On regularized time varying gravity field models based on grace data and their comparison with hydrological models

被引:11
|
作者
Eshagh, Mehdi [1 ,2 ]
Lemoine, Jean-Michel [3 ]
Gegout, Pascal [3 ]
Biancale, Richard [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Inst Technol KTH, Div Geodesy & Geoinformat, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Dept Geodesy, Tehran, Iran
[3] French Space Agcy CNES, Dept Space Geodesy GRGS, Toulouse, France
关键词
gravity field and climate experiment; hydrological model; inversion; range-rate; smoothing; PARAMETERS; INVERSION; OCEAN;
D O I
10.2478/s11600-012-0053-5
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Determination of spherical harmonic coefficients of the Earth's gravity field is often an ill-posed problem and leads to solving an ill-conditioned system of equations. Inversion of such a system is critical, as small errors of data will yield large variations in the result. Regularization is a method to solve such an unstable system of equations. In this study, direct methods of Tikhonov, truncated and damped singular value decomposition and iterative methods of nu, algebraic reconstruction technique, range restricted generalized minimum residual and conjugate gradient are used to solve the normal equations constructed based on range rate data of the gravity field and climate experiment (GRACE) for specific periods. Numerical studies show that the Tikhonov regularization and damped singular value decomposition methods for which the regularization parameter is estimated using quasioptimal criterion deliver the smoothest solutions. Each regularized solution is compared to the global land data assimilation system (GLDAS) hydrological model. The Tikhonov regularization with L-curve delivers a solution with high correlation with this model and a relatively small standard deviation over oceans. Among iterative methods, conjugate gradient is the most suited one for the same reasons and it has the shortest computation time.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On regularized time varying gravity field models based on grace data and their comparison with hydrological models
    Mehdi Eshagh
    Jean-Michel Lemoine
    Pascal Gegout
    Richard Biancale
    [J]. Acta Geophysica, 2013, 61 : 1 - 17
  • [2] Seasonal gravity field variations from GRACE and hydrological models
    Andersen, OB
    Hinderer, J
    Lemoine, FG
    [J]. GRAVITY, GEOID AND SPACE MISSIONS, 2005, 129 : 316 - 321
  • [3] Comparison of CHAMP and GRACE geopotential models with terrestrial gravity field data in Hungary
    Tóth Gy.
    Rózsa Sz.
    [J]. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica, 2006, 41 (2): : 171 - 180
  • [4] Temporal gravity field models inferred from GRACE data
    Lemoine, Jean-Michel
    Bruinsma, Sean
    Loyer, Sylvain
    Biancale, Richard
    Marty, Jean-Charles
    Perosanz, Felix
    Balmino, Georges
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2007, 39 (10) : 1620 - 1629
  • [5] Comparison of Regional and Global GRACE Gravity Field Models at High Latitudes
    Gunter, B. C.
    Wittwer, T.
    Stolk, W.
    Klees, R.
    Ditmar, P.
    [J]. GEODESY FOR PLANET EARTH: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 IAG SYMPOSIUM, 2012, 136 : 171 - 177
  • [6] Improvement of Global Hydrological Models Using GRACE Data
    Guentner, Andreas
    [J]. SURVEYS IN GEOPHYSICS, 2008, 29 (4-5) : 375 - 397
  • [7] Improvement of Global Hydrological Models Using GRACE Data
    Andreas Güntner
    [J]. Surveys in Geophysics, 2008, 29 : 375 - 397
  • [8] A comparison of GRACE temporal gravity field models recovered with different processing details
    Yu, Biao
    You, Wei
    Fan, Dong-Ming
    Su, Yong
    Nigatu, Zemede M.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 227 (02) : 1392 - 1417
  • [9] A comparison of the gravity field over Central Europe from superconducting gravimeters, GRACE and global hydrological models, using EOF analysis
    Crossley, David
    de Linage, Caroline
    Hinderer, Jacques
    Boy, Jean-Paul
    Famiglietti, James
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 189 (02) : 877 - 897
  • [10] GRACE time-varying gravity field solutions based on PANDA software
    Xiang Guo
    Qile Zhao
    [J]. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2018, (02) : 162 - 168