Wild, native bees and managed honey bees benefit from similar agricultural land uses

被引:56
|
作者
Evans, Elaine [1 ]
Smart, Matthew [1 ,2 ]
Cariveau, Dan [1 ]
Spivak, Marla [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Entomol, 1980 Folwell Ave, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] USGS, Northern Prairie Wildlife Res Ctr, 8711 37th St SE, Jamestown, ND USA
关键词
Agriculture; Land use; Apoidea; Wild bee; Native bee; Managed bee; Apis mellifera; Honey bee; FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY; SOUTHERN ALBERTA; LANDSCAPE; ECOLOGY; HYMENOPTERA; GRASSLANDS; DECLINE; BOMBUS; APIDAE; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2018.09.014
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Although both managed and unmanaged bees are important pollinators of crops and wild plants, efforts to address questions about landscapes that best support pollinators often focus on either wild pollinators or honey bees. This study examined if there was concordance between the success of wild bee communities and managed honey bee colonies at sites varying in floral availability and disturbance level in a predominantly agricultural landscape. We also determined which agricultural land uses best supported wild bee communities. The study area in the state of North Dakota in Northern Great Plains in North America is home to understudied native bee communities as well as over 1/4 of U.S. commercial honey bee colonies during the summer months. There is an assumption that honey bees can do well in agricultural areas but that wild bees need natural areas to thrive. We compared wild bee community success with health and survival of managed honey bees (data obtained from a related study) at six apiary locations over three years. We examined wild bee communities and surrounding land uses at 18 locations, three of which were spatially associated with each of six apiary locations. Wild bee abundance and species diversity were positively correlated with honey production, a measure of honey bee success, indicating that locations supporting successful honey bee colonies also supported successful wild bee communities. Grasslands, bee-forage crops, wooded areas, and wetlands were associated with increased abundance, species diversity, or functional diversity of wild bee communities. Crops not providing forage for bees, predominantly soybean, corn, and wheat, were associated with decreased functional diversity, decreased above-ground nesting bees and bees with shorter active season durations, and decreased honey bee survival. Pollinator conservation efforts retaining and enhancing grasslands, wooded areas, wetlands, and crops providing bee forage will likely support the growth, reproduction, and survival of diverse wild bee communities and the success of managed honey bees in areas dominated by intensive agriculture.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 170
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Floral enhancement of turfgrass lawns benefits wild bees and honey bees (Apis mellifera)
    James Wolfin
    Eric Watkins
    Ian Lane
    Zachary M. Portman
    Marla Spivak
    [J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2023, 26 : 361 - 375
  • [42] Floral enhancement of turfgrass lawns benefits wild bees and honey bees (Apis mellifera)
    Wolfin, James
    Watkins, Eric
    Lane, Ian
    Portman, Zachary M.
    Spivak, Marla
    [J]. URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2023, 26 (02) : 361 - 375
  • [43] Competition between honey bees and wild bees and the role of nesting resources in a nature reserve
    Anika Hudewenz
    Alexandra-Maria Klein
    [J]. Journal of Insect Conservation, 2013, 17 : 1275 - 1283
  • [44] Seasonal dynamics of competition between honey bees and wild bees in a protected Mediterranean scrubland
    Ropars, Lise
    Affre, Laurence
    Thebault, Elisa
    Geslin, Benoit
    [J]. OIKOS, 2022, 2022 (04)
  • [45] Competition between honey bees and wild bees and the role of nesting resources in a nature reserve
    Hudewenz, Anika
    Klein, Alexandra-Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION, 2013, 17 (06) : 1275 - 1283
  • [46] GLUCONOBACTERS FROM HONEY BEES
    LAMBERT, B
    KERSTERS, K
    GOSSELE, F
    SWINGS, J
    DELEY, J
    [J]. ANTONIE VAN LEEUWENHOEK JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 1981, 47 (02): : 147 - 157
  • [47] Do competing honey bees matter? Dynamics and abundance of native bees before and after honey bee invasion
    Roubik, DW
    Wolda, H
    [J]. POPULATION ECOLOGY, 2001, 43 (01) : 53 - 62
  • [48] Insecticide Susceptibility in Asian Honey Bees (Apis cerana (Hymenoptera: Apidae)) and Implications for Wild Honey Bees in Asia
    Yasuda, Mika
    Sakamoto, Yoshiko
    Goka, Koichi
    Nagamitsu, Teruyoshi
    Taki, Hisatomo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 2017, 110 (02) : 447 - 452
  • [49] Do managed bees have negative effects on wild bees?: A systematic review of the literature
    Mallinger, Rachel E.
    Gaines-Day, Hannah R.
    Gratton, Claudio
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (12):
  • [50] Negative impacts of dominance on bee communities: Does the influence of invasive honey bees differ from native bees?
    Garibaldi, Lucas A.
    Perez-Mendez, Nestor
    Cordeiro, Guaraci D.
    Hughes, Alice
    Orr, Michael
    Alves-dos-Santos, Isabel
    Freitas, Breno M.
    de Oliveira, Favizia Freitas
    LeBuhn, Gretchen
    Bartomeus, Ignasi
    Aizen, Marcelo A.
    Andrade, Patricia B.
    Blochtein, Betina
    Boscolo, Danilo
    Drumond, Patricia M.
    Gaglianone, Maria Cristina
    Gemmill-Herren, Barbara
    Halinski, Rosana
    Krug, Cristiane
    Maues, Marcia Motta
    Piedade Kiill, Lucia H.
    Pinheiro, Mardiore
    Pires, Carmen S. S.
    Viana, Blandina Felipe
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2021, 102 (12)