Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus current treatment continuation for maintenance therapy of HIV-1 infection: the KALESOLO trial

被引:45
|
作者
Meynard, Jean-Luc [1 ]
Bouteloup, Vincent [2 ]
Landman, Roland [3 ]
Bonnard, Philippe [4 ]
Baillat, Vincent [5 ]
Cabie, Andre [6 ]
Kolta, Sami [7 ]
Izopet, Jacques [8 ,9 ]
Taburet, Anne-Marie [10 ]
Mercie, Patrick [11 ]
Chene, Genevieve [2 ]
Girard, Pierre-Marie [1 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Hop St Antoine, Serv Malad Infect, Fac Med Pierre & Marie Curie, F-75012 Paris, France
[2] Univ Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, ISPED, INSERM U897, Bordeaux, France
[3] Fac Bichat Claude Bernard, IMEA, Paris, France
[4] Hop Tenon, Serv Malad Infect, Fac Med Pierre & Marie Curie, F-75970 Paris, France
[5] Hop Gui de Chauliac, Serv Malad Infect, Montpellier, France
[6] Hop Zobda Quitman, Serv Malad Infect, Fort De France, France
[7] Univ Paris 05, Hop Cochin, Serv Rhumatol, Paris, France
[8] CHU Toulouse, Hop Purpan, INSERM U563, Toulouse, France
[9] CHU Toulouse, Hop Purpan, Serv Virol, Toulouse, France
[10] Hop Bicetre, Serv Pharm, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[11] Univ Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Hop St Andre, Serv Med Interne, Bordeaux, France
[12] INSERM, UMR S707, Paris, France
关键词
treatment simplification; protease inhibitor monotherapy; maintenance therapy; lipodystrophy; LOPINAVIR-RITONAVIR MONOTHERAPY; VIRAL SUPPRESSION; 2; NUCLEOSIDES; PILOT TRIAL; OPEN-LABEL; LAMIVUDINE; ATAZANAVIR; NELFINAVIR; ZIDOVUDINE; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dkq327
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
We evaluated a monotherapy maintenance regimen with lopinavir/ritonavir versus continuing current combined antiretroviral treatment (cART) in HIV patients with suppressed plasma HIV-1 RNA. This was an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre trial in 23 sites in France. Adults were randomized if they had no history of virological failure while receiving a protease inhibitor, maintained HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL for at least 6 months and did not change cART during the last 3 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 (non-inferiority margin set at -12%) with missing data and treatment modification considered as failure. The trial has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT00140751. At Week 48, 84% (73/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group met the primary endpoint compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group [difference, -4.0%, lower limit of 90% two-sided confidence interval (CI) for difference, -12.4%]. In secondary analysis with success defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL, 87% (76/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group were virologically suppressed compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group (difference, -0.5%, lower limit of 90% two-sided CI for difference, -8.5%). If antiretroviral treatment intensification was taken into account, 91% (79/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group met the primary endpoint compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group (difference, +2.9%, lower limit of 90% two-sided CI for difference, -4.5%). Failures of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy did not show acquired resistance mutations in the protease gene. Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy did not achieve non-inferiority versus cART for maintaining plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL. Nevertheless, the incidence of virological failure was low (mostly with HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL) and easily managed by treatment intensification.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:2436 / 2444
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-Utility Analysis of Lopinavir/Ritonavir versus Atazanavir plus Ritonavir Administered as First-Line Therapy for the Treatment of HIV Infection in Italy: From Randomised Trial to Real World
    Foglia, Emanuela
    Bonfanti, Paolo
    Rizzardini, Giuliano
    Bonizzoni, Erminio
    Restelli, Umberto
    Ricci, Elena
    Porazzi, Emanuele
    Scolari, Francesca
    Croce, Davide
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (02):
  • [32] Dual therapy with lopinavir and ritonavir plus lamivudine versus triple therapy with lopinavir and ritonavir plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in antiretroviraltherapy-naive adults with HIV-1 infection: 48 week results of the randomised, open label, non-inferiority GARDEL trial
    Cahn, Pedro
    Andrade-Villanueva, Jaime
    Arribas, Jose R.
    Gatell, Jose M.
    Lama, Jiavier R.
    Norton, Michael
    Patterson, Patricia
    Sierra Madero, Juan
    Sued, Omar
    Ines Figueroa, Maria
    Jose Rolon, Maria
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 14 (07): : 572 - 580
  • [33] Atazanavir/ritonavir-based combination antiretroviral therapy for treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults
    Achenbach, Chad J.
