Comparison of field and laboratory methods for monitoring metallic mercury vapor in indoor air

被引:11
|
作者
Singhvi, R
Turpin, R
Kalnicky, DJ
Patel, J
机构
[1] US EPA, Environm Response Team Ctr, Edison, NJ 08837 USA
[2] REAC, Environm Serv, Lockheed Martin Technol Serv Grp, Edison, NJ 08837 USA
关键词
mercury; indoor air; field monitoring; laboratory analysis; statistical evaluation;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00334-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Real-time metallic mercury vapor levels of the indoor air were monitored at several mercury spill sites around the US in order to evaluate the effectiveness of site cleanup operations. Mercury readings taken in the field with a Jerome 431 (TM) Mercury Vapor Analyzer were compared with laboratory analysis using a modified National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 6009 method. Statistical evaluation showed that the data were highly comparable except at low concentrations, due to the large degree of uncertainty associated with measuring low levels of mercury with the Jerome analyzer. Regression analysis indicated that Jerome measurements of 10 mug/m(3) or greater are comparable for field analysis of mercury vapor in air. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of sampling methods of indoor air particulate matter for in vitro exposure studies
    Nordberg, Maria-Elisa
    Taubel, Martin
    Jalkanen, Kaisa
    Hyvarinen, Anne
    Huttunen, Kati
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2017, 50
  • [32] Monitoring of lead, arsenic and mercury in the indoor air and settled dust in the Natural History Museum of Rouen (France)
    Marcotte, Stephane
    Estel, Lionel
    Minchin, Sebastien
    Leboucher, Sandra
    Le Meur, Sebastien
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 8 (03) : 483 - 489
  • [33] A COMPARISON OF FIELD AND LABORATORY METHODS FOR DETERMINING CONTAMINANT FLOW PARAMETERS
    TAYLOR, SR
    MOLTYANER, GL
    HOWARD, KWF
    KILLEY, RWD
    GROUND WATER, 1987, 25 (03) : 321 - 330
  • [34] Measuring earplug noise attenuation: A comparison of laboratory and field methods
    Karch, Stephanie J.
    Federman, Jeremy
    Ginsberg, Joshua T.
    Qureshi, Iram
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE, 2024, 21 (01) : 68 - 76
  • [35] A COMPARISON OF LABORATORY AND FIELD INSPECTION METHODS TO MONITOR SHEEP LICE
    WISE, GA
    WOOL TECHNOLOGY AND SHEEP BREEDING, 1988, 35 (04): : 201 - 203
  • [36] A comparison of field and laboratory analytical methods for radon site investigation
    Talbot, DK
    Appleton, JD
    Ball, TK
    Strutt, MH
    JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION, 1998, 65 (01) : 79 - 90
  • [37] Analysis of benzene air quality standards, monitoring methods and concentrations in indoor and outdoor environment
    Sekar, Abinaya
    Varghese, George K.
    Varma, M. K. Ravi
    HELIYON, 2019, 5 (11)
  • [38] COMPARISON OF STANDARD METHODS OF CALCULATING ATTENUATION OF SOUND IN AIR WITH LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS
    PIERCY, JE
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1972, 51 (01): : 156 - &
  • [39] Comparison of numerical methods in near-field computation for metallic nanoparticles
    Karamehmedovic, Mirza
    Schuh, Roman
    Schmidt, Vladimir
    Wriedt, Thomas
    Matyssek, Christian
    Hergert, Wolfram
    Stalmashonak, Andrei
    Seifert, Gerhard
    Stranik, Ondrej
    OPTICS EXPRESS, 2011, 19 (09): : 8939 - 8953
  • [40] A COMPARISON OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY METHODS IN MONITORING HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN THERAPY
    MARRS, RP
    MARCH, CM
    MISHELL, DR
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1980, 34 (03) : 299 - 299