Giant panda habitat networks and conservation: is this species adequately protected?

被引:12
|
作者
Gong, M. [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Z. [3 ]
Yang, W. [1 ]
Song, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Zool, Key Lab Anim Ecol & Conservat Biol, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] State Forestry Adm, Acad Forest Inventory & Planning, Wildlife Monitoring Ctr, Beijing 100714, Peoples R China
[3] China W Normal Univ, Inst Rare Anim & Plants, Nanchong 637002, Peoples R China
关键词
carrying capacity; giant panda; habitat suitability; reserve network; LANDSCAPES; MOUNTAINS; CHINA;
D O I
10.1071/WR10038
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context. Giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) are restricted to six mountain ranges at the edge of the Tibetan Plateau. One of these ranges, the Qinling Mountains, contains the highest density of giant pandas and is home to similar to 20% of those remaining in the wild. Commercial logging and other developments have resulted in habitat fragmentation, and an efficient and powerful conservation network is now needed for the species in this area. Aims. This study sought to assess giant panda habitat and estimate the carrying capacity of this reserve network. Our goal was to improve the function and carrying capacity of the reserve network and facilitate population growth and gene flow among subpopulations of giant pandas. Methods. We use habitat suitability models to assess the efficacy of conservation networks. With estimation of carrying capacity by home range, we can reveal issues facing reserves and populations of endangered species they contain. Here, we define key habitat, linkages, corridors and overall connectivity and then use habitat network modelling and spatial analyses to design a conservation landscape for giant pandas across their Qinling Mountains stronghold. Key results. We found that 91% of giant panda sightings were in suitable or marginally suitable habitat. The total area of giant panda habitat present in the Qinling Mountains is similar to 1600 km(2) fragmented across four key habitat blocks by national roads or other human activity. The current nature reserve network encompasses 71% of available suitable habitat and 62% of available marginal habitat, meaning a significant proportion of panda habitat remains outside the current conservation network. We found that giant panda reserves across this region are not equal in their carrying capacity; some reserves contain an overabundance of giant pandas and the wellbeing of these populations are in doubt. Conclusions. Our results highlight the potential risk of high densities and bamboo flowering events to the safety of giant pandas. With poor population size and heavy isolation, small populations will not persist without translocation. Implication. Redrawing the reserve network to correct localised problems may improve the function of the giant panda protection system, build capacity in the reserve network, and decrease human-wildlife conflict. We propose a new reserve and adjustment of the borders and region for three reserves.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 538
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Climate change-induced decline in bamboo habitats and species diversity: implications for giant panda conservation
    Li, Renqiang
    Xu, Ming
    Wong, Michelle Hang Gi
    Qiu, Shuai
    Sheng, Qingkai
    Li, Xinhai
    Song, Zengming
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2015, 21 (04) : 379 - 391
  • [42] Environmental drivers of sympatric mammalian species compositional turnover in giant panda nature reserves: Implications for conservation
    Wen, Zhixin
    Cai, Tianlong
    Wu, Yongjie
    Fejio, Anderson
    Xia, Lin
    Cheng, Jilong
    Peng, Xingwen
    Zhang, Qian
    Zhang, Zejun
    Ran, Jianghong
    Ge, Deyan
    Yang, Qisen
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 806
  • [43] Reassessing the conservation status of the giant panda using remote sensing
    Xu, Weihua
    Vina, Andres
    Kong, Lingqiao
    Pimm, Stuart L.
    Zhang, Jingjing
    Yang, Wu
    Xiao, Yi
    Zhang, Lu
    Chen, Xiaodong
    Liu, Jianguo
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2017, 1 (11): : 1635 - 1638
  • [44] Do revised giant panda population estimates aid in their conservation?
    Garshelis, David L.
    Wang Hao
    Wang Dajun
    Zhu Xiaojian
    Li Sheng
    McShea, William J.
    URSUS, 2008, 19 (02) : 168 - 176
  • [45] Climate change challenges the current conservation strategy for the giant panda
    Shen, Guozhen
    Pimm, Stuart L.
    Feng, Chaoyang
    Ren, Guofang
    Liu, Yanping
    Xu, Wenting
    Li, Junqing
    Si, Xingfeng
    Xie, Zongqiang
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 190 : 43 - 50
  • [46] Reassessing the conservation status of the giant panda using remote sensing
    Weihua Xu
    Andrés Viña
    Lingqiao Kong
    Stuart L. Pimm
    Jingjing Zhang
    Wu Yang
    Yi Xiao
    Lu Zhang
    Xiaodong Chen
    Jianguo Liu
    Zhiyun Ouyang
    Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2017, 1 : 1635 - 1638
  • [47] Species-habitat networks: A tool to improve landscape management for conservation
    Marini, Lorenzo
    Bartomeus, Ignasi
    Rader, Romina
    Lami, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2019, 56 (04) : 923 - 928
  • [48] Natural recovery and restoration in giant panda habitat after the Wenchuan earthquake
    Zhang, Jindong
    Hull, Vanessa
    Huang, Jinyan
    Yang, Wu
    Zhou, Shiqiang
    Xu, Weihua
    Huang, Yan
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    Zhang, Hemin
    Liu, Jianguo
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 319 : 1 - 9
  • [49] Effects of fuelwood collection and timber harvesting on giant panda habitat use
    Bearer, Scott
    Linderman, Marc
    Huang, Jinyan
    An, Li
    He, Guangming
    Liu, Jianquo
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2008, 141 (02) : 385 - 393
  • [50] An ecophysiological perspective on likely giant panda habitat responses to climate change
    Zhang, Yuke
    Mathewson, Paul D.
    Zhang, Qiongyue
    Porter, Warren P.
    Ran, Jianghong
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2018, 24 (04) : 1804 - 1816