Comparison of Regional and Global GRACE Gravity Field Models at High Latitudes

被引:2
|
作者
Gunter, B. C. [1 ]
Wittwer, T. [1 ]
Stolk, W. [1 ]
Klees, R. [1 ]
Ditmar, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Delft Inst Earth Observat & Space Syst DEOS, NL-2629 HS Delft, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1007/978-3-642-20338-1_21
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In this study we address the question of whether regional gravity field modeling techniques of GRACE data can offer improved resolution over traditional global spherical harmonic solutions. Earlier studies into large, equatorial river basins such as the Amazon, Zambezi and others showed no obvious distinction between regional and global techniques, but this may have been limited by the fact that these equatorial regions are at the latitudes where GRACE errors are known to be largest (due to the sparse groundtrack coverage). This study will focus on regions of higher latitude, specifically Greenland and Antarctica, where the density of GRACE measurements is much higher. The regional modeling technique employed made use of spherical radial basis functions (SRBF), complete with an optimal filtering algorithm. Comparisons of these regional solutions were made to a range of other publicly available global spherical harmonic solutions, and validated using ICESat laser altimetry. The timeframe considered was a 3 year period spanning from October 2003 to September 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 177
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparison of Global and Regional GRACE Models for Land Hydrology
    Klees, R.
    Liu, X.
    Wittwer, T.
    Gunter, B. C.
    Revtova, E. A.
    Tenzer, R.
    Ditmar, P.
    Winsemius, H. C.
    Savenije, H. H. G.
    [J]. SURVEYS IN GEOPHYSICS, 2008, 29 (4-5) : 335 - 359
  • [2] A Comparison of Global and Regional GRACE Models for Land Hydrology
    R. Klees
    X. Liu
    T. Wittwer
    B. C. Gunter
    E. A. Revtova
    R. Tenzer
    P. Ditmar
    H. C. Winsemius
    H. H. G. Savenije
    [J]. Surveys in Geophysics, 2008, 29 : 335 - 359
  • [3] A comparison of GRACE temporal gravity field models recovered with different processing details
    Yu, Biao
    You, Wei
    Fan, Dong-Ming
    Su, Yong
    Nigatu, Zemede M.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 227 (02) : 1392 - 1417
  • [4] Comparison of CHAMP and GRACE geopotential models with terrestrial gravity field data in Hungary
    Tóth Gy.
    Rózsa Sz.
    [J]. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica, 2006, 41 (2): : 171 - 180
  • [5] On regularized time varying gravity field models based on grace data and their comparison with hydrological models
    Mehdi Eshagh
    Jean-Michel Lemoine
    Pascal Gegout
    Richard Biancale
    [J]. Acta Geophysica, 2013, 61 : 1 - 17
  • [6] On regularized time varying gravity field models based on grace data and their comparison with hydrological models
    Eshagh, Mehdi
    Lemoine, Jean-Michel
    Gegout, Pascal
    Biancale, Richard
    [J]. ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2013, 61 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [7] A comparison of the gravity field over Central Europe from superconducting gravimeters, GRACE and global hydrological models, using EOF analysis
    Crossley, David
    de Linage, Caroline
    Hinderer, Jacques
    Boy, Jean-Paul
    Famiglietti, James
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 189 (02) : 877 - 897
  • [8] Improved Resolution of a GRACE Gravity Field Model by Regional Refinements
    Eicker, A.
    Mayer-Guerr, T.
    Ilk, K. H.
    [J]. OBSERVING OUR CHANGING EARTH, 2009, 133 : 99 - 104
  • [9] Expected accuracy of the global gravity field for next GRACE satellite gravity mission
    Ran Jiang-Jun
    Xu Hou-Ze
    Shen Yun-Zhong
    Zhong Min
    Zhang Xing-Fu
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2012, 55 (09): : 2898 - 2908
  • [10] Comparison of global geopotential models from the champ and grace missions for regional geoid modelling in Turkey
    Bihter Erol
    Michael G. Sideris
    Rahmi N. Çelik
    [J]. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 2009, 53 : 419 - 441