Evaluating the performance of PI-RADS v2 in the non-academic setting

被引:21
|
作者
Jordan, Eric J. [1 ]
Fiske, Charles [2 ]
Zagoria, Ronald J. [1 ]
Westphalen, Antonio C. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, 505 Parnasssus Ave,M-391, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] RadNet Med Imaging, Walnut Creek, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging & Urol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
Computed tomography; Angiography; Aortic aneurysm; EVAR; Imaging; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; CANCER; BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS; FUSION; SYSTEM; SCORE;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-017-1169-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the utility of PI-RADS v2 to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer (CS-PCa) with magnetic resonance ultrasound (MR/US) fusion-guided prostate biopsies in the non-academic setting. Materials/methods: Retrospective analysis of men whom underwent prostate multiparametric MRI and subsequent MR/US fusion biopsies at a single non-academic center from 11/2014 to 3/2016. Prostate MRIs were performed on a 3-Tesla scanner with a surface body coil. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2 scoring algorithm was utilized and MR/US fusion biopsies were performed in selected cases. Mixed effect logistic regression analyses and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed on PI-RADS v2 alone and combined with PSA density (PSAD) to predict CS-PCa. Results: 170 patients underwent prostate MRI with 282 PI-RADS lesions. MR/US fusion diagnosed 71 CS-PCa, 33 Gleason score 3+3, and 168 negative. PI-RADS v2 score is a statistically significant predictor of CS-PCa (P < 0.001). For each one-point increase in the overall PI-RADS v2 score, the odds of having CS-PCa increases by 4.2 (95% CI 2.2-8.3). The area under the ROC curve for PI-RADS v2 is 0.69 (95% CI 0.63-0.76) and for PI-RADS v2 + PSAD is 0.76 (95% CI 0.69-0.82), statistically higher than PI-RADS v2 alone (P < 0.001). The rate of CS-PCa was about twice higher in men with high PSAD (>= 0.15) compared to men with low PSAD (< 0.15) when a PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesion was detected (P = 0.005). Conclusion: PI-RADS v2 is a strong predictor of CS-PCa in the non-academic setting and can be further strengthened when utilized with PSA density.
引用
收藏
页码:2725 / 2731
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Concordance analysis between Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS v2) and prostatectomy histologic findings
    Han, Bing
    Kanotra, Jhanvi
    Sura, Gloria
    Danrad, Raman
    Dewenter, Tracy
    Bhalla, Ritu
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2019, 99
  • [42] Concordance analysis between Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS v2) and prostatectomy histologic findings
    Han, Bing
    Kanotra, Jhanvi
    Sura, Gloria
    Danrad, Raman
    Dewenter, Tracy
    Bhalla, Ritu
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 32
  • [43] The diagnostic value of PI-RADS V1 and V2 using multiparametric MRI in transition zone prostate clinical cancer
    Wang, Ximing
    Bao, Jie
    Ping, Xiaoxia
    Hu, Chunhong
    Hou, Jianquan
    Dong, Fenglin
    Guo, Lingchuan
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 16 (03) : 3201 - 3206
  • [44] Factors Impacting Performance and Reproducibility of PI-RADS
    Turkbey, Baris
    Oto, Aytekin
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2021, 72 (03): : 337 - 338
  • [45] The Role of Radiomics in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the PI-RADS v2 and v2.1 Era: A Systematic Review
    Antolin, Andreu
    Roson, Nuria
    Mast, Richard
    Arce, Javier
    Almodovar, Ramon
    Cortada, Roger
    Maceda, Almudena
    Escobar, Manuel
    Trilla, Enrique
    Morote, Juan
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (17)
  • [46] A calculator based on prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS V2) is a promising prostate cancer predictor
    Wang, Hui
    Tai, Sheng
    Zhang, Li
    Zhou, Jun
    Liang, Chaozhao
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [47] 结合PI-RADS v2建立预测前列腺穿刺结果的评分系统
    杨大山
    彭佩丹
    庞诗语
    龙其成
    詹雅萍
    谭万龙
    临床荟萃, 2017, 32 (10) : 885 - 890
  • [48] Optimizing prostate cancer accumulating model: combined PI-RADS v2 with prostate specific antigen and its derivative data
    Yuan-Fei Lu
    Qian Zhang
    Wei-Gen Yao
    Hai-Yan Chen
    Jie-Yu Chen
    Cong-Cong Xu
    Ri-Sheng Yu
    Cancer Imaging, 19
  • [49] Predictive model containing PI-RADS v2 score for postoperative seminal vesicle invasion among prostate cancer patients
    Wang, Hao
    Ruan, Mingjian
    Wang, He
    Li, Xueying
    Hu, Xuege
    Liu, Hua
    Zhou, Binyi
    Song, Gang
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (02) : 584 - 593
  • [50] Likert vs PI-RADS v2: a comparison of two radiological scoring systems for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Khoo, Christopher C.
    Eldred-Evans, David
    Peters, Max
    Tanaka, Mariana Bertoncelli
    Noureldin, Mohamed
    Miah, Saiful
    Shah, Taimur
    Connor, Martin J.
    Reddy, Deepika
    Clark, Martin
    Lakhani, Amish
    Rockall, Andrea
    Hosking-Jervis, Feargus
    Cullen, Emma
    Arya, Manit
    Hrouda, David
    Qazi, Hasan
    Winkler, Mathias
    Tam, Henry
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 125 (01) : 49 - 55