Edge-Of-Field Evaluation of the Ohio Phosphorus Risk Index

被引:20
|
作者
Williams, Mark R. [1 ]
King, Kevin W. [2 ]
LaBarge, Gregory A. [3 ]
Confesor, Remegio B., Jr. [4 ]
Fausey, Norman R. [2 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Natl Soil Eros Res Lab, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Soil Drainage Res Unit, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Marion, OH USA
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Natl Ctr Water Qual Res, Tiffin, OH USA
关键词
TILE-DRAINED LANDSCAPES; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; SITE VULNERABILITY; ASSESSMENT-TOOL; WATER-QUALITY; RUNOFF; MANAGEMENT; LOSSES; SCALE; LOADS;
D O I
10.2134/jeq2016.05.0198
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Phosphorus Index (PI) has been the cornerstone for phosphorus (P)-based management and planning over the past twenty years, yet field-scale evaluation of many state PIs has been limited. In this study, P loads measured in surface runoff and tile discharge from 40 agricultural fields in Ohio with prevailing management practices were used to evaluate the Ohio PI. Annual P loads were highly variable among fields (dissolved reactive P: 0.03-4.51 kg ha(-1), total P: 0.03-6.88 kg ha(-1)). Both measured annual dissolved reactive P (R-2 = 0.36, p < 0.001) and total P (R-2 = 0.25, p < 0.001) loads were significantly related to Ohio PI score. The relationship between measured load and PI score substantially improved when averaged annual field values were used (dissolved reactive P: R-2 = 0.71, total P: R-2 = 0.73), indicating that the Ohio PI should be utilized to evaluate average annual risk of P loss, rather than as an annual risk tool. Comparison between the Ohio PI and other established local and national metrics resulted in large differences in potential P management recommendations for the monitored fields. In the near term, revision of Ohio PI risk categories and management recommendations using local P loading thresholds is needed. To meet the minimum criteria for state PI tools, future research efforts should focus on using measured field data (i) to incorporate new input factors (i.e., P application timing and leaching potential) into the Ohio PI, and (ii) to calibrate and validate the Ohio PI to provide better P risk assessments and management recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:1306 / 1313
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AGRO 208-Application of REMM to design edge-of-field buffers
    Lowrance, Richard
    Williams, Randall G.
    Wauchope, R. Don
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 233 : 304 - 304
  • [22] Impact of surface roughness and crusting on particle size distribution of edge-of-field sediments
    Panuska, John C.
    Karthikeyan, K. G.
    Miller, P. S.
    GEODERMA, 2008, 145 (3-4) : 315 - 324
  • [23] Edge-of-field management to mitigate potential off-site pesticide movement
    Locke, Martin
    Moore, Matthew
    Yasarer, Lindsey
    Bingner, Ron
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 258
  • [24] Subsurface nutrient export from a cropped field to an agricultural stream: Implications for targeting edge-of-field practices
    Schilling, Keith E.
    Streeter, Matthew T.
    Vogelgesang, Jason
    Jones, Christopher S.
    Seeman, Anthony
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2020, 241 (241)
  • [25] Phosphorus risk assessment index evaluation using runoff measurements
    Eghball, B
    Gilley, JE
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2001, 56 (03) : 202 - 206
  • [26] Quantifying Annual Nitrogen Loss to Groundwater Via Edge-of-Field Monitoring: Method and Application
    Cardiff, Michael
    Schachter, Laura
    Krause, Jake
    Gotkowitz, Madeline
    Austin, Brian
    GROUNDWATER, 2023, 61 (01) : 21 - 34
  • [27] Edge-of-field runoff prediction by a hybrid modeling approach using causal inference
    Hu, Yao
    Fitzpatrick, Lindsay
    Fry, Lauren M.
    Mason, Lacey
    Read, Laura K.
    Goering, Dustin C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 3 (07):
  • [28] Indirect effects of herbicides on biota in terrestrial edge-of-field habitats: A critical review of the literature
    Prosser, Ryan S.
    Anderson, Julie C.
    Hanson, Mark L.
    Solomon, Keith R.
    Sibley, Paul K.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 232 : 59 - 72
  • [29] In Situ and Laboratory Microalgal Assays in the Tropics: A Microcosm Simulation of Edge-of-Field Pesticide Runoff
    M. Moreira-Santos
    E. M. da Silva
    A. M. V. M. Soares
    R. Ribeiro
    Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2005, 74 : 48 - 55
  • [30] In situ and laboratory microalgal assays in the tropics: A microcosm simulation of edge-of-field pesticide runoff
    Moreira-Santos, M
    da Silva, EM
    Soares, AMVM
    Ribeiro, R
    BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2005, 74 (01) : 48 - 55