Selecting cost-effective plant mixes to support pollinators

被引:35
|
作者
Williams, Neal M. [1 ]
Lonsdorf, Eric V. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Entomol & Nematol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Inst Environm, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
Bees; Pollinator enhancement; Seed mix; Decision tool; Optimization; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; NATIVE BEES; WILD; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; DISTRIBUTIONS; VISITATION; DIVERSITY; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.032
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Growing concern about wild and managed pollinator populations has led to efforts to create floral habitat to promote bees and other pollinators, especially in agricultural lands where they make important contributions to crop pollination. These actions all require practitioners to determine what mixture of plant species to select to best support diverse and functionally important pollinators. Like in the selection of areas for nature reserves, plant choices must balance function against differences in cost. To date, plant mixes have been compiled using expert opinion based on the performance of individual species, but researchers and practitioners have called for a systematic approach to optimize mixtures. We applied a decision analytic approach to select best flowering mixes to meet two specified objectives at the least cost: maximizing total bee richness or maximizing crop pollinating bees. The model identified best plant mixes for each objective across a range of budgets. Accounting for the variation in costs among plant species allowed for substantially more cost effective mixes with little loss in achieving the target objective. Including multiple objectives simultaneously revealed the power of the approach to meet complex goals. The resulting mix supported over 96% of the bee species for both goals at no difference in cost. This gain in efficiency could dramatically increase the extent of habitat implemented and remove financial barriers to adoption by stakeholders and conservation practitioners.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 202
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decision Support Model for Determining Cost-Effective Renovation Time
    Cho, Kyuman
    Yoon, Yoojung
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2016, 32 (03)
  • [32] COST-EFFECTIVE APPLICATIONS IN SPACE TRANSPORTATION DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
    DAVIS, MJ
    GREENBERG, JS
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 1988, 17 (04) : 407 - 413
  • [33] Dialysis: Cost-effective "SUPPORT" for patients with acute renal failure
    Chertow, GM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1998, 31 (03) : 545 - 548
  • [34] Design Guidelines of Cost-Effective Support System for Industrial Reactors
    Bedair, Osama
    PRACTICE PERIODICAL ON STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 26 (03)
  • [35] COST-EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF NUTRITION SUPPORT - DISCUSSION AND CLOSING REMARKS
    PENCHARZ, P
    POULIN, E
    STANSFIELD, S
    BAKER, JP
    BRYLOWSKI, LM
    HARRISON, D
    JOURNAL OF THE CANADIAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION-REVUE DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES DIETETISTES, 1988, 49 (02): : 125 - 127
  • [36] Effective maybe, but is it cost-effective?
    Varma, Murali
    Griffiths, David F. R.
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2015, 66 (02) : 315 - 316
  • [37] Toward cost-effective staffing mixes for Veterans Affairs substance use disorder treatment programs
    Im, Jinwoo J.
    Shachter, Ross D.
    Finney, John W.
    Trafton, Jodie A.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
  • [38] Plant ultrasound detection: a cost-effective method for identifying plant ultrasonic emissions
    Bonisoli, Luca
    Pelicella, Ivano
    Arru, Laura
    PLANT SIGNALING & BEHAVIOR, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [39] COST-EFFECTIVE AND RELIABLE DESIGN OF A SOLAR THERMAL POWER PLANT
    Aliabadi, A. A.
    Wallace, J. S.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE CANADIAN SOCIETY FOR MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 33 (01) : 25 - 37
  • [40] A cost-effective approach to estimate plant available water capacity
    Gajurel, Suman
    Lai, Yunru
    Lobsey, Craig
    Pembleton, Keith G.
    GEODERMA, 2024, 442