    Darin, Kristin M.
    Murphy, Robert L.
    Katlama, Christine
    FUTURE VIROLOGY, 2011, 6 (02) : 157 - 177
  • [34] High quality of life, treatment tolerability, safety and efficacy in HIV patients switching from triple therapy to lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy: A randomized clinical trial
    Pasquau, Juan
    Hidalgo-Tenorio, Carmen
    Luisa Montes, Maria
    Romero-Palacios, Alberto
    Vergas, Jorge
    Sanjoaquin, Isabel
    Hernandez-Quero, Jose
    Aguirrebengoa, Koldo
    Orihuela, Francisco
    Imaz, Arkaitz
    Jose Rios-Villegas, Maria
    Flores, Juan
    Carmen Farinas, Maria
    Vazquez, Pilar
    Jose Galindo, Maria
    Garcia-Merce, Isabel
    Lozano, Fernando
    de los Santos, Ignacio
    Elizabeth de Jesus, Samantha
    Garcia-Vallecillos, Coral
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (04):
  • [35] Current approaches to treatment for HIV-1 infection
    Powderly, WG
    JOURNAL OF NEUROVIROLOGY, 2000, 6 : S8 - S13
  • [36] Dual treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir plus lamivudine versus triple treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine and a second nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor for maintenance of HIV-1 viral suppression (OLE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial
    Arribas, Jose R.
    Girard, Pierre-Marie
    Landman, Roland
    Pich, Judit
    Mallolas, Josep
    Martinez-Rebollar, Maria
    Zamora, Francisco X.
    Estrada, Vicente
    Crespo, Manuel
    Podzamczer, Daniel
    Portilla, Joaquin
    Dronda, Fernando
    Iribarren, Jose A.
    Domingo, Pere
    Pulido, Federico
    Montero, Marta
    Knobel, Hernando
    Cabie, Andre
    Weiss, Laurence
    Gatell, Jose M.
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 15 (07): : 785 - 792
  • [37] Impact of 48 week lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy on blood cell-associated HIV-1-DNA in the MONARK trial
    Avettand-Fenoel, Veronique
    Flandre, Philippe
    Chaix, Marie-Laure
    Ghosn, Jade
    Delaugerre, Constance
    Raffi, Francois
    NgoVan, Philippe
    Cohen-Codar, Isabelle
    Delfraissy, Jean-Francois
    Rouzioux, Christine
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2010, 65 (05) : 1005 - 1007
  • [38] Cost effectiveness of using lopinavir/ritonavir versus nelfinavir as the first highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen for HIV infection
    Simpson, KN
    Chumney, E
    Luo, MP
    Bernstein, B
    Sun, E
    Ashraf, T
    ANTIVIRAL THERAPY, 2002, 7 (03) : L77 - L77
  • [39] Intensification with efavirenz or lopinavir/ritonavir does not reduce residual HIV-1 viraemia in patients on standard antiretroviral therapy
    Maldarelli, F.
    Wiegand, A.
    Palmer, S.
    Urban, N.
    Kearney, M.
    Coffin, J.
    Mellors, J.
    ANTIVIRAL THERAPY, 2008, 13 (04) : A79 - A79
  • [40] Abacavir/Lamivudine versus Tenofovir/Emtricitabine with Atazanavir/Ritonavir for Treatment-naive Japanese Patients with HIV-1 Infection: A Randomized Multicenter Trial
    Nishijima, Takeshi
    Takano, Misao
    Ishisaka, Michiyo
    Komatsu, Hirokazu
    Gatanaga, Hiroyuki
    Kikuchi, Yoshimi
    Endo, Tomoyuki
    Horiba, Masahide
    Kaneda, Satoru
    Uchiumi, Hideki
    Koibuchi, Tomohiko
    Naito, Toshio
    Yoshida, Masaki
    Tachikawa, Natsuo
    Ueda, Mikio
    Yokomaku, Yoshiyuki
    Fujii, Teruhisa
    Higasa, Satoshi
    Takada, Kiyonori
    Yamamoto, Masahiro
    Matsushita, Shuzo
    Tateyama, Masao
    Tanabe, Yoshinari
    Mitsuya, Hiroaki
    Oka, Shinichi
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 52 (07) : 735 - 744