Comparative study between 1.5 and 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI systems using the PIRADS version 2 classification in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Rodriguez Cabello, Miguel Angel [1 ]
Mendez Rubio, Santiago [1 ]
Moraga Sanz, Alvaro [1 ]
Sanz Miguelanez, Juan Luis [1 ]
Vazquez Alba, David [1 ]
Aullo Gonzalez, Carolina [2 ]
Platas Sancho, Arturo [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ La Moraleja, Serv Urol, Avda Francisco Pi y Margall 81, Madrid 28050, Spain
[2] Univ Francisco de Vitoria, Hosp Univ La Moraleja, Serv Radiodiagnost, Avda Francisco Pi y Margall 81, Madrid 28050, Spain
来源
ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA | 2022年 / 75卷 / 04期
关键词
Multiparametric prostatic MRI (mpMRI); 1.5-Tesla; 3-Tesla; Prostate cancer; PIRADS; ACCURACY; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20227504.47
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The 3-Tesla multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) system represents a diagnostic advance for prostate cancer. Our aim is to demonstrate that the results in 1.5-Tesla mpMRI are not inferior compared to the 3-Tesla for the correct diagnosis of prostate cancer. Material and methods: Non-inferiority comparative cross-sectional study between fusion-guided prostate biopsy results. 344 patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (elevated PSA and/or suspicious DRE) and mpMRI interpreted and verified by the same radiologists in all cases, 270 in 1.5-Tesla and 74 in 3-Tesla, with at least one lesion PIRADSv2 >= 3. Exclusion criteria were positive biopsy or previous prostate treatment. We consider malignancy as ISUP >= 1 and significant tumor as ISUP >= 2. We used Wilcoxon and t-student test (central tendency measures), diagnostic test (gold standard: ISUP of targeted biopsy), Chi2 test and Z-test (comparison of prevalences and 95%CI malignancy and significant tumor according to mpMRI). Results: Median prostate volume 50cc(IQR:33.5) and PSA 6.11ng/ml(IQR:3.39). Mean age 67.4 +/- 8.1years. Number of suspicious lesions/patient: mpMRI 1.3 (1.5-Tesla) and 1.5 (3-Tesla). No differences were found between mpMRI (homogeneous and comparable samples). 57% (1.5-Tesla) vs 66% (3-Tesla) of targeted biopsies were malignant, and 34%vs38% were significant tumor, with no significant differences. Se, Sp, PPV and NPV for malignancy (1.5-Tesla vs 3-Tesla) were 96%vs90%, 38%vs44%, 67%vs76%, and 86%vs69%, with no significant differences. Conclusions: There are no significant differences between 1.5-Tesla vs 3-Tesla mpMRI regarding targeted biopsy results. Not to have 3-Tesla mpMRI may not be a limitation to use 1.5-Tesla as a diagnostic test for the better diagnosis of prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 338
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI for GTV-definition of Dominant Intraprostatic Lesions in patients with Prostate Cancer - an interobserver variability study
    Rischke, Hans Christian
    Nestle, Ursula
    Fechter, Tobias
    Doll, Christian
    Volegova-Neher, Natalja
    Henne, Karl
    Scholber, Jutta
    Knippen, Stefan
    Kirste, Simon
    Grosu, Anca L.
    Jilg, Cordula A.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
  • [22] The role of diffusion 3-Tesla MRI in detecting prostate cancer before needle biopsy: multiparametric study of 111 patients
    Roy, C.
    Pasquali, R.
    Matau, A.
    Bazille, G.
    Lang, H.
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2010, 91 (11): : 1121 - 1128
  • [23] 3-Tesla MRI for the evaluation of spreading area of ductal carcinoma in situ: a comparative study with 1.5-Tesla MRI.
    Kubo, M.
    Shirahane, K.
    Tanaka, M.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 69 (02) : 260S - 260S
  • [24] A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HISTOSCANNINGTM AND MULTIPARAMETRIC 3TESLA MRI FOR THE PREDICTION OF CANCER FOCI IN MEN UNDERGOING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Orczyk, Clement
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Wysock, James
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Taneja, Samir S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E72 - E72
  • [25] Accuracy of 3 Tesla pelvic phased-array multiparametric MRI in diagnosing prostate cancer at repeat biopsy
    Pepe, Pietro
    Garufi, Antonio
    Priolo, Giandomenico
    Dibenedetto, Giuseppe
    Salemi, Michele
    Pennisi, Michele
    Fraggetta, Filippo
    Aragona, Francesco
    Barbera, Michele
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2014, 86 (04) : 336 - 339
  • [26] Prevalence and grade of malignancy differences with respect to the area of involvement in multiparametric resonance imaging of the prostate in the diagnosis of prostate cancer using the PI-RADS version 2 classification
    Miguel Angel Rodríguez-Cabello
    Santiago Méndez-Rubio
    Juan Luis Sanz-Miguelañez
    Alvaro Moraga-Sanz
    Carolina Aulló-González
    Arturo Platas-Sancho
    World Journal of Urology, 2023, 41 : 2155 - 2163
  • [27] Prevalence and grade of malignancy differences with respect to the area of involvement in multiparametric resonance imaging of the prostate in the diagnosis of prostate cancer using the PI-RADS version 2 classification
    Rodriguez-Cabello, Miguel Angel
    Mendez-Rubio, Santiago
    Sanz-Miguelanez, Juan Luis
    Moraga-Sanz, Alvaro
    Aullo-Gonzalez, Carolina
    Platas-Sancho, Arturo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (08) : 2155 - 2163
  • [28] Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer in the peripheral zone using multiparametric MRI
    Niaf, Emilie
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Mege-Lechevallier, Florence
    Bratan, Flavie
    Lartizien, Carole
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (12): : 3833 - 3851
  • [29] A Comparative Study of Multiparametric MRI Sequences in Measuring Prostate Cancer Index Lesion Volume
    Bagcilar, Omer
    Alis, Deniz
    Seker, Mustafa
    Erdemli, Servet
    Karaarslan, Umut
    Kus, Aylin
    Kayhan, Cavit
    Saglican, Yesim
    Kural, Ali
    Karaarslan, Ercan
    JOURNAL OF THE BELGIAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 106 (01):
  • [30] 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI for GTV-definition of dominant intraprostatic lesions in patients with prostate cancer-an interobserver variability study
    Rischke, H. C.
    Nestle, U.
    Fechter, T.
    Doll, C.
    Volegova-Neher, N.
    Henne, K.
    Scholber, J.
    Knippen, S.
    Kirste, S.
    Grosu, A. L.
    Jilg, C. A.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2013, 189 : 83 - 83