A Review of Quality Metrics for Fused Image

被引:251
|
作者
Jagalingam, P. [1 ]
Hegde, Arkal Vittal [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Appl Mech & Hydraul, Surathkal 575025, Karnataka, India
关键词
Remote Sensing; Image Fusion; Quantitative; Qualitative; ARSIS CONCEPT; FUSION; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.019
中图分类号
P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Image fusion is the process of combining high spatial resolution panchromatic (PAN) image and rich multispectral (MS) image into a single image. The fused single image obtained is known to be spatially and spectrally enhanced compared to the raw input images. In recent years, many image fusion techniques such as principal component analysis, intensity hue saturation, brovey transforms and multi-scale transforms, etc., have been proposed to fuse the PAN and MS images effectively. However, it is important to assess the quality of the fused image before using it for various applications of remote sensing. In order to evaluate the quality of the fused image, many researchers have proposed different quality metrics in terms of both qualitative and quantitative analyses. Qualitative analysis determines the performance of the fused image by visual comparison between the fused image and raw input images. On the other hand, quantitative analysis determines the performance of the fused image by two variants such as with reference image and without reference image. When the reference image is available, the performance of fused image is evaluated using the metrics such as root mean square error, mean bias, mutual information, etc. When the reference image is not available the performance of fused image is evaluated using the metrics such as standard deviation, entropy, etc. The paper reviews the various quality metrics available in the literature, for assessing the quality of fused image. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 142
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perceived assessment metrics for visible and infrared color fused image quality without reference image
    Xuelian Yu
    Qian Chen
    Guohua Gu
    Jianle Ren
    Xiubao Sui
    [J]. Optical Review, 2015, 22 : 109 - 122
  • [2] Perceived assessment metrics for visible and infrared color fused image quality without reference image
    Yu, Xuelian
    Chen, Qian
    Gu, Guohua
    Ren, Jianle
    Sui, Xiubao
    [J]. OPTICAL REVIEW, 2015, 22 (01) : 109 - 122
  • [3] Metrics for measuring the quality of fused images
    Maruthi, R.
    Suresh, R. M.
    [J]. ICCIMA 2007: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND MULTIMEDIA APPLICATIONS, VOL III, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 153 - +
  • [4] IMAGE QUALITY METRICS
    JACOBSON, RE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAPHIC SCIENCE, 1995, 43 (02): : 42 - 43
  • [5] Diffuse Prior Monotonic Likelihood Ratio Test for Evaluation of Fused Image Quality Metrics
    Wei, Chuanming
    Kaplan, Lance M.
    Burks, Stephen D.
    Blum, Rick S.
    [J]. FUSION: 2009 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION FUSION, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 1076 - +
  • [6] Image compression quality metrics
    Szu, H
    Hsu, C
    Landa, J
    Jones, T
    OKane, B
    OConnor, J
    Murenzi, R
    Smith, M
    [J]. WAVELET APPLICATIONS IV, 1997, 3078 : 42 - 55
  • [7] On Monotonicity of Image Quality Metrics
    Zhai, Guangtao
    Wu, Xiaolin
    [J]. 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2012, : 1157 - 1160
  • [8] AN EVALUATION OF IMAGE QUALITY METRICS
    JACOBSON, RE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAPHIC SCIENCE, 1995, 43 (01): : 7 - 16
  • [9] Image metrics for predicting subjective image quality
    Chen, L
    Singer, B
    Guirao, A
    Porter, J
    Williams, DR
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2005, 82 (05) : 358 - 369
  • [10] Image quality metrics for the evaluation of print quality
    Pedersen, Marius
    Bonnier, Nicolas
    Hardeberg, Jon Y.
    Albregtsen, Fritz
    [J]. IMAGE QUALITY AND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE VIII, 2011, 7867