Predicting Clinically Significant Improvement After Robot-Assisted Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Subacute and Chronic Stroke

被引:10
|
作者
Lee, Jae Joon [1 ]
Shin, Joon-Ho [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Minist Hlth & Welf, Dept Rehabil Med, Natl Rehabil Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Minist Hlth & Welf, Natl Rehabil Ctr, Translat Res Ctr Rehabil Robots, Seoul, South Korea
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷
关键词
robotics; upper extremity; minimal clinically important difference; prognosis; rehabilitation; stroke; ACTIVE FINGER EXTENSION; FUGL-MEYER ASSESSMENT; ARM FUNCTION; MOTOR; RECOVERY; OUTCOMES; THERAPY; RELIABILITY; IMPAIRMENT; MOVEMENTS;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2021.668923
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Prior studies examining predictors of favorable clinical outcomes after upper limb robot-assisted therapy (RT) have many shortcomings. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify meaningful predictors and a prediction model for clinically significant motor improvement in upper limb impairment after RT for each stroke phase. This retrospective, single-center study enrolled patients with stroke who received RT using InMotion2 along with conventional therapy (CT) from January 2015 to September 2019. Demographic characteristics, clinical measures, and robotic kinematic measures were evaluated. The primary outcome measure was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and we classified patients with improvement more than the minimal clinically important difference as responders for each stroke phase. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between potential predictors and RT responders and determine meaningful predictors. Subsequently, meaningful predictors were included in the final prediction model. One hundred forty-four patients were enrolled. The Hand Movement Scale and time since onset were significant predictors of clinically significant improvement in upper limb impairment (P = 0.045 and 0.043, respectively), as represented by the FMA-UE score after RT along with CT, in patients with subacute stroke. These variables were also meaningful predictors with borderline statistical significance in patients with chronic stroke (P = 0.076 and 0.066, respectively). Better hand movement and a shorter time since onset can be used as realistic predictors of clinically significant motor improvement in upper limb impairment after RT with InMotion2 alongside CT in patients with subacute and chronic stroke. This information may help healthcare professionals discern optimal patients for RT and accurately inform patients and caregivers about outcomes of RT.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Effects of prolonged robot-assisted training on upper limb motor recovery in subacute stroke
    Duret, Christophe
    Hutin, Emilie
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2013, 33 (01) : 41 - 48
  • [12] Effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients
    Sale, Patrizio
    Franceschini, Marco
    Mazzoleni, Stefano
    Palma, Enzo
    Agosti, Maurizio
    Posteraro, Federico
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 11
  • [13] Upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation versus physical therapy on subacute stroke patients: A follow-up study
    Franceschini, Marco
    Mazzoleni, Stefano
    Goffredo, Michela
    Pournajaf, Sanaz
    Galafate, Daniele
    Criscuolo, Simone
    Agosti, Maurizio
    Posteraro, Federico
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2020, 24 (01) : 194 - 198
  • [14] Robot-assisted therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation in subacute stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chien, Wai-tong
    Chong, Yuen-yu
    Tse, Man-kei
    Chien, Cheuk-woon
    Cheng, Ho-yu
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2020, 10 (08):
  • [15] Predictors of activities of daily living outcomes after upper limb robot-assisted therapy in subacute stroke patients
    Franceschini, Marco
    Goffredo, Michela
    Pournajaf, Sanaz
    Paravati, Stefano
    Agosti, Maurizio
    De Pisi, Francesco
    Galafate, Daniele
    Posteraro, Federico
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [16] Benefits of Robot-Assisted Upper-Limb Rehabilitation from the Subacute Stage after a Stroke of Varying Severity: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ahn, So Young
    Bok, Soo-Kyung
    Lee, Ji Young
    Ryoo, Hyeon Woo
    Lee, Hoo Young
    Park, Hye Jung
    Oh, Hyun Mi
    Kim, Tae-Woo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (03)
  • [17] Robot-Assisted Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Platform
    Malosio, Matteo
    Pedrocchi, Nicola
    Tosatti, Lorenzo Molinari
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI 2010), 2010, : 115 - 116
  • [18] Towards Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation of Upper Limb Dysfunction
    Voiculescu, Irina
    Cameron, Stephen
    Zabarauskas, Manfred
    Kozlowski, Piotr
    ADVANCES IN ROBOT DESIGN AND INTELLIGENT CONTROL, 2016, 371 : 347 - 355
  • [19] Kinematic Parameters for Tracking Patient Progress during Upper Limb Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation: An Observational Study on Subacute Stroke Subjects
    Goffredo, Michela
    Mazzoleni, Stefano
    Gison, Annalisa
    Infarinato, Francesco
    Pournajaf, Sanaz
    Galafate, Daniele
    Agosti, Maurizio
    Posteraro, Federico
    Franceschini, Marco
    APPLIED BIONICS AND BIOMECHANICS, 2019, 2019
  • [20] Clinical Prediction Rule for Identifying the Stroke Patients who will Obtain Clinically Important Improvement of Upper Limb Motor Function by Robot-Assisted Upper Limb
    Iwamoto, Yuji
    Imura, Takeshi
    Tanaka, Ryo
    Mitsutake, Tsubasa
    Jung, Hungu
    Suzukawa, Takahiro
    Taki, Shingo
    Imada, Naoki
    Inagawa, Tetsuji
    Araki, Hayato
    Araki, Osamu
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2022, 31 (07):