Analysis and Evaluation of Image Quality Metrics

被引:31
|
作者
Samajdar, Tina [1 ]
Quraishi, Md Iqbal [2 ]
机构
[1] Kalyani Govt Engn Coll, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Nadia, W Bengal, India
[2] Kalyani Govt Engn Coll, Dept Informat Technol, Nadia, W Bengal, India
关键词
IQA; HVS; MSE; PSNR; UQI; SSIM; FSIM; FSIMc; GSM; NQM; ASSESSMENT ALGORITHMS; SIMILARITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/978-81-322-2247-7_38
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Image Quality Assessment (IQA) is a very difficult task, yet highly important characteristic for evaluation of the image quality. Widely popular IQA techniques, belonging to objective fidelity, like Mean Square Error (MSE), Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) or subjective fidelity which corresponds to the human visual system (HVS), like, Universal Quality Index (UQI), Structural SIMilarity (SSIM), Feature SIMilarity (FSIM), Feature SIMilarity for color images (FSIMc), Gradient Magnitude Similarity (GSM) have been discussed in this paper. Also quality measured on basis of degradation model and Noise Quality Measure (NQM) has been discussed. Experiments have been conducted on IVC database available online at http://www.irccyn.ec-nantes.fr/ivcdb/ and verified from the CSIQ database and LAR database available online at http://vision.okstate.edu/?loc=csiq and http://www.irccyn.ec-nantes.fr/similar to autrusse/Databases/LAR/. On the basis of the obtained values judgements about the image distortion and hence the optimum image quality metric has been decided. It has been found from all the experiments conducted that FSIM is the best metric for the JPEG, JPEG2000, blur and LAR whereas UQI failed to give better results for all except JPEG2000.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 378
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AN EVALUATION OF IMAGE QUALITY METRICS
    JACOBSON, RE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAPHIC SCIENCE, 1995, 43 (01): : 7 - 16
  • [2] Image quality metrics for the evaluation of print quality
    Pedersen, Marius
    Bonnier, Nicolas
    Hardeberg, Jon Y.
    Albregtsen, Fritz
    [J]. IMAGE QUALITY AND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE VIII, 2011, 7867
  • [3] Color Image Database for Evaluation of Image Quality Metrics
    Ponomarenko, N.
    Lukin, V.
    Egiazarian, K.
    Astola, J.
    Carli, M.
    Battisti, F.
    [J]. 2008 IEEE 10TH WORKSHOP ON MULTIMEDIA SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 407 - +
  • [4] Comparison of Metrics for Colorized Image Quality Evaluation
    Zeger, Ivana
    Bilanovic, Nikolina
    Sisul, Gordan
    Grgic, Sonja
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2022 64TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ELMAR-2022, 2022, : 209 - 214
  • [5] IMAGE QUALITY EVALUATION METRICS BASED ON HWD
    Lu Wen
    Gao Xin-Bo
    Zeng Kai
    He Li-Huo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFRARED AND MILLIMETER WAVES, 2009, 28 (01) : 72 - 76
  • [6] Evaluation of Image Quality Metrics for Color Prints
    Pedersen, Marius
    Zheng, Yuanlin
    Hardeberg, Jon Yngve
    [J]. IMAGE ANALYSIS: 17TH SCANDINAVIAN CONFERENCE, SCIA 2011, 2011, 6688 : 317 - 326
  • [7] Evaluation of Image Quality Metrics for Sharpness Enhancement
    Cheng, Yao
    Pedersen, Marius
    Chen, Guangxue
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS, 2017, : 115 - 120
  • [8] STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF VISUAL QUALITY METRICS FOR IMAGE DENOISING
    Egiazarian, Karen
    Ponomarenko, Mykola
    Lukin, Vladimir
    Ieremeiev, Oleg
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2018, : 6752 - 6756
  • [9] Perceptual scaling of quality metrics for hardcopy image evaluation
    Brill, MH
    Lubin, J
    Wolin, D
    [J]. IS&T'S NIP15: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL PRINTING TECHNOLOGIES, 1999, : 435 - 438
  • [10] IMAGE QUALITY METRICS
    JACOBSON, RE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAPHIC SCIENCE, 1995, 43 (02): : 42 - 43