Estimation of forest aboveground biomass and uncertainties by integration of field measurements, airborne LiDAR, and SAR and optical satellite data in Mexico

被引:98
|
作者
Urbazaev, Mikhail [1 ,2 ]
Thiel, Christian [1 ]
Cremer, Felix [1 ]
Dubayah, Ralph [3 ]
Migliavacca, Mirco [4 ]
Reichstein, Markus [4 ]
Schmullius, Christiane [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Schiller Univ Jena, Inst Geog, Dept Earth Observat, D-07743 Jena, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Biogeochem, IMPRS, D-07745 Jena, Germany
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[4] Max Planck Inst Biogeochem, Dept Biogeochem Integrat, D-07745 Jena, Germany
来源
关键词
GROWING STOCK VOLUME; TROPICAL FOREST; CARBON STOCKS; PALSAR DATA; BACKSCATTER; COVER; MAP; PERFORMANCE; IMAGERY; LASER;
D O I
10.1186/s13021-018-0093-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: Information on the spatial distribution of aboveground biomass (AGB) over large areas is needed for understanding and managing processes involved in the carbon cycle and supporting international policies for climate change mitigation and adaption. Furthermore, these products provide important baseline data for the development of sustainable management strategies to local stakeholders. The use of remote sensing data can provide spatially explicit information of AGB from local to global scales. In this study, we mapped national Mexican forest AGB using satellite remote sensing data and a machine learning approach. We modelled AGB using two scenarios: (1) extensive national forest inventory (NFI), and (2) airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) as reference data. Finally, we propagated uncertainties from field measurements to LiDAR-derived AGB and to the national wall-to-wall forest AGB map. Results: The estimated AGB maps (NFI- and LiDAR-calibrated) showed similar goodness-of-fit statistics (R-2 , Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)) at three different scales compared to the independent validation data set. We observed different spatial patterns of AGB in tropical dense forests, where no or limited number of NFI data were available, with higher AGB values in the LiDAR-calibrated map. We estimated much higher uncertainties in the AGB maps based on two-stage up-scaling method (i.e., from field measurements to LiDAR and from LiDAR-based estimates to satellite imagery) compared to the traditional field to satellite up-scaling. By removing LiDAR-based AGB pixels with high uncertainties, it was possible to estimate national forest AGB with similar uncertainties as calibrated with NFI data only. Conclusions: Since LiDAR data can be acquired much faster and for much larger areas compared to field inventory data, LiDAR is attractive for repetitive large scale AGB mapping. In this study, we showed that two-stage up-scaling methods for AGB estimation over large areas need to be analyzed and validated with great care. The uncertainties in the LiDAR-estimated AGB propagate further in the wall-to-wall map and can be up to 150%.Thus, when a two-stage up-scaling method is applied, it is crucial to characterize the uncertainties at all stages in order to generate robust results. Considering the findings mentioned above LiDAR can be used as an extension to NFI for example for areas that are difficult or not possible to access.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Estimation of coniferous forest aboveground biomass with aggregated airborne small-footprint LiDAR full-waveforms
    Qin, Haiming
    Wang, Cheng
    Xi, Xiaohuan
    Tian, Jianlin
    Zhou, Guoqing
    [J]. OPTICS EXPRESS, 2017, 25 (16): : A851 - A869
  • [32] Evaluating SAR-optical sensor fusion for aboveground biomass estimation in a Brazilian tropical forest
    Debastiani, Aline Bernarda
    Sanquetta, Carlos Roberto
    Dalla Corte, Ana Paula
    Rex, Franciel Eduardo
    Pinto, Naiara Sardinha
    [J]. ANNALS OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2019, 62 (01) : 109 - 122
  • [33] FOREST STRUCTURE ESTIMATION USING SAR, LIDAR, AND OPTICAL DATA IN THE CANADIAN BOREAL FOREST
    Benson, Michael
    Pierce, Leland
    Bergen, Kathleen
    Sarabandi, Kamal
    Zhang, Kailai
    Ryan, Caitlin
    [J]. 2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2011, : 2609 - 2612
  • [34] Forest aboveground biomass estimation combining ICESat-2 and GEDI spaceborne LiDAR data
    Meng, Ge
    Zhao, Dan
    Xu, Cong
    Chen, Junhua
    Li, Xiuwen
    Zheng, Zhaoju
    Zeng, Yuan
    [J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2024, 28 (06) : 1632 - 1647
  • [35] JOINT MODELING OF SPACEBORNE RADAR AND LIDAR DATA WITH ENSEMBLE LEARNING FOR FOREST ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS ESTIMATION
    Jiang, Fu-Gen
    Ming-Dian-Li
    Chen, Si-Wei
    [J]. 2024 4TH URSI ATLANTIC RADIO SCIENCE MEETING, AT-RASC 2024, 2024,
  • [36] ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS ESTIMATION OF TROPICAL PEAT SWAMP FORESTS USING SAR AND OPTICAL DATA
    Englhart, Sandra
    Franke, Jonas
    Keuck, Vanessa
    Siegert, Florian
    [J]. 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2012, : 6577 - 6580
  • [37] Forest biomass estimation from airborne LiDAR data using machine learning approaches
    Gleason, Colin J.
    Im, Jungho
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 125 : 80 - 91
  • [38] Estimation of forest parameters by airborne LiDAR data and RapidEye satellite imagery: Sensitivity study
    Monnet, Jean-Matthieu
    Chirouze, Émilie
    Mermin, Éric
    [J]. Revue Francaise de Photogrammetrie et de Teledetection, 2015, (211-212): : 71 - 79
  • [39] Satellite lidar vs. small footprint airborne lidar: Comparing the accuracy of aboveground biomass estimates and forest structure metrics at footprint level
    Popescu, Sorin C.
    Zhao, Kaiguang
    Neuenschwander, Amy
    Lin, Chinsu
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 115 (11) : 2786 - 2797
  • [40] Estimating forest aboveground biomass using small-footprint full-waveform airborne LiDAR data
    Luo, Shezhou
    Wang, Cheng
    Xi, Xiaohuan
    Nie, Sheng
    Fan, Xieyu
    Chen, Hanyue
    Ma, Dan
    Liu, Jinfu
    Zou, Jie
    Lin, Yi
    Zhou, Guoqing
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2019, 83