Giant panda habitat networks and conservation: is this species adequately protected?

被引:12
|
作者
Gong, M. [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Z. [3 ]
Yang, W. [1 ]
Song, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Zool, Key Lab Anim Ecol & Conservat Biol, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] State Forestry Adm, Acad Forest Inventory & Planning, Wildlife Monitoring Ctr, Beijing 100714, Peoples R China
[3] China W Normal Univ, Inst Rare Anim & Plants, Nanchong 637002, Peoples R China
关键词
carrying capacity; giant panda; habitat suitability; reserve network; LANDSCAPES; MOUNTAINS; CHINA;
D O I
10.1071/WR10038
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context. Giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) are restricted to six mountain ranges at the edge of the Tibetan Plateau. One of these ranges, the Qinling Mountains, contains the highest density of giant pandas and is home to similar to 20% of those remaining in the wild. Commercial logging and other developments have resulted in habitat fragmentation, and an efficient and powerful conservation network is now needed for the species in this area. Aims. This study sought to assess giant panda habitat and estimate the carrying capacity of this reserve network. Our goal was to improve the function and carrying capacity of the reserve network and facilitate population growth and gene flow among subpopulations of giant pandas. Methods. We use habitat suitability models to assess the efficacy of conservation networks. With estimation of carrying capacity by home range, we can reveal issues facing reserves and populations of endangered species they contain. Here, we define key habitat, linkages, corridors and overall connectivity and then use habitat network modelling and spatial analyses to design a conservation landscape for giant pandas across their Qinling Mountains stronghold. Key results. We found that 91% of giant panda sightings were in suitable or marginally suitable habitat. The total area of giant panda habitat present in the Qinling Mountains is similar to 1600 km(2) fragmented across four key habitat blocks by national roads or other human activity. The current nature reserve network encompasses 71% of available suitable habitat and 62% of available marginal habitat, meaning a significant proportion of panda habitat remains outside the current conservation network. We found that giant panda reserves across this region are not equal in their carrying capacity; some reserves contain an overabundance of giant pandas and the wellbeing of these populations are in doubt. Conclusions. Our results highlight the potential risk of high densities and bamboo flowering events to the safety of giant pandas. With poor population size and heavy isolation, small populations will not persist without translocation. Implication. Redrawing the reserve network to correct localised problems may improve the function of the giant panda protection system, build capacity in the reserve network, and decrease human-wildlife conflict. We propose a new reserve and adjustment of the borders and region for three reserves.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 538
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Lushan earthquake and the giant panda: impacts and conservation
    Zhang, Zejun
    Yuan, Shibin
    Qi, Dunwu
    Zhang, Mingchun
    INTEGRATIVE ZOOLOGY, 2014, 9 (03): : 376 - 378
  • [22] The role of den quality in giant panda conservation
    Wei, Wei
    Swaisgood, Ronald R.
    Owen, Megan A.
    Pilfold, Nicholas W.
    Han, Han
    Hong, Mingsheng
    Zhou, Hong
    Wei, Fuwen
    Nie, Yonggang
    Zhang, Zejun
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 231 : 189 - 196
  • [23] Wildlife conservation - Giant panda numbers are surging - or are they?
    Guo, Jerry
    SCIENCE, 2007, 316 (5827) : 974 - 975
  • [24] Giant panda intestinal microbes: Biofuels and conservation
    Williams, Candace
    Johnston, Ian
    Kouba, Andy
    Willard, Scott
    Sparks, Darrell
    Brown, Ashli
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 244
  • [25] The Protected Area Paradox and refugee species: The giant panda and baselines shifted towards conserving species in marginal habitats
    Kerley, Graham I. H.
    te Beest, Mariska
    Cromsigt, Joris P. G. M.
    Pauly, Daniel
    Shultz, Susanne
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2020, 2 (06)
  • [26] Impact of livestock grazing on biodiversity and giant panda habitat
    Wang, Xiao
    Huang, Jinyan
    Connor, Thomas A.
    Bai, Wenke
    Zhang, Jindong
    Wei, Wei
    Zhang, Zejun
    Liu, Dian
    Zhou, Caiquan
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 83 (07): : 1592 - 1597
  • [27] Restoration of giant panda habitat requires balancing single- and multi-species benefits
    Yang, Biao
    Xu, Yu
    Dai, Qiang
    Pan, Han
    Yang, Zhisong
    Yang, Xuyu
    Gu, Xiaodong
    Ran, Jianghong
    Zhang, Zejun
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2025,
  • [28] Should the Endangered Status of the Giant Panda Really Be Reduced? The Case of Giant Panda Conservation in Sichuan, China
    Ma, Ben
    Lei, Shuo
    Qing, Qin
    Wen, Yali
    ANIMALS, 2018, 8 (05):
  • [29] Evaluating giant panda as a surrogate species for conservation co-occurring species in the Baishuijiang National Nature Reserve
    Rong, Zhanlei
    Liu, Xingming
    Zhao, Chuanyan
    He, Liwen
    Liu, Junjie
    Gao, Yunfei
    Zang, Fei
    Xu, Haojie
    Guo, Zhaoxia
    Mao, Yahua
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (09) : 8939 - 8948
  • [30] The willingness to pay for property rights for the Giant Panda: Can a charismatic species be an instrument for nature conservation?
    Kontoleon, A
    Swanson, T
    LAND ECONOMICS, 2003, 79 (04) : 483 - 499