Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus current treatment continuation for maintenance therapy of HIV-1 infection: the KALESOLO trial

被引:45
|
作者
Meynard, Jean-Luc [1 ]
Bouteloup, Vincent [2 ]
Landman, Roland [3 ]
Bonnard, Philippe [4 ]
Baillat, Vincent [5 ]
Cabie, Andre [6 ]
Kolta, Sami [7 ]
Izopet, Jacques [8 ,9 ]
Taburet, Anne-Marie [10 ]
Mercie, Patrick [11 ]
Chene, Genevieve [2 ]
Girard, Pierre-Marie [1 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Hop St Antoine, Serv Malad Infect, Fac Med Pierre & Marie Curie, F-75012 Paris, France
[2] Univ Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, ISPED, INSERM U897, Bordeaux, France
[3] Fac Bichat Claude Bernard, IMEA, Paris, France
[4] Hop Tenon, Serv Malad Infect, Fac Med Pierre & Marie Curie, F-75970 Paris, France
[5] Hop Gui de Chauliac, Serv Malad Infect, Montpellier, France
[6] Hop Zobda Quitman, Serv Malad Infect, Fort De France, France
[7] Univ Paris 05, Hop Cochin, Serv Rhumatol, Paris, France
[8] CHU Toulouse, Hop Purpan, INSERM U563, Toulouse, France
[9] CHU Toulouse, Hop Purpan, Serv Virol, Toulouse, France
[10] Hop Bicetre, Serv Pharm, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[11] Univ Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Hop St Andre, Serv Med Interne, Bordeaux, France
[12] INSERM, UMR S707, Paris, France
关键词
treatment simplification; protease inhibitor monotherapy; maintenance therapy; lipodystrophy; LOPINAVIR-RITONAVIR MONOTHERAPY; VIRAL SUPPRESSION; 2; NUCLEOSIDES; PILOT TRIAL; OPEN-LABEL; LAMIVUDINE; ATAZANAVIR; NELFINAVIR; ZIDOVUDINE; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dkq327
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
We evaluated a monotherapy maintenance regimen with lopinavir/ritonavir versus continuing current combined antiretroviral treatment (cART) in HIV patients with suppressed plasma HIV-1 RNA. This was an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre trial in 23 sites in France. Adults were randomized if they had no history of virological failure while receiving a protease inhibitor, maintained HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL for at least 6 months and did not change cART during the last 3 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 (non-inferiority margin set at -12%) with missing data and treatment modification considered as failure. The trial has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT00140751. At Week 48, 84% (73/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group met the primary endpoint compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group [difference, -4.0%, lower limit of 90% two-sided confidence interval (CI) for difference, -12.4%]. In secondary analysis with success defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL, 87% (76/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group were virologically suppressed compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group (difference, -0.5%, lower limit of 90% two-sided CI for difference, -8.5%). If antiretroviral treatment intensification was taken into account, 91% (79/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group met the primary endpoint compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group (difference, +2.9%, lower limit of 90% two-sided CI for difference, -4.5%). Failures of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy did not show acquired resistance mutations in the protease gene. Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy did not achieve non-inferiority versus cART for maintaining plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL. Nevertheless, the incidence of virological failure was low (mostly with HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL) and easily managed by treatment intensification.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:2436 / 2444
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Monotherapy with Lopinavir/Ritonavir as Maintenance After HIV-1 Viral Suppression: Results of a 96-Week Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label, Pilot Trial (KalMo Study)
    Nunes, Estevao P.
    de Oliveira, Marilia Santini
    Mercon, Monica
    Zajdenverg, Roberto
    Faulhaber, Jose Claudio
    Pilotto, Jose Henrique
    Ribeiro, Jorge Eurico
    Norton, Michael
    Schechter, Mauro
    HIV CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 10 (06): : 368 - 374
  • [22] Lopinavir/ritonavir maintenance monotherapy after successful viral suppression with standard highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients
    Campo, RE
    Lalanne, R
    Tanner, TJ
    Jayaweera, DT
    Rodriguez, AE
    Fontaine, L
    Kolber, MA
    AIDS, 2005, 19 (04) : 447 - 449
  • [23] Assessing treatment pattern and cost consequence of lopinavir/ritonavir versus nelfinavir therapy in HIV patients
    Luo, MP
    Boggs, R
    Bernstein, B
    Sun, E
    Ashraf, T
    ANTIVIRAL THERAPY, 2002, 7 (03) : L75 - L76
  • [24] A randomized trial to evaluate lopinavir/ritonavir versus saquinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1-infected patients: the MaxCmin2 trial
    Dragsted, UB
    Gerstoft, J
    Youle, M
    Fox, Z
    Losso, M
    Benetucci, J
    Jayaweera, DT
    Rieger, A
    Bruun, JN
    Castagna, A
    Gazzard, B
    Walmsley, S
    Hill, A
    Lundgren, JD
    ANTIVIRAL THERAPY, 2005, 10 (06) : 735 - 743
  • [25] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy Versus Standard Combination Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-1 Infected Patients with Viral Suppression in France (ANRS 140 DREAM)
    Osvaldo Ulises Garay
    Marie Libérée Nishimwe
    Marwân-al-Qays Bousmah
    Asmaa Janah
    Pierre-Marie Girard
    Geneviève Chêne
    Laetitia Moinot
    Luis Sagaon-Teyssier
    Jean-Luc Meynard
    Bruno Spire
    Sylvie Boyer
    PharmacoEconomics - Open, 2019, 3 : 505 - 515
  • [26] HIV Viral Dynamics of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy as Second-Line Treatment: A Prospective, Single-Arm Trial
    Claassen, Cassidy W.
    Keckich, David
    Nwizu, Chidi
    Abimiku, Alash'le
    Salami, Donald
    Obiefune, Michael
    Gilliam, Bruce L.
    Amoroso, Anthony
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PROVIDERS OF AIDS CARE, 2019, 18
  • [27] Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy as maintenance treatment in HIV-infected individuals with virological suppression: results from a pilot study in Brazil
    Sprinz, E.
    Bay, M. B.
    Lazzaretti, R. K.
    Jeffman, M. W.
    Mattevi, V. S.
    HIV MEDICINE, 2008, 9 (05) : 270 - 276
  • [28] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy Versus Standard Combination Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-1 Infected Patients with Viral Suppression in France (ANRS 140 DREAM)
    Garay, Osvaldo Ulises
    Nishimwe, Marie Liberee
    Bousmah, Marwan-al-Qays
    Janah, Asmaa
    Girard, Pierre-Marie
    Chene, Genevieve
    Moinot, Laetitia
    Sagaon-Teyssier, Luis
    Meynard, Jean-Luc
    Spire, Bruno
    Boyer, Sylvie
    PHARMACOECONOMICS-OPEN, 2019, 3 (04) : 505 - 515
  • [29] Residual HIV-1 replication may impact immune recovery in patients on first-line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy
    Tran, Tu-Anh
    Ghosn, Jade
    Avettand-Fenoel, Veronique
    Hendel-Chavez, Houria
    de Herve, Marie-Ghislaine de Goer
    Cohen-Codar, Isabelle
    Rouzioux, Christine
    Delfraissy, Jean-Francois
    Taoufik, Yassine
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 70 (09) : 2627 - 2631
  • [30] Ritonavir boosted indinavir treatment as a simplified maintenance 'mono'-therapy for HIV infection
    Kahlert, C
    Hupfer, M
    Wagels, T
    Bueche, D
    Fierz, W
    Walker, UA
    Vernazza, PL
    AIDS, 2004, 18 (06) : 955 - 957