Giant panda habitat networks and conservation: is this species adequately protected?

被引:12
|
作者
Gong, M. [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Z. [3 ]
Yang, W. [1 ]
Song, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Zool, Key Lab Anim Ecol & Conservat Biol, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] State Forestry Adm, Acad Forest Inventory & Planning, Wildlife Monitoring Ctr, Beijing 100714, Peoples R China
[3] China W Normal Univ, Inst Rare Anim & Plants, Nanchong 637002, Peoples R China
关键词
carrying capacity; giant panda; habitat suitability; reserve network; LANDSCAPES; MOUNTAINS; CHINA;
D O I
10.1071/WR10038
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context. Giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) are restricted to six mountain ranges at the edge of the Tibetan Plateau. One of these ranges, the Qinling Mountains, contains the highest density of giant pandas and is home to similar to 20% of those remaining in the wild. Commercial logging and other developments have resulted in habitat fragmentation, and an efficient and powerful conservation network is now needed for the species in this area. Aims. This study sought to assess giant panda habitat and estimate the carrying capacity of this reserve network. Our goal was to improve the function and carrying capacity of the reserve network and facilitate population growth and gene flow among subpopulations of giant pandas. Methods. We use habitat suitability models to assess the efficacy of conservation networks. With estimation of carrying capacity by home range, we can reveal issues facing reserves and populations of endangered species they contain. Here, we define key habitat, linkages, corridors and overall connectivity and then use habitat network modelling and spatial analyses to design a conservation landscape for giant pandas across their Qinling Mountains stronghold. Key results. We found that 91% of giant panda sightings were in suitable or marginally suitable habitat. The total area of giant panda habitat present in the Qinling Mountains is similar to 1600 km(2) fragmented across four key habitat blocks by national roads or other human activity. The current nature reserve network encompasses 71% of available suitable habitat and 62% of available marginal habitat, meaning a significant proportion of panda habitat remains outside the current conservation network. We found that giant panda reserves across this region are not equal in their carrying capacity; some reserves contain an overabundance of giant pandas and the wellbeing of these populations are in doubt. Conclusions. Our results highlight the potential risk of high densities and bamboo flowering events to the safety of giant pandas. With poor population size and heavy isolation, small populations will not persist without translocation. Implication. Redrawing the reserve network to correct localised problems may improve the function of the giant panda protection system, build capacity in the reserve network, and decrease human-wildlife conflict. We propose a new reserve and adjustment of the borders and region for three reserves.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 538
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measures of Giant Panda Habitat Selection Across Multiple Spatial Scales for Species Conservation
    Qi, Dunwu
    Zhang, Shanning
    Zhang, Zejun
    Hu, Yibo
    Yang, Xuyu
    Wang, Hongjia
    Wei, Fuwen
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 76 (05): : 1092 - 1100
  • [2] Strengthening protected areas for giant panda habitat and ecosystem services
    Zhang, Jingjing
    Xu, Weihua
    Kong, Lingqiao
    Hull, Vanessa
    Xiao, Yi
    Xiao, Yang
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2018, 227 : 1 - 8
  • [3] Implications of habitat overlap between giant panda and sambar for sympatric multi-species conservation
    Bai, Wenke
    Zhang, Jindong
    He, Ke
    Zhao, Shanshan
    Gu, Xiaodong
    Hu, Jie
    Songer, Melissa
    Zhou, Caiquan
    Dong, Xin
    Huang, Qiongyu
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 50 (10) : 820 - 826
  • [4] Spatial coincidence between mining activities and protected areas of giant panda habitat: The geographic overlaps and implications for conservation
    Wanghe, Kunyuan
    Guo, Xinle
    Hu, Faxiang
    Ahmad, Shahid
    Jin, Xiaowen
    Khan, Tauheed Ullah
    Xiao, Yanqing
    Luan, Xiaofeng
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 247
  • [5] Parasites of the Giant Panda: A Risk Factor in the Conservation of a Species
    Wang, Tao
    Xie, Yue
    Zheng, Youle
    Wang, Chengdong
    Li, Desheng
    Koehler, Anson V.
    Gasser, Robin B.
    ADVANCES IN PARASITOLOGY, VOL 99, 2018, 99 : 1 - 33
  • [6] Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Ecological Policy Compromises Human Well-Being and Giant Panda Habitat Conservation in Giant Panda National Park
    Zhu, Dan
    Yang, Degang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (09)
  • [7] A synthesis of giant panda habitat selection
    Hull, Vanessa
    Roloff, Gary
    Zhang, Jindong
    Liu, Wei
    Zhou, Shiqiang
    Huang, Jinyan
    Xu, Weihua
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    Zhang, Hemin
    Liu, Jianguo
    URSUS, 2014, 25 (02) : 148 - 162
  • [8] Habitat use and separation between the giant panda and the red panda
    Wei, FW
    Feng, ZJ
    Wang, ZW
    Hu, JC
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2000, 81 (02) : 448 - 455
  • [9] Modeling the choice to switch from fuelwood to electricity Implications for giant panda habitat conservation
    An, L
    Lupi, F
    Liu, JG
    Linderman, MA
    Huang, JY
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 42 (03) : 445 - 457
  • [10] Effects of conservation policies on forest cover change in giant panda habitat regions, China
    Li, Yu
    Vina, Andres
    Yang, Wu
    Chen, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Jindong
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    Liang, Zai
    Liu, Jianguo
    LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 33 : 42 - 53