective metrics
    Ouni, S.
    Chambah, M.
    Herbin, M.
    Zagrouba, E.
    [J]. IMAGE QUALITY AND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE V, 2008, 6808