Edge-Of-Field Evaluation of the Ohio Phosphorus Risk Index

被引:20
|
作者
Williams, Mark R. [1 ]
King, Kevin W. [2 ]
LaBarge, Gregory A. [3 ]
Confesor, Remegio B., Jr. [4 ]
Fausey, Norman R. [2 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Natl Soil Eros Res Lab, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Soil Drainage Res Unit, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Marion, OH USA
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Natl Ctr Water Qual Res, Tiffin, OH USA
关键词
TILE-DRAINED LANDSCAPES; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; SITE VULNERABILITY; ASSESSMENT-TOOL; WATER-QUALITY; RUNOFF; MANAGEMENT; LOSSES; SCALE; LOADS;
D O I
10.2134/jeq2016.05.0198
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Phosphorus Index (PI) has been the cornerstone for phosphorus (P)-based management and planning over the past twenty years, yet field-scale evaluation of many state PIs has been limited. In this study, P loads measured in surface runoff and tile discharge from 40 agricultural fields in Ohio with prevailing management practices were used to evaluate the Ohio PI. Annual P loads were highly variable among fields (dissolved reactive P: 0.03-4.51 kg ha(-1), total P: 0.03-6.88 kg ha(-1)). Both measured annual dissolved reactive P (R-2 = 0.36, p < 0.001) and total P (R-2 = 0.25, p < 0.001) loads were significantly related to Ohio PI score. The relationship between measured load and PI score substantially improved when averaged annual field values were used (dissolved reactive P: R-2 = 0.71, total P: R-2 = 0.73), indicating that the Ohio PI should be utilized to evaluate average annual risk of P loss, rather than as an annual risk tool. Comparison between the Ohio PI and other established local and national metrics resulted in large differences in potential P management recommendations for the monitored fields. In the near term, revision of Ohio PI risk categories and management recommendations using local P loading thresholds is needed. To meet the minimum criteria for state PI tools, future research efforts should focus on using measured field data (i) to incorporate new input factors (i.e., P application timing and leaching potential) into the Ohio PI, and (ii) to calibrate and validate the Ohio PI to provide better P risk assessments and management recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:1306 / 1313
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Scientific Opinion on the effect assessment for pesticides on sediment organisms in edge-of-field surface water
    Aagaard, Alf
    Brock, Theo
    Capri, Ettore
    Duquesne, Sabine
    Filipic, Metka
    Hernandez-Jerez, Antonio F.
    Hirsch-Ernst, Karen I.
    Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
    Klein, Michael
    Kuhl, Thomas
    Laskowski, Ryszard
    Liess, Matthias
    Mantovani, Alberto
    Ockleford, Colin
    Ossendorp, Bernadette
    Smith, Robert
    Sousa, Paulo
    Sundh, Ingvar
    Tiktak, Aaldrik
    Van Der Linden, Ton
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2015, 13 (07)
  • [32] A comparison analysis of edge-of-field run-off from two sugarcane fields
    Yu, Kewei
    DeLaune, Ronald D.
    ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2012, 58 (01) : 51 - 59
  • [33] Surface runoff and subsurface tile drain losses of neonicotinoids and companion herbicides at edge-of-field
    Chretien, Francois
    Giroux, Isabelle
    Theriault, Georges
    Gagnon, Patrick
    Corriveau, Julie
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2017, 224 : 255 - 264
  • [34] Thinking beyond the Bioreactor Box: Incorporating Stream Ecology into Edge-of-Field Nitrate Management
    Goeller, Brandon C.
    Febria, Catherine M.
    Harding, Jon S.
    McIntosh, Angus R.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2016, 45 (03) : 866 - 872
  • [35] Edge-of-Field Runoff Analysis following Grazing and Silvicultural Best Management Practices in Northeast Texas
    Wagner, Kevin L.
    Gregory, Lucas
    Gerlich, Jason A.
    Rhodes, Edward C.
    deVilleneuve, Stephanie
    WATER, 2023, 15 (20)
  • [36] Measuring edge-of-field water quality: Where we have been and the path forward
    Harmel, R. D.
    King, K.
    Busch, D.
    Smith, D.
    Birgand, F.
    Haggard, B.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2018, 73 (01) : 86 - 96
  • [37] Challenges in linking soil health to edge-of-field water quality across the Great Lakes basin
    Fermanich, Kevin
    Meyers, Molly
    Loken, Luke C.
    Bischoff-Gray, Marianne
    Turco, Ron
    Stahlheber, Karen
    Duriancik, Lisa
    Dornbush, Mathew
    Komiskey, Matt
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2023, 52 (03) : 508 - 522
  • [38] Ecotoxicological tools for the tropics: Sublethal assays with fish to evaluate edge-of-field pesticide runoff toxicity
    Moreira, S. M.
    Moreira-Santos, M.
    Rendon-von Osten, J.
    da Silva, E. M.
    Ribeiro, R.
    Guilhermino, L.
    Soares, A. M. V. M.
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2010, 73 (05) : 893 - 899
  • [39] Assessing the Impact of Site-Specific BMPs Using a Spatially Explicit, Field-Scale SWAT Model with Edge-of-Field and Tile Hydrology and Water-Quality Data in the Eagle Creek Watershed, Ohio
    Merriman, Katherine R.
    Daggupati, Prasad
    Srinivasan, Raghavan
    Toussant, Chad
    Russell, Amy M.
    Hayhurst, Brett
    WATER, 2018, 10 (10)
  • [40] Using edge-of-field monitoring to characterize water quality: A farmer cooperative case study in northern Missouri
    Udawatta, Ranjith P.
    Jose, Shibu
    Hefner, Steven
    Brinkman, Karen
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 4 (03)