Comparison of Regional and Global GRACE Gravity Field Models at High Latitudes

被引:2
|
作者
Gunter, B. C. [1 ]
Wittwer, T. [1 ]
Stolk, W. [1 ]
Klees, R. [1 ]
Ditmar, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Delft Inst Earth Observat & Space Syst DEOS, NL-2629 HS Delft, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1007/978-3-642-20338-1_21
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In this study we address the question of whether regional gravity field modeling techniques of GRACE data can offer improved resolution over traditional global spherical harmonic solutions. Earlier studies into large, equatorial river basins such as the Amazon, Zambezi and others showed no obvious distinction between regional and global techniques, but this may have been limited by the fact that these equatorial regions are at the latitudes where GRACE errors are known to be largest (due to the sparse groundtrack coverage). This study will focus on regions of higher latitude, specifically Greenland and Antarctica, where the density of GRACE measurements is much higher. The regional modeling technique employed made use of spherical radial basis functions (SRBF), complete with an optimal filtering algorithm. Comparisons of these regional solutions were made to a range of other publicly available global spherical harmonic solutions, and validated using ICESat laser altimetry. The timeframe considered was a 3 year period spanning from October 2003 to September 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 177
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] SENSITIVITY OF LAGEOS ORBITS TO GLOBAL GRAVITY FIELD MODELS
    Sosnica, K.
    Thaller, D.
    Jaeggi, A.
    Dach, R.
    Beutler, G.
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL SATELLITES-JOURNAL OF PLANETARY GEODESY, 2012, 47 (02): : 47 - 65
  • [32] REGIONAL MODELS OF THE ATMOSPHERE IN MIDDLE LATITUDES
    ANTHES, RA
    [J]. MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 1983, 111 (06) : 1306 - 1335
  • [33] Exploitation of Marine Gravity Measurements of the Mediterranean in the Validation of Global Gravity Field Models
    Lequentrec-Lalancette, M. F.
    Salaun, C.
    Bonvalot, S.
    Rouxel, D.
    Bruinsma, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, 2018, 147 : 63 - 67
  • [34] The comparison of global gravity models with terrestrial gravity data over western Anatolia
    Yilmaz, M.
    [J]. BOLLETTINO DI GEOFISICA TEORICA ED APPLICATA, 2019, 60 (03) : 475 - 488
  • [35] Assessment of Earth Gravity Field Models in the Medium to High Frequency Spectrum Based on GRACE and GOCE Dynamic Orbit Analysis
    Papanikolaou, Thomas D.
    Tsoulis, Dimitrios
    [J]. GEOSCIENCES, 2018, 8 (12)
  • [36] Regional Gravity Field Recovery from GRACE Using Position Optimized Radial Base Functions
    Weigelt, M.
    Antoni, M.
    Keller, W.
    [J]. GRAVITY, GEOID AND EARTH OBSERVATION, 2010, 135 : 139 - 146
  • [37] EMPIRICAL MODE DECOMPOSITION FOR POST-PROCESSING THE GRACE MONTHLY GRAVITY FIELD MODELS
    Huan, Changmin
    Wang, Fengwei
    Zhou, Shijian
    [J]. ACTA GEODYNAMICA ET GEOMATERIALIA, 2022, 19 (04): : 281 - 290
  • [38] Analysis of star camera errors in GRACE data and their impact on monthly gravity field models
    Pedro Inácio
    Pavel Ditmar
    Roland Klees
    Hassan Hashemi Farahani
    [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2015, 89 : 551 - 571
  • [39] Analysis of star camera errors in GRACE data and their impact on monthly gravity field models
    Inacio, Pedro
    Ditmar, Pavel
    Klees, Roland
    Farahani, Hassan Hashemi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2015, 89 (06) : 551 - 571
  • [40] A detailed analysis of stochastic models applied to temporal gravity field recovery with GRACE observations
    Yu, Biao
    You, Wei
    Kusche, Juergen
    Fan, Dongming
    Su, Yong
    Zhang, Jiahui
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 236 (01) : 516 - 536