Adoption of payments for ecosystem services: An application of the Hagerstrand model

被引:30
|
作者
van der Horst, Dan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Geog Earth & Environm Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
Innovation-diffusion; Farmer decision making; Neighbourhood networks; Payments for ecosystem services (PES); Agri-environmental schemes (AES); Environmentally sensitive areas (ESA); GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; CONSERVATION; POLICY; SCHEMES; BIODIVERSITY; RESTORATION; GENERATION; BENEFITS; FARMERS; PLACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.12.001
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Many governments are now offering incentive payments to private land owners to adapt their management of the land in such a way as to safeguard or enhance ecosystem service provision. These payments are offered to individual land owners, whose decisions may be influenced by economic rationality, but also other factors. Understanding factors such as social capital and neighbourhood networks is particularly relevant as these can help to create local patterns of high and coordinated uptake. This is important because the delivery of many ecosystem services depends on spatial patterns of interventions at the landscape scale, i.e. at spatial scales of multiple farms. To date little empirical work has been carried out to estimate the extent and relative importance of local land owner networks on entry into ecosystem services payment schemes. This study demonstrates a method to detect possible relationships between farm locations and the time of adoption. Based on Thorsten Hagerstrand's model of innovation diffusion as a spatio-temporal process, a simulation approach is used to detect spatio-temporal clustering in the uptake of a case study ESP scheme, the Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) scheme in Scotland. The analysis reveals clear spatio-temporal uptake patterns at different spatial scales and in different types of rural spaces. It is argued that these findings have relevance for local adaptation of policies, both to liaise more effectively with sections of the farming community, and to achieve better uptake patterns at the landscape scale. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 676
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] INVESTIGATION OF FOREST ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND PAYMENTS FOR ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN TURKISH FORESTRY SECTOR PLANS
    Demirci, Ufuk
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOSYSTEMS AND ECOLOGY SCIENCE-IJEES, 2021, 11 (01): : 73 - 82
  • [32] APPLICATION OF AN ECOSYSTEM MODEL TO AN OFFICE OF HANDICAPPED SERVICES
    SCHUH, JH
    VELTMAN, GC
    JOURNAL OF COLLEGE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT, 1991, 32 (03) : 236 - 240
  • [33] Payments for Ecosystem Services in the Context of Adaptation to Climate Change
    van de Sand, Isabel
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2012, 17 (01):
  • [34] Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services
    Corbera, Esteve
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (06) : 612 - 619
  • [35] Feedback of telecoupling: the case of a payments for ecosystem services program
    Yang, Hongbo
    Lupi, Frank
    Zhang, Jindong
    Chen, Xiaodong
    Liu, Jianguo
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (02):
  • [36] Can payments solve the problem of undersupply of ecosystem services?
    Robert, Nicolas
    Stenger, Anne
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 35 : 83 - 91
  • [37] Feedback effect of crop raiding in payments for ecosystem services
    Chen, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Qi
    Peterson, M. Nils
    Song, Conghe
    AMBIO, 2019, 48 (07) : 732 - 740
  • [38] Local Effects of Payments for Ecosystem Services on Rural Poverty
    Laura Villalobos
    Juan Robalino
    Catalina Sandoval
    Francisco Alpízar
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2023, 84 : 753 - 774
  • [39] Increasing the impact of collective incentives in payments for ecosystem services
    Kaczan, David
    Pfaff, Alexander
    Rodriguez, Luz
    Shapiro-Garza, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 86 : 48 - 67
  • [40] Payments for ecosystem services and the financing of global biodiversity conservation
    Hein, Lars
    Miller, Daniel C.
    de Groot, Rudolf
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (01) : 87 - 93