Wild, native bees and managed honey bees benefit from similar agricultural land uses

被引:56
|
作者
Evans, Elaine [1 ]
Smart, Matthew [1 ,2 ]
Cariveau, Dan [1 ]
Spivak, Marla [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Entomol, 1980 Folwell Ave, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] USGS, Northern Prairie Wildlife Res Ctr, 8711 37th St SE, Jamestown, ND USA
关键词
Agriculture; Land use; Apoidea; Wild bee; Native bee; Managed bee; Apis mellifera; Honey bee; FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY; SOUTHERN ALBERTA; LANDSCAPE; ECOLOGY; HYMENOPTERA; GRASSLANDS; DECLINE; BOMBUS; APIDAE; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2018.09.014
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Although both managed and unmanaged bees are important pollinators of crops and wild plants, efforts to address questions about landscapes that best support pollinators often focus on either wild pollinators or honey bees. This study examined if there was concordance between the success of wild bee communities and managed honey bee colonies at sites varying in floral availability and disturbance level in a predominantly agricultural landscape. We also determined which agricultural land uses best supported wild bee communities. The study area in the state of North Dakota in Northern Great Plains in North America is home to understudied native bee communities as well as over 1/4 of U.S. commercial honey bee colonies during the summer months. There is an assumption that honey bees can do well in agricultural areas but that wild bees need natural areas to thrive. We compared wild bee community success with health and survival of managed honey bees (data obtained from a related study) at six apiary locations over three years. We examined wild bee communities and surrounding land uses at 18 locations, three of which were spatially associated with each of six apiary locations. Wild bee abundance and species diversity were positively correlated with honey production, a measure of honey bee success, indicating that locations supporting successful honey bee colonies also supported successful wild bee communities. Grasslands, bee-forage crops, wooded areas, and wetlands were associated with increased abundance, species diversity, or functional diversity of wild bee communities. Crops not providing forage for bees, predominantly soybean, corn, and wheat, were associated with decreased functional diversity, decreased above-ground nesting bees and bees with shorter active season durations, and decreased honey bee survival. Pollinator conservation efforts retaining and enhancing grasslands, wooded areas, wetlands, and crops providing bee forage will likely support the growth, reproduction, and survival of diverse wild bee communities and the success of managed honey bees in areas dominated by intensive agriculture.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 170
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparing the pollination services of honey bees and wild bees in a watermelon field
    Garantonakis, Nikos
    Varikou, Kyriaki
    Birouraki, Athanasia
    Edwards, Mike
    Kalliakaki, Voula
    Andrinopoulos, Fotis
    [J]. SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2016, 204 : 138 - 144
  • [22] Do managed bees drive parasite spread and emergence in wild bees?
    Graystock, Peter
    Blane, Edward J.
    McFrederick, Quinn S.
    Goulson, Dave
    Hughes, William O. H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY-PARASITES AND WILDLIFE, 2016, 5 (01): : 64 - 75
  • [23] Declines of managed honey bees and beekeepers in Europe
    Potts, Simon G.
    Roberts, Stuart P. M.
    Dean, Robin
    Marris, Gay
    Brown, Mike A.
    Jones, Richard
    Neumann, Peter
    Settele, Josef
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2010, 49 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [24] Getting it right for native wild bees
    Sheppard, D
    [J]. BEE WORLD, 1998, 79 (01) : 3 - 4
  • [25] Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees
    Woodcock, B. A.
    Bullock, J. M.
    Shore, R. F.
    Heard, M. S.
    Pereira, M. G.
    Redhead, J.
    Ridding, L.
    Dean, H.
    Sleep, D.
    Henrys, P.
    Peyton, J.
    Hulmes, S.
    Hulmes, L.
    Sarospataki, M.
    Saure, C.
    Edwards, M.
    Genersch, E.
    Knaebe, S.
    Pywell, R. F.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2017, 356 (6345) : 1393 - +
  • [26] Pollination by wild bees yields larger strawberries than pollination by honey bees
    MacInnis, Gail
    Forrest, Jessica R. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2019, 56 (04) : 824 - 832
  • [27] Pollen diets and niche overlap of honey bees and native bees in protected areas
    Elliott, Brittany
    Wilson, Rachele
    Shapcott, Alison
    Keller, Alexander
    Newis, Ryan
    Cannizzaro, Chris
    Burwell, Chris
    Smith, Tobias
    Leonhardt, Sara D.
    Kaemper, Wiebke
    Wallace, Helen M.
    [J]. BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2021, 50 : 169 - 180
  • [28] Evaluating competition for forage plants between honey bees and wild bees in Denmark
    Rasmussen, Claus
    Dupont, Yoko L.
    Madsen, Henning Bang
    Bogusch, Petr
    Goulson, Dave
    Herbertsson, Lina
    Maia, Kate Pereira
    Nielsen, Anders
    Olesen, Jens M.
    Potts, Simon G.
    Roberts, Stuart P. M.
    Sydenham, Markus Arne Kjaer
    Kryger, Per
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (04):
  • [29] WILD HONEY BEES: AN INTIMATE PORTRAIT.
    Seeley, Thomas D.
    [J]. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 2022, 97 (02): : 150 - 150
  • [30] No honey bees native to America and Australia? Why?
    Dutton, IC
    [J]. AMERICAN BEE JOURNAL, 1996, 136 (12): : 828 - 829