Comparative study between 1.5 and 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI systems using the PIRADS version 2 classification in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Rodriguez Cabello, Miguel Angel [1 ]
Mendez Rubio, Santiago [1 ]
Moraga Sanz, Alvaro [1 ]
Sanz Miguelanez, Juan Luis [1 ]
Vazquez Alba, David [1 ]
Aullo Gonzalez, Carolina [2 ]
Platas Sancho, Arturo [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ La Moraleja, Serv Urol, Avda Francisco Pi y Margall 81, Madrid 28050, Spain
[2] Univ Francisco de Vitoria, Hosp Univ La Moraleja, Serv Radiodiagnost, Avda Francisco Pi y Margall 81, Madrid 28050, Spain
来源
ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA | 2022年 / 75卷 / 04期
关键词
Multiparametric prostatic MRI (mpMRI); 1.5-Tesla; 3-Tesla; Prostate cancer; PIRADS; ACCURACY; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20227504.47
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The 3-Tesla multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) system represents a diagnostic advance for prostate cancer. Our aim is to demonstrate that the results in 1.5-Tesla mpMRI are not inferior compared to the 3-Tesla for the correct diagnosis of prostate cancer. Material and methods: Non-inferiority comparative cross-sectional study between fusion-guided prostate biopsy results. 344 patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (elevated PSA and/or suspicious DRE) and mpMRI interpreted and verified by the same radiologists in all cases, 270 in 1.5-Tesla and 74 in 3-Tesla, with at least one lesion PIRADSv2 >= 3. Exclusion criteria were positive biopsy or previous prostate treatment. We consider malignancy as ISUP >= 1 and significant tumor as ISUP >= 2. We used Wilcoxon and t-student test (central tendency measures), diagnostic test (gold standard: ISUP of targeted biopsy), Chi2 test and Z-test (comparison of prevalences and 95%CI malignancy and significant tumor according to mpMRI). Results: Median prostate volume 50cc(IQR:33.5) and PSA 6.11ng/ml(IQR:3.39). Mean age 67.4 +/- 8.1years. Number of suspicious lesions/patient: mpMRI 1.3 (1.5-Tesla) and 1.5 (3-Tesla). No differences were found between mpMRI (homogeneous and comparable samples). 57% (1.5-Tesla) vs 66% (3-Tesla) of targeted biopsies were malignant, and 34%vs38% were significant tumor, with no significant differences. Se, Sp, PPV and NPV for malignancy (1.5-Tesla vs 3-Tesla) were 96%vs90%, 38%vs44%, 67%vs76%, and 86%vs69%, with no significant differences. Conclusions: There are no significant differences between 1.5-Tesla vs 3-Tesla mpMRI regarding targeted biopsy results. Not to have 3-Tesla mpMRI may not be a limitation to use 1.5-Tesla as a diagnostic test for the better diagnosis of prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 338
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Correlation Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Gleason Score (GS) in Prostate Cancer Patients (PCP) by Using 3.0 Tesla Multiparametric MRI (3T mMRI)
    Counago, F.
    Del Cerro, E.
    Recio, M.
    Murillo, R.
    Diaz, A. A.
    Marcos, F. J.
    Cano, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S410 - S410
  • [42] Prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy using pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI PIRADS scoring system
    Alqahtani, Saeed
    Wei, Cheng
    Zhang, Yilong
    Szewczyk-Bieda, Magdalena
    Wilson, Jennifer
    Huang, Zhihong
    Nabi, Ghulam
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [43] Comparative analysis of prostate cancer detection on 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (3-T-mp-MRI) with histopathology on whole mount radical prostatectomies
    Gonzalez Peramato, P.
    Ruz Caracul, I.
    Garcia-Fernandez, E.
    Caparros Canovas, S.
    Saturio Galan, N.
    Martin Hervas, C.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2017, 471 : S270 - S270
  • [44] Diagnostic evaluation and incorporation of PSA density and the prostate imaging and data reporting system (PIRADS) version 2 classification in risk-nomograms for prostate cancer
    Rodriguez Cabello, Miguel Angel
    Mendez Rubio, Santiago
    Platas Sancho, Arturo
    Carballido Rodriguez, Joaquin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (10) : 2439 - 2450
  • [45] Diagnostic Value of Integrated PET/MRI for Detection and Localization of Prostate Cancer: Comparative Study of Multiparametric MRI and PET/CT
    Lee, Myoung Seok
    Cho, Jeong Yeon
    Kim, Sang Youn
    Cheon, Gi Jeong
    Moon, Min Hoan
    Oh, Sohee
    Lee, Joongyub
    Lee, Seunghyun
    Woo, Sungmin
    Kim, Seung Hyup
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 45 (02) : 597 - 609
  • [46] Comparison of accuracy between 3-Tesla MRI and the Partin Tables for the staging of prostate cancer
    Augustin, H.
    Fritz, G.
    Ehammer, T.
    Zigeuner, R.
    Purnmer, K.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 7 (03) : 283 - 283
  • [47] Prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy using pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI PIRADS scoring system
    Saeed Alqahtani
    Cheng Wei
    Yilong Zhang
    Magdalena Szewczyk-Bieda
    Jennifer Wilson
    Zhihong Huang
    Ghulam Nabi
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [48] Prospective evaluation of multiparametric MRI of prostate and the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) version 2 for prostate cancer detection
    Lim, L. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 22 - 23
  • [49] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT aND MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCER: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE
    Kang, Jinseok
    Lee, Jong Hoon
    Yu, Jiwoong
    Choi, Seongik
    Wan, Song
    Kang, Minyong
    Sung, Hyun Hwan
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Seo, Seong Il
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2025, 213 (5S):
  • [50] Diagnostic evaluation and incorporation of PSA density and the prostate imaging and data reporting system (PIRADS) version 2 classification in risk-nomograms for prostate cancer
    Miguel Angel Rodríguez Cabello
    Santiago Méndez Rubio
    Arturo Platas Sancho
    Joaquin Carballido Rodríguez
    World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 2439 - 2450