Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Value of Normalized Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Using the Spleen as Reference Organ

被引:105
|
作者
Do, Richard K. G. [1 ]
Chandanara, Hersh [1 ]
Felker, Ely [2 ]
Hajdu, Cristina H. [3 ]
Babb, James S. [1 ]
Kim, Danny [1 ]
Taouli, Bachir [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Radiol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU, Sch Med, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[3] NYU, Dept Pathol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
apparent diffusion coefficient; cirrhosis; diffusion-weighted MRI; liver fibrosis; MRI; CHRONIC HEPATITIS; PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE; ABDOMINAL ORGANS; MRI; REPRODUCIBILITY; QUANTIFICATION; BREATHHOLD; SEQUENCES; PERFUSION; ABDOMEN;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.09.3448
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of liver apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) versus normalized liver ADC using the spleen as a reference organ for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-six patients, 34 with liver disease and 22 control subjects, were assessed with breath-hold single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging using b values of 0, 50, and 500 s/mm(2). Liver ADC and normalized liver ADC (defined as the ratio of liver ADC to spleen ADC) were compared between patients stratified by fibrosis stage. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the performance of ADC and normalized liver ADC for prediction of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Reproducibility was assessed by measuring coefficient of variation (n = 7). RESULTS. Liver ADC failed to distinguish individual stages of fibrosis, except between stages 0 and 4. There were significant differences in normalized liver ADC between control livers and intermediate stages of fibrosis (stages 2-3) and cirrhosis (stage 4) and between stages 1 and 4, and there was a trend toward significance between stages 0 and 1 (p = 0.051) and stages 1 and 3 (p = 0.06). ROC analysis showed that normalized liver ADC was superior to liver ADC for detection of stage >= 2 (area under the ROC curve, 0.864 vs 0.655; p = 0.013) and stage >= 3 (0.805 vs 0.689; p = 0.015), without a difference for diagnosing cirrhosis (0.935 vs 0.720; p = 0.185). Normalized liver ADC had higher reproducibility than ADC (mean coefficient of variation, 3.5% vs 12.6%). CONCLUSION. Our results suggest that normalizing liver ADC with spleen ADC improves diagnostic accuracy for detection of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis when using breath-hold diffusion-weighted imaging, with better reproducibility.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 676
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The value of diffusion-weighted imaging for monitoring the chemotherapeutic response of osteosarcoma: a comparison between average apparent diffusion coefficient and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient
    Kiyoshi Oka
    Toshitake Yakushiji
    Hiro Sato
    Toshinori Hirai
    Yasuyuki Yamashita
    Hiroshi Mizuta
    Skeletal Radiology, 2010, 39 : 141 - 146
  • [22] Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the spleen in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension
    Klasen, Janina
    Lanzman, Rotem Shlomo
    Wittsack, Hans-Joerg
    Kircheis, Gerald
    Schek, Julia
    Quentin, Michael
    Antoch, Gerald
    Haeussinger, Dieter
    Blondin, Dirk
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 31 (07) : 1092 - 1096
  • [23] Can Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Related Apparent Diffusion Coefficient be a Prognostic Value in Women With Breast Cancer?
    Rabasco, Paola
    Caivano, Rocchina
    Simeon, Vittorio
    Dinardo, Giuseppina
    Lotumolo, Antonella
    Gioioso, Matilde
    Villonio, Antonio
    Iannelli, Giancarlo
    D'Antuono, Felice
    Zandolino, Alexis
    Macarini, Luca
    Guglielmi, Giuseppe
    Cammarota, Aldo
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2017, 35 (02) : 92 - 99
  • [24] Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging performed with quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient values for cervical lymphadenopathy
    Wu, Lian-Ming
    Xu, Jian-Rong
    Hua, Jia
    Gu, Hai-Yan
    Zhu, Jiong
    Hu, Jiani
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 38 (03) : 663 - 670
  • [25] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Breast Cancer: Correlation of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value with Pathologic Prognostic Factors
    Tezcan, Sehnaz
    Uslu, Nihal
    Ozturk, Funda Ulu
    Akcay, Eda Yilmaz
    Tezcaner, Tugan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2019, 15 (04) : 262 - 267
  • [26] Beyond Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Diffusion-Weighted MRI of Small Liver Lesions
    Johnson, P.
    Jurasic, M.
    Bridges, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05)
  • [27] Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value Measured Through Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Qu, Rong-Feng
    Guo, Dong-Rui
    Chang, Zhe-Xing
    Meng, Jie
    Sun, Yan
    Hao, Shu-Hong
    Shi, Guang
    Sun, Jian
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2015, 39 (04) : 513 - 522
  • [28] Evaluation of the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient
    Ju, Fa-Jun
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2016, 9 : 7555 - 7561
  • [29] Evaluating Spinal Canal Lesions Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
    Kanamoto, Hirohito
    Norimoto, Masaki
    Eguchi, Yawara
    Oikawa, Yasuhiro
    Orita, Sumihisa
    Inage, Kazuhide
    Abe, Koki
    Inoue, Masahiro
    Kinoshita, Hideyuki
    Umimura, Tomotaka
    Matsumoto, Koji
    Masuda, Yoshitada
    Furuya, Takeo
    Koda, Masao
    Aoki, Yasuchika
    Watanabe, Atsuya
    Takahashi, Kazuhisa
    Ohtori, Seiji
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 14 (03) : 312 - 319
  • [30] Diffusion-weighted imaging with calculated apparent diffusion coefficient in intracranial hemorrhagic lesions
    Dorenbeck, U
    Schlaier, J
    Bretschneider, T
    Schuierer, G
    Feuerbach, S
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2005, 29 (02) : 86 - 93