Selecting cost-effective plant mixes to support pollinators

被引:35
|
作者
Williams, Neal M. [1 ]
Lonsdorf, Eric V. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Entomol & Nematol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Inst Environm, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
Bees; Pollinator enhancement; Seed mix; Decision tool; Optimization; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; NATIVE BEES; WILD; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; DISTRIBUTIONS; VISITATION; DIVERSITY; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.032
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Growing concern about wild and managed pollinator populations has led to efforts to create floral habitat to promote bees and other pollinators, especially in agricultural lands where they make important contributions to crop pollination. These actions all require practitioners to determine what mixture of plant species to select to best support diverse and functionally important pollinators. Like in the selection of areas for nature reserves, plant choices must balance function against differences in cost. To date, plant mixes have been compiled using expert opinion based on the performance of individual species, but researchers and practitioners have called for a systematic approach to optimize mixtures. We applied a decision analytic approach to select best flowering mixes to meet two specified objectives at the least cost: maximizing total bee richness or maximizing crop pollinating bees. The model identified best plant mixes for each objective across a range of budgets. Accounting for the variation in costs among plant species allowed for substantially more cost effective mixes with little loss in achieving the target objective. Including multiple objectives simultaneously revealed the power of the approach to meet complex goals. The resulting mix supported over 96% of the bee species for both goals at no difference in cost. This gain in efficiency could dramatically increase the extent of habitat implemented and remove financial barriers to adoption by stakeholders and conservation practitioners.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 202
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PROMOTING COST-EFFECTIVE PRESCRIBING - COST-EFFECTIVENESS STUDIES MAY NOT BE COST-EFFECTIVE
    TOWSE, A
    WELLS, N
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (6997): : 126 - 126
  • [42] A decision tree for selecting the most cost-effective waste disposal strategy in foodservice operations
    Wie, S
    Shanklin, CW
    Lee, KE
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 2003, 103 (04) : 475 - 482
  • [43] SELECTING COST-EFFECTIVE SURVEY METHODS - FOOT-IN-DOOR AND PREPAID MONETARY INCENTIVES
    OKEEFE, TB
    HOMER, PM
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1987, 15 (04) : 365 - 376
  • [44] SELECTING COST-EFFECTIVE ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS IN SURGERY - ARE WE GETTING WHAT WE PAY FOR
    ROACH, AC
    KERNODLE, DS
    KAISER, AB
    DICP-THE ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1990, 24 (02): : 183 - 185
  • [45] Cost-effective HIPing
    Zimmerman, Franz
    Bergman, Carl
    Westerlund, Jan
    International Journal of Powder Metallurgy (Princeton, New Jersey), 1999, 35 (03): : 31 - 35
  • [46] IS INTERVENTION COST-EFFECTIVE
    RECKLESS, JPD
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 68 (805) : 882 - 883
  • [47] Apixaban is cost-effective
    Gregory B. Lim
    Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2014, 11 (4) : 187 - 187
  • [48] IS CAI COST-EFFECTIVE
    LEVIN, HM
    MEISTER, G
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 1986, 67 (10) : 745 - 749
  • [49] ARE EXPANSIONS COST-EFFECTIVE
    BARKALOW, PW
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1982, 19 : 352 - 352
  • [50] COST-EFFECTIVE IRRIGATION
    BOWBEER, A
    WORLD CROPS AND LIVESTOCK, 1977, 29 (04): : 181 - &