The accurate estimation of GPR migration velocity and comparison Chock for of imaging methods

被引:15
|
作者
Cui, Fan [1 ,2 ]
Li, Siyuan [3 ]
Wang, Libing [4 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol Beijing, State Key Lab Coal Resources & Safe Min, D11 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Key Lab Precise Min Intergrown Energy & R, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Min Technol Beijing, Coll Geosci & Surveying Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Earth Sci, Beijing 101407, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Ground penetrating radar; Migration velocity; Cross-correlation analysis; Least square fitting; Migration algorithms; Radius inversion; GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR; CROSS-CORRELATION; WAVE; UNCERTAINTIES; UTILITIES; OBJECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.09.038
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In order to improve the resolution of GPR profiles from the perspective of data processing, the migration technique is applied to forward and measured GPR profiles. Given the shortcomings of the conventional GPR migration velocity determination method, such as strong randomness, uncontrollable error and massive consumption of workforce and material resources, therefore, a new method for determining GPR migration velocity based on cross-correlation analysis and least square fitting has been proposed. According to the determined velocity, three migration algorithms (Kirchhoff, F-K and finite difference) can be used to process the forward and measured GPR profiles (pipes detection), the migration effect evaluated from image display, the information entropy, the operational efficiency and the accuracy of the determined velocity also reflected from migration results. At the same time, the radius inversion is realized under the coordinate points picked up by the cross-correlation analysis and fitted equations. In addition, a series of studies show that the migration velocity determined by the method proposed in this paper can be used not only to migrate GPR profiles, but to converge the hyperbola in profiles completely, which indicates the velocity is relatively accurate. By analyzing the effect of the GPR profiles migrated by three algorithms, it can be found that the F-K algorithm has a strong applicability to the forward and measured profiles of GPR and that the radius inversion errors of forward and measured profiles can be controlled below 6% and 12% respectively. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 585
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparison of EM induction and GPR methods in areas of karst
    Doolittle, JA
    Collins, ME
    GEODERMA, 1998, 85 (01) : 83 - 102
  • [42] Pushing the limits of seismic imaging .2. Integration of prestack migration, velocity estimation, and AVO analysis
    Berkhout, AJ
    GEOPHYSICS, 1997, 62 (03) : 954 - 969
  • [43] Application of GPR reverse time migration in tunnel lining cavity imaging
    Yu-zeng Lv
    Hong-hua Wang
    Jun-bo Gong
    Applied Geophysics, 2020, 17 : 277 - 284
  • [44] Joint imaging of angle-dependent reflectivity and estimation of the migration velocity model using multiple scattering
    Davydenko, Mikhail
    Verschuur, D. J.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 84 (06) : R859 - R868
  • [45] Hand-Held GPR Imaging Using Migration for Irregular Data
    Feng, Xuan
    Sato, Motoyuki
    Liu, Cai
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 4 (04) : 799 - 803
  • [46] Application of GPR reverse time migration in tunnel lining cavity imaging
    Lv, Yu-zeng
    Wang, Hong-hua
    Gong, Jun-bo
    APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 17 (02) : 277 - 284
  • [47] GPR scanning methods for enhanced data imaging in wooden logs
    Pyakurel, Sandeep
    Halabe, Udaya B.
    REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, VOL 27A AND 27B, 2008, 975 : 1674 - 1681
  • [48] Accurate estimation of vertebral fracture prevalence on lateral spine imaging requires use of validated ascertainment methods
    J. T. Schousboe
    N. Binkley
    W. D. Leslie
    Osteoporosis International, 2022, 33 : 1181 - 1182
  • [49] P8.6 Comparison of Transit Time Estimation Methods for the Determination of Pulse Wave Velocity
    M. Bachler
    B. Hametner
    C. Mayer
    T. Weber
    B. Eber
    S. Wassertheurer
    Artery Research, 2014, 8 (4) : 152 - 152
  • [50] A comprehensive comparison between the refraction microtremor and seismic interferometry methods for phase-velocity estimation
    Xu, Zongbo
    Mikesell, T. Dylan
    Xia, Jianghai
    Cheng, Feng
    GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 82 (06) : EN99 - EN108