Estimation of forest aboveground biomass and uncertainties by integration of field measurements, airborne LiDAR, and SAR and optical satellite data in Mexico

被引:98
|
作者
Urbazaev, Mikhail [1 ,2 ]
Thiel, Christian [1 ]
Cremer, Felix [1 ]
Dubayah, Ralph [3 ]
Migliavacca, Mirco [4 ]
Reichstein, Markus [4 ]
Schmullius, Christiane [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Schiller Univ Jena, Inst Geog, Dept Earth Observat, D-07743 Jena, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Biogeochem, IMPRS, D-07745 Jena, Germany
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[4] Max Planck Inst Biogeochem, Dept Biogeochem Integrat, D-07745 Jena, Germany
来源
关键词
GROWING STOCK VOLUME; TROPICAL FOREST; CARBON STOCKS; PALSAR DATA; BACKSCATTER; COVER; MAP; PERFORMANCE; IMAGERY; LASER;
D O I
10.1186/s13021-018-0093-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: Information on the spatial distribution of aboveground biomass (AGB) over large areas is needed for understanding and managing processes involved in the carbon cycle and supporting international policies for climate change mitigation and adaption. Furthermore, these products provide important baseline data for the development of sustainable management strategies to local stakeholders. The use of remote sensing data can provide spatially explicit information of AGB from local to global scales. In this study, we mapped national Mexican forest AGB using satellite remote sensing data and a machine learning approach. We modelled AGB using two scenarios: (1) extensive national forest inventory (NFI), and (2) airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) as reference data. Finally, we propagated uncertainties from field measurements to LiDAR-derived AGB and to the national wall-to-wall forest AGB map. Results: The estimated AGB maps (NFI- and LiDAR-calibrated) showed similar goodness-of-fit statistics (R-2 , Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)) at three different scales compared to the independent validation data set. We observed different spatial patterns of AGB in tropical dense forests, where no or limited number of NFI data were available, with higher AGB values in the LiDAR-calibrated map. We estimated much higher uncertainties in the AGB maps based on two-stage up-scaling method (i.e., from field measurements to LiDAR and from LiDAR-based estimates to satellite imagery) compared to the traditional field to satellite up-scaling. By removing LiDAR-based AGB pixels with high uncertainties, it was possible to estimate national forest AGB with similar uncertainties as calibrated with NFI data only. Conclusions: Since LiDAR data can be acquired much faster and for much larger areas compared to field inventory data, LiDAR is attractive for repetitive large scale AGB mapping. In this study, we showed that two-stage up-scaling methods for AGB estimation over large areas need to be analyzed and validated with great care. The uncertainties in the LiDAR-estimated AGB propagate further in the wall-to-wall map and can be up to 150%.Thus, when a two-stage up-scaling method is applied, it is crucial to characterize the uncertainties at all stages in order to generate robust results. Considering the findings mentioned above LiDAR can be used as an extension to NFI for example for areas that are difficult or not possible to access.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Estimation of Above-Ground Forest Biomass in Nepal by the Use of Airborne LiDAR, and Forest Inventory Data
    Bahadur, K. C. Yam
    Liu, Qijing
    Saud, Pradip
    Gaire, Damodar
    Adhikari, Hari
    [J]. LAND, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [42] Mapping the spatial distribution of Colombia's forest aboveground biomass using SAR and optical data
    Rodriguez-Veiga, P.
    Barbosa-Herrera, A. P.
    Barreto-Silva, J. S.
    Bispo, P. C.
    Cabrera, E.
    Capachero, C.
    Galindo, G.
    Gou, Y.
    Moreno, L. M.
    Louis, V.
    Lozano, P.
    Pacheco-Pascagaza, A. M.
    Pachon-Cendales, I. P.
    Phillips-Bernal, J. F.
    Roberts, J.
    Salinas, N. R.
    Vergara, L.
    Zuluaga, A. C.
    Balzter, H.
    [J]. ISPRS TECHNICAL COMMISSION III WG III/2, 10 JOINT WORKSHOP MULTIDISCIPLINARY REMOTE SENSING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2019, 42-3 (W7): : 57 - 60
  • [43] Estimation of forest stand diameter class using airborne lidar and field data
    Chang, Anjin
    Jung, Jinha
    Kim, Yongmin
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2015, 6 (06) : 419 - 428
  • [44] EXTRAPOLATION OF LIDAR FOR FOREST STRUCTURE ESTIMATION USING SAR, INSAR, AND OPTICAL DATA
    Benson, Michael L.
    Pierce, Leland E.
    Bergen, Kathleen M.
    Sarabandi, Kamal
    Zhang, Kailai
    Ryan, Caitlin E.
    [J]. 2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2010, : 1633 - 1636
  • [45] Aboveground Forest Biomass Estimation by the Integration of TLS and ALOS PALSAR Data Using Machine Learning
    Singh, Arunima
    Kushwaha, Sunni Kanta Prasad
    Nandy, Subrata
    Padalia, Hitendra
    Ghosh, Surajit
    Srivastava, Ankur
    Kumari, Nikul
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [46] Tropical forest canopy cover estimation using satellite imagery and airborne lidar reference data
    Korhonen, Lauri
    Ali-Sisto, Daniela
    Tokola, Timo
    [J]. SILVA FENNICA, 2015, 49 (05)
  • [47] Combined ERS SAR and optical satellite data for the estimation of forest structural attributes
    Kattenborn, G
    Nezry, E
    [J]. IGARSS '97 - 1997 INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS VOLS I-IV: REMOTE SENSING - A SCIENTIFIC VISION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 1997, : 1087 - 1089
  • [48] Random Forest Regression modelling for Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation using RISAT-1 PolSAR and Terrestrial LiDAR Data
    Mangla, Rohit
    Kumar, Shashi
    Nandy, Subrata
    [J]. LIDAR REMOTE SENSING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING XV, 2016, 9879
  • [49] Estimation of shrubland aboveground biomass of the desert steppe from optical and C-band SAR data
    Wang, X. Y.
    Pan, P. P.
    Lu, J.
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (15) : 4509 - 4526
  • [50] Forest aboveground biomass estimation in Zhejiang Province using the integration of Landsat TM and ALOS PALSAR data
    Zhao, Panpan
    Lu, Dengsheng
    Wang, Guangxing
    Liu, Lijuan
    Li, Dengqiu
    Zhu, Jinru
    Yu, Shuquan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2016, 53 : 1 - 15