Efficacy and safety of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in ovarian cancer: a systematic review of current evidence

被引:1
|
作者
Pavone, Matteo [1 ,2 ]
Jochum, Floriane [3 ]
Lecointre, Lise [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Bizzarri, Nicolo [2 ]
Taliento, Cristina [5 ,6 ]
Restaino, Stefano [7 ]
Vizzielli, Giuseppe [7 ,8 ]
Fagotti, Anna [2 ]
Scambia, Giovanni [2 ]
Querleu, Denis [1 ,2 ]
Akladios, Cherif [3 ]
机构
[1] IHU Strasbourg, Inst Image Guided Surg, 1 Pl Hop, F-67091 Strasbourg, France
[2] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna & Bambino & Sanita P, UOC Ginecol Oncol, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp Strasbourg, Dept Gynecol Surg, Strasbourg, France
[4] Univ Strasbourg, UMR 7357, Lab Sci Ingenieur Informat & Imagerie, ICube, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
[5] Univ Hosp Ferrara, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ferrara, Italy
[6] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[7] Azienda Sanit Univ Friuli Cent, Santa Maria Della Misericordia Univ Hosp, Clin Obstet & Gynecol, Udine, Italy
[8] Univ Udine, Dept Med, Udine, Italy
关键词
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy; PIPAC; Ovarian cancer; Peritoneal carcinomatosis; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PERITONEAL METASTASIS; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; SURVIVAL; DOXORUBICIN; SURGERY; TRIALS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-024-07586-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background PIPAC is a recent approach for intraperitoneal chemotherapy with promising results for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. A systematic review was conducted to assess current evidence on the efficacy and outcomes of PIPAC in patients affected by ovarian cancer.Methods The study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to December 2023. Studies reporting data on patients with OC treated with PIPAC were included in the qualitative analysis.Results Twenty-one studies and six clinical trials with 932 patients who underwent PIPAC treatment were identified. The reported first access failure was 4.9%. 89.8% of patients underwent one, 60.7% two and 40% received three or more PIPAC cycles. Pathological tumour response was objectivated in 13 studies. Intra-operative complications were reported in 11% of women and post-operative events in 11.5% with a 0.82% of procedure-related mortality. Quality of life scores have been consistently stable or improved during the treatment time. The percentage of OC patients who became amenable for cytoreductive surgery due to the good response after PIPAC treatment for palliative purposes is reported to be 2.3%.Conclusion The results showed that PIPAC is safe and effective for palliative purposes, with a good pathological tumour response and quality of life. Future prospective studies would be needed to explore the role of this treatment in different stages of the disease, investigating a paradigm shift towards the use of PIPAC with curative intent for women who are not eligible for primary cytoreductive surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1845 / 1856
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) with cisplatin and doxorubicin in patients with ovarian cancer: A systematic review
    Taliento, Cristina
    Restaino, Stefano
    Scutiero, Gennaro
    Arcieri, Martina
    Bernardi, Giulia
    Martinello, Ruby
    Driul, Lorenza
    Perrone, Anna Myriam
    Fagotti, Anna
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Greco, Pantaleo
    Vizzielli, Giuseppe
    EJSO, 2023, 49 (12):
  • [2] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis: systematic review of clinical and experimental evidence with special emphasis on ovarian cancer
    Clemens Tempfer
    Urs Giger-Pabst
    Ziad Hilal
    Askin Dogan
    Günther A. Rezniczek
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2018, 298 : 243 - 257
  • [3] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis: systematic review of clinical and experimental evidence with special emphasis on ovarian cancer
    Tempfer, Clemens
    Giger-Pabst, Urs
    Hilal, Ziad
    Dogan, Askin
    Rezniczek, Guenther A.
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2018, 298 (02) : 243 - 257
  • [4] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. A review of the literature
    Psomiadou, Victoria
    Fotiou, Alexandros
    Prodromidou, Anastasia
    Iavazzo, Christos
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 43 (01) : 73 - 77
  • [5] Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer: Feasibility, Efficacy and Safety-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ramalho-Vasconcelos, Francisca
    Gomes, Raquel
    Bouca-Machado, Raquel
    Aral, Marisa
    Nogueiro, Jorge
    Bouca-Machado, Tiago
    Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo
    Santos-Sousa, Hugo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (11)
  • [6] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Erik, Brecelj
    Katja, Kopriva Pirtovsek
    Jani, Izlakar
    Nina, Boc
    ONKOLOGIJA, 2019, 23 (02) : 38 - 41
  • [7] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): updated systematic review using the IDEAL framework
    Baggaley, Alice E.
    Lafaurie, Guillaume B. R. C.
    Tate, Sophia J.
    Boshier, Piers R.
    Case, Amy
    Prosser, Susan
    Torkington, Jared
    Jones, Sadie E. F.
    Gwynne, Sarah H.
    Peters, Christopher J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 110 (01) : 10 - 18
  • [8] Environmental safety during the administration of Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Graversen, Martin
    Pedersen, Peter B.
    Mortensen, Michael B.
    PLEURA AND PERITONEUM, 2016, 1 (04) : 203 - 208
  • [9] Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): Occupational Health and Safety Aspects
    Solass, Wiebke
    Giger-Pabst, Urs
    Zieren, Juergen
    Reymond, Marc A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (11) : 3504 - 3511
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in women with recurrent gynaecological cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis.
    Reymond, Marc A.
    Solass, Wiebke
    Giger-Pabst, Urs
    Strumberg, Dirk
    Zieren, Jurgen
    Tempfer, Clemens
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)