Adoption of payments for ecosystem services: An application of the Hagerstrand model

被引:30
|
作者
van der Horst, Dan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Geog Earth & Environm Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
Innovation-diffusion; Farmer decision making; Neighbourhood networks; Payments for ecosystem services (PES); Agri-environmental schemes (AES); Environmentally sensitive areas (ESA); GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; CONSERVATION; POLICY; SCHEMES; BIODIVERSITY; RESTORATION; GENERATION; BENEFITS; FARMERS; PLACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.12.001
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Many governments are now offering incentive payments to private land owners to adapt their management of the land in such a way as to safeguard or enhance ecosystem service provision. These payments are offered to individual land owners, whose decisions may be influenced by economic rationality, but also other factors. Understanding factors such as social capital and neighbourhood networks is particularly relevant as these can help to create local patterns of high and coordinated uptake. This is important because the delivery of many ecosystem services depends on spatial patterns of interventions at the landscape scale, i.e. at spatial scales of multiple farms. To date little empirical work has been carried out to estimate the extent and relative importance of local land owner networks on entry into ecosystem services payment schemes. This study demonstrates a method to detect possible relationships between farm locations and the time of adoption. Based on Thorsten Hagerstrand's model of innovation diffusion as a spatio-temporal process, a simulation approach is used to detect spatio-temporal clustering in the uptake of a case study ESP scheme, the Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) scheme in Scotland. The analysis reveals clear spatio-temporal uptake patterns at different spatial scales and in different types of rural spaces. It is argued that these findings have relevance for local adaptation of policies, both to liaise more effectively with sections of the farming community, and to achieve better uptake patterns at the landscape scale. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 676
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Payments for ecosystem services in Indonesia
    Suich, Helen
    Lugina, Mega
    Muttaqin, Muhammad Zahrul
    Alviya, Iis
    Sari, Galih Kartika
    ORYX, 2017, 51 (03) : 489 - 497
  • [2] Payments for ecosystem services as an essential approach to improving ecosystem services: A review
    Yan, Haiming
    Yang, Huicai
    Guo, Xiaonan
    Zhao, Shuqin
    Jiang, Qun'ou
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 201
  • [3] Payments for Ecosystem Services—the Case of Forests
    Irina Prokofieva
    Current Forestry Reports, 2016, 2 : 130 - 142
  • [4] The promise and perils of payments for ecosystem services
    Salzman, Jim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 1 (1-2) : 5 - 20
  • [5] A zoological perspective on payments for ecosystem services
    McNeely, Jeffrey A.
    INTEGRATIVE ZOOLOGY, 2007, 2 (02): : 68 - 78
  • [6] Payments and penalties in ecosystem services programs
    Kim, Youngho
    Lichtenberg, Erik
    Newburn, David A.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 126
  • [7] A targeted approach to payments for ecosystem services
    Wang, Pu
    Wolf, Steven A.
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2019, 17
  • [8] Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism
    Kosoy, Nicolas
    Corbera, Esteve
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (06) : 1228 - 1236
  • [9] Payments for Ecosystem Services and Wealth Distribution
    Wang, Pu
    Poe, Gregory L.
    Wolf, Steven A.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 132 : 63 - 68
  • [10] Application of payments for ecosystem services and nexus modeling for agriculture land use management
    Monireh Nobakht
    Banafsheh Zahraie
    Neda Dolatabadi
    Hamidreza Rezazadeh
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2024, 17 (2)