Intertemporal permit trading for the control of greenhouse gas emissions

被引:72
|
作者
Leiby, P
Rubin, J
机构
[1] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Energy, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[2] Univ Maine, Dept Resource Econ & Policy, Margaret Chase Smith Ctr Publ Policy, Orono, ME 04469 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS | 2001年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
emission trading; greenhouse gases; marketable permits; stock pollutant;
D O I
10.1023/A:1011124215404
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper integrates two themes in the intertemporal permit literature through the construction of an intertemporal banking system for a pollutant that creates both stock and flow damages. A permit banking system for the special case of a pollutant that only causes stock damages is also developed. This latter, simpler case corresponds roughly to the greenhouse gas emission reduction regime proposed by the U.S. Department of State as a means of fulfilling the U.S. commitment to the Framework Convention on Climate Change. This paper shows that environmental regulators can achieve the socially optimal level of emissions and output through time by setting the correct total sum of allowable emissions, and specifying the correct intertemporal trading ratio for banking and borrowing. For the case of greenhouse gases, we show that the optimal growth rate of permit prices, and therefore the optimal intertemporal trading rate, has the closed-form solution equal to the ratio of current marginal stock damages to the discounted future value of marginal stock damages less the decay rate of emissions in the atmosphere. Given a non-optimal negotiated emission path we then derive a permit banking system that has the potential to lower net social costs by adjusting the intertemporal trading ratio taking into account the behavior of private agents. We use a simple numerical simulation model to illustrate the potential gains from various possible banking systems.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 256
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal intensity targets for greenhouse gas emissions trading under uncertainty
    Jotzo, Frank
    Pezzey, John C. V.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2007, 38 (02): : 259 - 284
  • [32] International Emission Trading and the Cost of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation and Sequestration
    Michael J. Scott
    James A. Edmonds
    Natesan Mahasenan
    Joseph M. Roop
    Anthony L. Brunello
    Erik F. Haites
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2004, 64 : 257 - 287
  • [33] Emissions trading as a policy option for greenhouse gas mitigation in South Africa
    Tyler, Emily
    du Toit, Michelle
    Burchell, Zelda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY IN SOUTHERN AFRICA, 2011, 22 (01) : 26 - 41
  • [34] An automated system of emissions permit trading for transportation firms
    Yuan, Quan
    Hua, Zhongsheng
    Shen, Bin
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2021, 152
  • [35] An automated system of emissions permit trading for transportation firms
    Yuan, Quan
    Hua, Zhongsheng
    Shen, Bin
    [J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2021, 152
  • [36] The Valuation Relevance of Greenhouse Gas Emissions under the European Union Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme
    Clarkson, Peter M.
    Li, Yue
    Pinnuck, Matthew
    Richardson, Gordon D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2015, 24 (03) : 551 - 580
  • [37] Organizing emissions trading: the barrier of domestic permit allocation
    Woerdman, E
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (09) : 613 - 623
  • [38] Emissions trading with profit-neutral permit allocations
    Hepburn, Cameron J.
    Quah, John K. -H.
    Ritz, Robert A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2013, 98 : 85 - 99
  • [39] Exploration in Accounting Treatment of Carbon Emissions Permit Trading
    Yu, Xingwu
    [J]. 2015 5th International Conference on Applied Social Science (ICASS 2015), Pt 3, 2015, 82 : 278 - 283
  • [40] Joint Control of Emissions Permit Trading andProduction Involving Fixed and Variable Transaction Costs
    Yuan, Quan
    Chen, Youhua
    Yang, Jian
    Zhou, Yun
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2018, 27 (08) : 1420 - 1454