Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Value of Normalized Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Using the Spleen as Reference Organ

被引:105
|
作者
Do, Richard K. G. [1 ]
Chandanara, Hersh [1 ]
Felker, Ely [2 ]
Hajdu, Cristina H. [3 ]
Babb, James S. [1 ]
Kim, Danny [1 ]
Taouli, Bachir [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Radiol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU, Sch Med, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[3] NYU, Dept Pathol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
apparent diffusion coefficient; cirrhosis; diffusion-weighted MRI; liver fibrosis; MRI; CHRONIC HEPATITIS; PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE; ABDOMINAL ORGANS; MRI; REPRODUCIBILITY; QUANTIFICATION; BREATHHOLD; SEQUENCES; PERFUSION; ABDOMEN;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.09.3448
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of liver apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) versus normalized liver ADC using the spleen as a reference organ for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-six patients, 34 with liver disease and 22 control subjects, were assessed with breath-hold single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging using b values of 0, 50, and 500 s/mm(2). Liver ADC and normalized liver ADC (defined as the ratio of liver ADC to spleen ADC) were compared between patients stratified by fibrosis stage. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the performance of ADC and normalized liver ADC for prediction of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Reproducibility was assessed by measuring coefficient of variation (n = 7). RESULTS. Liver ADC failed to distinguish individual stages of fibrosis, except between stages 0 and 4. There were significant differences in normalized liver ADC between control livers and intermediate stages of fibrosis (stages 2-3) and cirrhosis (stage 4) and between stages 1 and 4, and there was a trend toward significance between stages 0 and 1 (p = 0.051) and stages 1 and 3 (p = 0.06). ROC analysis showed that normalized liver ADC was superior to liver ADC for detection of stage >= 2 (area under the ROC curve, 0.864 vs 0.655; p = 0.013) and stage >= 3 (0.805 vs 0.689; p = 0.015), without a difference for diagnosing cirrhosis (0.935 vs 0.720; p = 0.185). Normalized liver ADC had higher reproducibility than ADC (mean coefficient of variation, 3.5% vs 12.6%). CONCLUSION. Our results suggest that normalizing liver ADC with spleen ADC improves diagnostic accuracy for detection of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis when using breath-hold diffusion-weighted imaging, with better reproducibility.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 676
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements with diffusion-weighted imaging for differential diagnosis of soft-tissue tumor
    Zou, Yu
    Wang, Qi-Dong
    Zong, Min
    Zou, Yue-Fen
    Shi, Hai-Bin
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 12 (02) : 864 - 870
  • [32] Characterization of Liver Tumors by Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Comparison of Diagnostic Performance Using the Mean and Minimum Apparent Diffusion Coefficient
    Namimoto, Tomohiro
    Nakagawa, Masataka
    Kizaki, Yuuki
    Itatani, Ryo
    Kidoh, Masafumi
    Utsunomiya, Daisuke
    Oda, Seitaro
    Yamashita, Yasuyuki
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2015, 39 (04) : 453 - 461
  • [33] Predicting liver metastasis of gastrointestinal tract cancer by diffusion-weighted imaging of apparent diffusion coefficient values
    De-Xian Zheng
    Shu-Chun Meng
    Qing-Jun Liu
    Chuan-Ting Li
    Xi-Dan Shang
    Yu-Seng Zhu
    Tian-Jun Bai
    Shi-Ming Xu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2016, 22 (10) : 3031 - 3037
  • [34] Predicting liver metastasis of gastrointestinal tract cancer by diffusion-weighted imaging of apparent diffusion coefficient values
    Zheng, De-Xian
    Meng, Shu-Chun
    Liu, Qing-Jun
    Li, Chuan-Ting
    Shang, Xi-Dan
    Zhu, Yu-Seng
    Bai, Tian-Jun
    Xu, Shi-Ming
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 22 (10) : 3031 - 3037
  • [35] Can Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps Distinguish Cholangiocarcinoma From Benign Hepatic Fibrosis?
    Webb, H.
    Kelcz, F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (05)
  • [36] Application of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Detection of Active Sacroiliitis and the Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Relative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values
    Toslak, Iclal Erdem
    Bilgilisoy Filiz, Meral
    Cekic, Bulent
    Parlak, Ayse Eda
    Cay, Hasan Fatih
    Yildiz, Sevim
    Erol, Bekir
    Ozel, Deniz
    Sezer, Ilhan
    ARCHIVES OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 31 (03): : 254 - 264
  • [37] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient and apparent diffusion tensor maps in cervical spondylotic myelopathy
    Demir, A
    Ries, M
    Moonen, CTW
    Vital, LM
    Dehais, J
    Arne, P
    Caillé, JM
    Dousset, V
    RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [38] Diffusion anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient in brain edema measured by diffusion-weighted MR imaging
    Moritani, T
    Nakai, K
    Zhong, J
    Westesson, PA
    Kinoshita, T
    Shrier, DA
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 346 - 346
  • [39] Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient value on diffusion-weighted MR imaging and Gleason score in prostate cancer
    Wu, X.
    Reinikainen, P.
    Vanhanen, A.
    Kapanen, M.
    Vierikko, T.
    Ryymin, P.
    Hyodynmaa, S.
    Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P. -L.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2017, 98 (01) : 63 - 71
  • [40] Diffusion-weighted imaging of the parotid gland:: Influence of the choice of b-values on the apparent diffusion coefficient value
    Thoeny, HC
    De Keyzer, F
    Boesch, C
    Hermans, R
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 20 (05) : 786 - 790