Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) for Peritoneal Metastasis: A Registry Study

被引:53
|
作者
Kurtz, Florian [1 ]
Struller, Florian [1 ]
Horvath, Philipp [1 ]
Solass, Wiebke [2 ]
Boesmueller, Hans [2 ]
Koenigsrainer, Alfred [1 ]
Reymond, Marc A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Karls Eberhard Univ Tubingen, Dept Gen Surg, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Karls Eberhard Univ Tubingen, Inst Pathol, Tubingen, Germany
[3] Natl Ctr Pleura & Peritoneum, Comprehens Canc Ctr South Western Germany, Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
LOW-DOSE CISPLATIN; OVARIAN-CANCER; PHARMACOKINETIC PROBLEMS; INTRAABDOMINAL PRESSURE; INNOVATIVE APPROACH; GASTRIC-CANCER; 1ST EVIDENCE; DOXORUBICIN; CARCINOMATOSIS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1155/2018/2743985
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel drug delivery system with superior pharmacological properties for treating peritoneal metastasis (PM). Safety and efficacy results of PIPAC with cisplatin/doxorubicin or oxaliplatin from a registry cohort are presented. Methods. IRB-approved registry study. Retrospective analysis. No predefined inclusion criteria, individual therapeutic recommendation by the interdisciplinary tumor board. Safety assessment with CTCAE 4.0. Histological assessment of tumor response by an independent pathologist using the 4-tied peritoneal regression grading system (PRGS). Mean PRGS and ascites volume were assessed at each PIPAC. Results. A total of 142 PIPAC procedures were scheduled in 71 consecutive patients with PM from gastric (n = 26), colorectal (n = 17), hepatobiliary/pancreatic (n = 9), ovarian (n = 6), appendiceal (n = 5) origin, pseudomyxoma peritonei (n = 4), and other tumors (n = 3). Mean age was 58 +/- 13 years. Patients were heavily pretreated. Mean PCI was 19 +/- 13. Laparoscopic nonaccess rate was 11/142 procedures (7.7%). Mean number of PIPAC/patient was 2. All patients were eligible for safety analysis. There was no procedure-related mortality. There were 2.8% intraoperative and 4.9% postoperative complications. 39 patients underwent more than one PIPAC and were eligible for efficacy analysis, and PRGS could be assessed in 36 of them. In 24 patients (67%), PRGS improved or remained unchanged at PIPAC#2, reflecting tumor regression or stable disease. Ascites was present in 24 patients and diminished significantly under therapy. Median survival was 11.8 months (95% CI: 7.45-16.2 months) from PIPAC#1. Conclusion. PIPAC is feasible, safe, and well-tolerated and can induce histological regression in a significant proportion of pretreated PM patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin in colorectal peritoneal metastasis
    Demtroeder, C.
    Solass, W.
    Zieren, J.
    Strumberg, D.
    Giger-Pabst, U.
    Reymond, M. -A.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 18 (04) : 364 - 371
  • [42] Selection Criteria for Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) Treatment in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases
    Balmer, Aurelie
    Clerc, Daniel
    Toussaint, Laura
    Sgarbura, Olivia
    Taibi, Abdelkader
    Hubner, Martin
    Teixeira Farinha, Hugo
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [43] Safety and preliminary efficacy of electrostatic precipitation during pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for unresectable carcinomatosis
    Willaert, W.
    Van de Sande, L.
    Van Daele, E.
    Van De Putte, D.
    Van Nieuwenhove, Y.
    Pattyn, P.
    Ceelen, W.
    EJSO, 2019, 45 (12): : 2302 - 2309
  • [44] Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy PIPAC-OPC2
    Graversen, Martin
    Detlefsen, Sonke
    Asmussen, Jon
    Mahdi, Bassam
    Fristrup, Claus
    Pfeiffer, Per
    Mortensen, Michael Bau
    PLEURA AND PERITONEUM, 2018, 3 (02)
  • [45] Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) as an outpatient procedure
    Graversen, Martin
    Lundell, Lars
    Fristrup, Claus
    Pfeiffer, Per
    Mortensen, Michael B.
    PLEURA AND PERITONEUM, 2018, 3 (04)
  • [46] Oncological Outcomes After Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
    Tidadini, Fatah
    Abba, Julio
    Quesada, Jean-Louis
    Trilling, Bertrand
    Bonne, Aline
    Foote, Alison
    Faucheron, Jean-Luc
    Arvieux, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER, 2023, 54 (02) : 632 - 641
  • [47] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal metastases of pancreas and biliary tract cancer
    Horvath, Philipp
    Beckert, Stefan
    Struller, Florian
    Koenigsrainer, Alfred
    Reymond, Marc Andre
    CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL METASTASIS, 2018, 35 (07) : 635 - 640
  • [48] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal metastases of pancreas and biliary tract cancer
    Philipp Horvath
    Stefan Beckert
    Florian Struller
    Alfred Königsrainer
    Marc André Reymond
    Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 2018, 35 : 635 - 640
  • [49] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in association with systemic chemotherapy and bevacizumab, evaluation of safety and feasibility. A single center comparative study
    Siebert, Matthieu
    Alyami, Mohammad
    Mercier, Frederic
    Gallice, Colin
    Villeneuve, Laurent
    Laplace, Nathalie
    Passot, Guillaume
    Bakrin, Naoual
    Glehen, Olivier
    Kepenekian, Vahan
    EJSO, 2021, 47 (01): : 139 - 142
  • [50] Efficacy and safety of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in ovarian cancer: a systematic review of current evidence
    Pavone, Matteo
    Jochum, Floriane
    Lecointre, Lise
    Bizzarri, Nicolo
    Taliento, Cristina
    Restaino, Stefano
    Vizzielli, Giuseppe
    Fagotti, Anna
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Querleu, Denis
    Akladios, Cherif
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 310 (04) : 1845 - 1856